Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/10/2014 in all areas

  1. We're arguing about the wrong things, guys. The 2015 HASC-approved military budget will be about $600B in 2015. To show how insanely huge that is, the total yearly operating costs for the A-10, B-1, U-2, and KC-10 put together come to less than $6B. That's less than 1% of the pot for some pretty damn effective platforms. Meanwhile, military retirement costs us $52B per year. That's more than the entire KC-46 acquisition, repeating every year. Canceling legacy platforms save us pennies in comparison, but it's the only thing that seems to generate attention and debate. https://timemilitary.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/afcap-data-for-2008-2012.xlsx
    2 points
  2. Why don't we keep both and close the bases without runways? Just my $.02.
    2 points
  3. In my experience, about 3 days after the 7th time you've called to complain.
    2 points
  4. I think they didn't like being forced to debrief the incident.
    2 points
  5. And I suppose you have some sort of "final solution" to this problem?
    1 point
  6. Your CSAR argument is kinda moot though. CSAR is far more limited by he fact you are still using old worn out G model Hawks than what's running the RESCOURT package. The problem is the Air Force is trying to divest a heavily guard integrated Airplane. Same problem is happening in the Army with Apache. Nobody cares we are retiring the Kiowa what matters is we are taking away guard jobs moving Apache and there for voters are mad. I think that's why you didn't see anywhere near the screaming on the hill when the Navy retired Intruder or Tomcat or the AF retired the F-111. There wasn't a large angry population of Guard guys and all the other jobs attached that vote for their respective districts.
    1 point
  7. Were the chicks that turned him in more offended by the cat brains, or by the pt shorts?
    1 point
  8. The interwebs stalking is strong with this one
    1 point
  9. Because the B-1 isn't single-role the way you describe it. The ability to perform stand-off weapons, conventional munitions, dynamic targeting, naval mining, low altitude strikes, and yes, CAS, outweigh what the A-10 will be able to do on days 1-10 of a war with a near-peer
    1 point
  10. Just Just a reminder.... bitchez..
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...