Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/31/2018 in all areas

  1. I wouldn't take anything posted on Military.com as official, even if quoting "Enlisted Jesus"... The USAF is already producing enlisted RPA drivers, which will be the extent of it. If anything, expect that pipeline will expand. Nothing else.
    1 point
  2. Plenty of enlisted members fly for the airlines. Let's pay for their training and give them wings so they can get their faster! Win for them.
    1 point
  3. Unsure, but the info above may be dated... The retirement "points value" for a retired O-5 has already gone up .03 cents per point since FY16 (worth an extra $150/mo for someone with 5000 ARC retirement points). I'd hate to see someone lose out on this by not staying in the IRR until 60 - assuming they have 20+ good years. Sorry for the de-rail..
    1 point
  4. As always, it depends. But in trying to get movement/resolution on your particular issue, sometimes it is easier for the powers that be to simply correct their mistake than it is to explain to the Congressional enquiry as to why they screwed the pooch. The military chain of command's goal will be to "make the bad man (Congress) go away." If it's easier to simply sign the forms that let you get on your way and not have to explain the f' up, you might have some success. Or, the military can explain why they screwed the pooch. Either way, you will make leadership devote time/attention to your issue. How they respond to it is a crapshoot, but they will have to respond to it. Make sure you speak to the military staffer if you contact your representatives. Have your info at hand and make it easy for the staff to ask the pointed questions that will make the military squirm.
    1 point
  5. You have a pretty good case for the IG due to the stonewalling of not getting a signature on 1 and 2 QTR FY 18. Unless the non-signature is for cause (pending FEB, MEB, admin UCMJ action), they're gonna have to honor your November date, which would fall well before the 4 April date they have given as the deadline for honoring requests. But we simply don't know the circumstances behind your loss of qualification. That may be the sticking point and you may not want to expand about it on here, which is certainly your prerogative. As to the practical implications of this scenario? Just like @SocialD described, it's basically high time to idle-boards participation. UTAs are the only required periods needed to gain a good Reserve year, and AT are the only days your SQ/CC can legally compel you to the squadron and away from your civilian responsibilities (plus the MUTA(s)). If you've already burn those, they can't do fog all. For someone who is already dead to the unit due to the loss of qualification, this is only being done to pad the numbers. What is most likely to happen is you'll submit your IG, everybody will get umbraged, you'll get your signature effective 1 Oct 18. Then, just like two years ago, loss management will get lifted on 1 Oct 18 and you'll be on your way out. I don't have any reason to believe based on earlier loss management that they will concurrently implement loss management on 1 Oct 18 to keep folks for the entire FY 19. Usually these implementations have happened mid-FY, just like this one. Personally I think it's a complete loss on everybody's part that people end their service tenure on such jaded and toxic terms. It truly is a loss for everybody involved. Then again I've also encountered the opposite, people whose attitude is so price-elastic that the second they make a nickel an hour more per duty period at the airline than at the unit, having two jobs is all of a sudden the biggest affront to their livelihoods and the welfare of their children you could ever impose on them. It's a bit much sometimes. That said, the invol IA BS is what's killing manning these days, I'd say even above and beyond TSPs and/or unit-wide mobs.
    1 point
  6. From what I understand, congressional inquiries (like the IG) are pretty worthless.
    1 point
  7. 1. Dear Congressman... 2. Dear Senator 1... 3. Dear Senator 2... As a start.
    1 point
  8. Strictly my opinion, but if you FAIP with the intention of being marketable to airline...fvck you. I know we are trying to generate pilots, but we’re not trying to make airline pilots. I’m with the other AFSOC brains here...go out and cut your teeth while the war is still hot. After you’ve seen you fair share of shit and combat has lost luster, take your white jet tour. As an aside, I have to seriously question the word of a guy who says that his FAIP tour developed a greater sense of airmanship than a combat deployment to Afghanistan in a barrel-roll capable King Air.
    1 point
  9. This guy perished by saving others and this fucking moron makes a political comment? UFB! I hope he gets dragged under By a rip tide and gets raped by coral repeatedly until he kills himself.
    1 point
  10. Seriously. Are we really talking about who’s leave reg and leave web knowledge penis is larger? Who cares. Hit approve and if it doesn’t let you go under verbal and make mpf fix it.
    1 point
  11. I am truthfully scared to death on the direction this train is headed, while the AF shovels more coal into the fire. I think when the time comes I’m bailing completely, I don’t think ANG/Reserves is worth it anymore. Which sucks because I actually still love military flying.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...