Bama only beat 2 ranked teams? Fact check time:
Bama's schedule
OSU's schedule
If memory serves me, that BSC championship game was between #1 and #2 - just like the rules say it will be. The big 10 didn't even play a conference championship game that year, so what the heck are we talking about here?
I can see the Auburn spelling coming out here. That checks.
Wow - a 30 yard lucky pass into coverage was your favorite play? Time to watch more SEC football. Did you see any of Trent's "Heisman runs," or the Honeybadger at work, or anything like that?
So your opinion says that two different teams should play versus what the BSC rules say? Makes perfect sense.
I would agree with you if you said something like "perhaps there should be a rule that states you must be your conference champion to play in the big game." The current rules don't require you to be a conference champion to play in the BCS title game, hence the reason why #1 is playing #2, again, just like they have since the inception of the BCS (see above).
So what happens if a team wins the BCS Championship game????? I will have to check the rule book on that (after I recheck the conference champion requirement rule that doesn't exist), but I will bet a weeks salary that the winner of the BCS Championship game will be the BCS champion. I could be wrong, though. Fair or not.
In all seriousness, though, I hear that if Bama does win, there might be cries for another "split championship" with the AP title going to LSU. That's possible, but the BCS was supposed to have eliminated that confusion and controversy. I think if Bama wins, controversy will reign because each team will have only 1-loss to each other, but the BCS national champion will obviously not be in dispute - the winner will raise the crystal football.