Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/01/2023 in all areas
-
A whole lot of silence from some BO members who were loud af only a few months and years ago. Says a lot. You know who you are.6 points
-
4 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Any idea on what the ANG is going to do? Will it be similar and when do they typically release it? Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app1 point
-
Bit of useless trivia, the door gunner was originally casted as the drill Sgt , but the Gunny became a legend for his performance.1 point
-
DoD acting like an abusive husband. “I know I hurt you, but I promise I won’t do it again…I’ve changed!”1 point
-
1 point
-
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san-francisco-reparations-panel-decided-5m-per-black-person-wasnt-math-formula We "feel" like black SF ers should get 5 million a piece. For a city that never had slavery, this seems like quite a bit of money to hand out. Where will they get enough money to pay all of the black SF ers? This country will be better off when we stop separating Americans based on the color of their skin. Have we not learned anything from slavery? I hope SF continues to fail. They need to realize how stupid their ideas are. Edit: If the SF ers really want to show how sorry they are for everything this country has done, they should all pack up and leave. Afterall, they're all living on stolen land.1 point
-
1 point
-
Either you are pro vax and the rise in heart attacks is because you hate science and caught COVID, or you are anti vax and anything negative that’s happened in the last 2 years is because a vax exists. No chance COVID being in the world on its own made heart attacks go up regardless of anyone’s actions. No middle ground allowed on this forum. Get your logic out of here.1 point
-
You can be stupid and right at the same time. While we generally agree on a lot, reading your posts feels like chewing on tin foil. They are inane enough to make some smart part of my brain wish we didn't agree.1 point
-
In a word… Yes. Because we aren’t “going to war” and again that could be explained to you in about 6 minutes. You’ve spent more time arguing with me than it would take to educate yourself as to why the strategic policy makers are doing what they are doing in regards to arming Ukraine. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk1 point
-
There’s no convincing some folks here and TBH it’s not worth trying that hard. Pro tip: don’t vote for someone who shares @BashiChuni’s views in the 2024 primary or general unless you are comfortable with a radical change in policy toward Ukraine come Jan 2025. It’s not my top issue and probably not you’re either, but I at least think it’s important! And can some of my Republican friends get Ronny D a copy of some of Ronny R’s greatest hits and get him on the side of opposing Russian tyranny in Eastern Europe? Seems like it should be a layup for any Republican, but I think he’s been reluctant to go that direction due to the base being at least 45.69% in favor of completely capitulating to Putin. 🤦♂️ Reasonable Dems and Republicans can agree: Putin sucks, he’s failing in his war of conquest, and we’re getting amazing value by supporting the Ukrainians as well as actually doing the right thing morally, which in this case to me at least is crystal clear. Let’s not give up before the fight is over.1 point
-
Your opinion is noted. It’s stupid and Ill-informed but noted. Here is a chance to actually educate yourself on the why of what’s going on and how waiting for Russia to attack NATO is stupid. “Expert” in quotes, adorable. Yeah it’s probably pretty fair to say he’s a crap load more qualifiedto discuss the nuance of this and why it’s critical while maintaining an apolitical stance while you deliberately drag up Biden and Blinken. Dude routinely lampoons Biden, Trump, and Obama so he’s hardly some unqualified political narrative talking head. He isn’t the media, he’s a well circulated published author and does strategic policy seminars for billion dollar investment groups and government strategic planning. So yeah, it’s fair to say he’s probably decently qualified at his job and pretty accurate in his interpretations considering the amount of money that kind of influence its being steered by. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk1 point
-
I didn’t watch your 25 minute video. Let me guess he’s an “expert” and I should “trust the experts”. Got it. maybe I’ll watch it between ski runs today, but probably not. I’ve stated my positions and it’s my opinion. I guess the only thing left for you to do is censor me and let the media narrative take hold.1 point
-
Tell us you didn’t watch the video without telling us you didn’t watch it… Dude lays out exactly why waiting for Russia to invade Poland/Latvia/Estonia/etc is suicide at about the 6 minute mark… At 25 minutes he explains why something like Nordstream would happen intentionally… Yes we get it, it’s not Tucker Carlson but this guy briefs strategic level government officials and key notes seminars on energy and agriculture industry leaders and investors. Tucker… briefs people living in trailer parks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
$50K is a lot of money, young peeps. I recommend you sign early.-2 points