Performance ranking reduces meritocracy...
"Many of us have given in to “adopt and adapt” at some point in our careers, and not always comfortably.
You’re sitting in front of a manager for an annual review, thinking: well, how’s this going to work? The manager in question is universally regarded as average, but he’s the one that gets to rate you, and the shortest path to a better ranking is probably to follow his advice."
Link: https://cosmosmagazine.com/mathematics/maybe-you-shouldn-t-follow-the-leader
Study: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.191255
Common gripe in the OPR / EPR threads is the strat methodology and favor given to the junior O's who conform earlier to the game. I'm not sure the authors fix, serendipity (fancy word for luck), is any better due its unpredictable nature...but it's refreshing to see a study confirming my preconceived notions.
Post could have gone in the Promotion thread just as easily