Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/07/2020 in all areas

  1. Why are you just asking fighter/attack folks?
    11 points
  2. ...can't imagine the runway which the 4 Horsemen could've form-landed ...near Edward's maybe? Oh yeah, ...A long time ago in an Air Force far, far away...dinosaur Herk pilots ruled the sky in 4 ship fingertip form
    4 points
  3. FedEx hiring info: The last two classes (8 pilots in March, 10 in April) were all hired into our Hong Kong 767 domicile and will be arriving in HK in mid to late summer. Quick update we received today on future hiring via internal comm: "Due to the increase in extra sections and charters, we were unable to post a realignment bid this spring as originally planned. However, we will begin hiring 757 First Officers right away to shore up staffing needs on the fleet. In addition, we will hire 767 First Officers to staff FY21 aircraft deliveries. The 767 fleet currently stands at 85 with 18 coming into the fleet in FY21 (June 2020-June 2021). In addition, some of the schedule opportunities for the 767 are in crew-intensive international long-haul, which is also driving this hiring need." My takeaway from this is a steady hiring cycle continuing through this year and into next year with probably a minimum of 400 pilots simply for attrition. Many of the companies that made a practice of moving their products as belly freight on passenger aircraft have obviously had to change their mode of transit. FedEx has taken the opportunity to negotiate long term contracts (7 years in some cases) with them and locked in a significant increase in future expected business. So, all things continue to indicate growth and hiring. One other thing I forgot - We had a pool of about 200 that were interviewed late summer into the fall of 2019. My guess is those poolies will take us into late 2020 before more "off the street" pilots are being put into classes. But, I think late summer to fall interviews this year with start dates in 2021 are a realistic expectation for anyone not interviewed yet. Caveat all of the above with an end to Covid BS by this fall if not sooner. We won't dodge that bullet forever if this keeps up.
    3 points
  4. No hate, looking sharp! Here’s one of the same jet from a slightly different angle 🇺🇸
    2 points
  5. Exactly. Sure would be embarrassing if this video were shown to the group leading armed Overwatch requirements for SOCOM, especially if they were led by SLAYER 01....
    2 points
  6. Since the topic of "formation approaches and wing landings" has come up elsewhere, I want to ask the fighter/attack folks about fingertip: is it still relevant to what you do? Or if IMC, do you depart/arrive via some sort of radar trail? What about the A-10's? Do they use fingertip more? Or do they split up to singletons? Do A-10's do wing takeoffs if there is a 600' ceiling on departure? I realize fighters can come up initial in fingertip... but is flying initial in tactical better/preferred/more common, as compared to fingertip? Bottom line: is fingertip still relevant to what you do as a fighter/attack pilot? Is the answer different if we are talking about the F-22/F-35 instead of the F-16/F-16? My personal opinions don't matter any more. Just looking to see if technology has moved us further away from fingertip. According to what I've read, formation landings aren't operationally necessary for y'all.
    1 point
  7. Especially since they predict over 2/3 of the US population will contract the virus before this is over. Wtf do they think they are going to find recruits?
    1 point
  8. Not just ground forces. Primary desire for the HAF going in with that GF aboard is that asset is both live and able to do it line of sight to all the players in the stack. SATCOM is a secondary. Ideal desire is that not only can that asset be manned, but be low enough in the stack and with a fires capability to do something about it. Hence why the Gunship is so tasked with that role. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    1 point
  9. IZ thanks you for your service.
    1 point
  10. Last Caliphate check shows that a “Retrofitted commercial aircraft” did pretty okay.
    1 point
  11. https://warontherocks.com/2018/04/trust-troops-and-reapers-getting-drone-research-right/
    1 point
  12. Valid. Hope no one steeped in a certain AFSOC program is ever in an acquisitions role for something the Bronco would want to compete for oh wait a second... ::Shot of a PC-12 taxing:: Narrator: "These aircraft fail to perform in these new and unintended roles." GFY Leidos et al. And I'm not an experimental aircraft nerd like some of y'all are or anything but this just looks like a freaking kit plane, am I crazy? And not in a good way. Like it's 1 step up from a gyrocopter or something...
    1 point
  13. The bronco 2 video lost me within the first minute. Their characterization of other assets is misinformed, and not credible.
    1 point
  14. Can we quote you in 30 years? "Man," said the F-69 pilot, "those Viper dinosaurs get on my nerves..."
    1 point
  15. AirGuardian, as others have posted, thanks for your candid and balanced posts on Atlas. Good info! I've got a phone interview with them tomorrow; while the 17 days (really it's 19 right?) on the road might be a tough pill to swallow, I think it'd be a blast to fly a 747 for a bit. I am Palace Chase-ing and will owe some time as a Traditional Reservist.. how has that traditionally worked out with an Atlas schedule? Since it's one big block of time, I assume dropping MilLeave for a few days knocks out the entire trip, meaning my only real option is to do my mil job during the 13/14 days at home?
    1 point
  16. @HuggyU2 what was it like learning to fly in the T-6 Texan 1?
    1 point
  17. Lame stream fake media will not talk about it - given that they were part of the setup. But this man will go over entire thing.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...