Had our Flight Safety NCO win an annual award (FSNCO of the year for the MAJCOM)...participated in numerous community events (tornado rescue/clean up, etc). He's done a TON of stuff in the office to improve the program. He's made a lot of progress on his CCAF degree. Went from a high 70s to high 90s on his PFT in the past 6 months. Started teaching tobacco cessation classes...I could go on. Anyway, my boss and I recommended him for a STEP promotion. The wing command chief shot it down, saying he doesn't have CCAF complete...and we're trying to promote him to Tech.
My question to my boss...why the hell is the chief making the call? Why can't the wing commander make that call?
Next example...here in the AOR, we submitted someone for a medal. The chief out here shot it down and said he won't approve it because a couple years ago this individual failed the PFT. Despite the fact the past year or two this individual has consistently scored in the 80s and 90s (last test was mid-90s)...and the rest of their record is exemplary. But because they screwed up 2-3 years ago and failed, they can't get a medal.
You know what I think that says to our airmen? it. Don't try anymore. No reason to improve or get better because if you failed once, you're ed and you'll never get another pat on the back. Doesn't matter that this medal would have acknowledged your stellar performance over the past half a year...you screwed up many moons ago so it's all for nil. Not to mention...why can't the officers in our leadership chain say "sorry chief, but I'm giving this person a medal...it's deserved".
I wish I could raise more of an issue about this, but it seems everyone else (O-5s, O-6s and O-7s) seem to just roll over and say "well the CMSgt said no". So I realize a junior FGO like me is standing at the base of a cliff with no rope...so vent and bitch on baseops.net it is!