Leaderboard

Gee, only 66 complaints? On second thought, she should've dreamt up three more to make it an even 69 items.

You've got to believe this was a well thought out plan by a bunch of dudes to meet the Miami Dolphins cheerleaders when they return home. Parody their video, thank them for inspiring them, show how crappy Afghanistan is, come home and win... At least one of them will get lucky when they have the mixer.

Don't worry, the moderators on here will move this if we feel necessary. Since it isn't specifically tied to the election, I don't see what it can't have its own thread...

The idea of a military dominated by warrior monks with absolute sexual self-restraint and a central preoccupation with the social and cultural idiosyncrasies of the female gender is a fuckin' pipedream . That concise enough for you, SARC lady? And that's talking about the ones who claim innocence as female members of the military. Let's not even get to the other politically incorrect assertion that the desert queens and squadron bicycles that are the preponderance of military females in deployable positions,do hold responsibility for the outcomes and risks of their sexual machinations when surrounded by a preponderance of sex starved and stressed males. You'll never hear that admission from the SARC lady either. After all we're all rapists and brutes with no conscience. Females are endemically sexually innocent....Fuck that post-feminist view of gender roles. The game is chess it ain't checkers.Caveat emptor.

The best conversation in human history....(NSFW?) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVBYwntkiFA

American laws for fucking stupid. Break in to a house and steal a bunch of shit? Win! Break in to a house and get bitten by a dog? Win! Laws like this were created without thinking of unintended consequences. Hopefully, the judge will see the rediculousness of this case and throw out the parts that don't make sense. Like the homeowner's right to protect their property. Even if that means with a dog.

WWII. Probably Vietnam. Ask Huggy.

Was there ever a time when CC calls were valuable?

See, this is where we differ. You only blame one side for the collapse, whereas I blame all that were involved. Capitalism isn't looting the payroll to give the CEO a 240% raise while in Chapter 11. The laborers weren't responsible for flagging sales and outdated products. The laborers didn't mismanage the company. Yet they are to shoulder ALL the blame for the demise of Hostess? They were the straw that broke the camel's back, but there were other strains prior to that straw.

Little Debbie is better anyway!

Who is John Galt?

No CAPES were harmed in the making of this post. And I did not list anything that was in the Beale/9 RW Critical Information List.

I think this or something similar may have been posted already, but due to my dislike for "journalists," it deserves to be seen again: