Leaderboard

“Now I don’t know what this really is” he says…but right before he says it seems like an assault on federal officers. What a 🤡

Can we all agree the next dude shouldn't be this guy.

That's what I've been wondering. Maybe the party has decided who they want to run against Desantis or Trump, and it ain't Joe. I suspect Newsom will be working behind the scenes to get this into the news, if it's as true as it seems to be.

which leads to the next question...why is the media focusing on the obvious hunter/joe corruption story NOW? the friday WH press conference was WILD with mainstream reporters constantly asking previously "forbidden" questions about corruption. so why are they being let off the leash now? because we all know the mainstream press is controlled and not independent. i think joe biden has played the useful idiot for the democratic party/deep state and his usefulness is up.

WTF. Why would Kinzinger lend support to the idea these "Nazis" are federal officers?

Time for that tent to find a young unsuspecting Boom to make it a proper woman. Lol. I wonder how many little tents from different fathers come with it?

Crackhead is a little harsh… to crackheads lol. Hunter is just a child, why can’t we just leave him alone? Why isn’t Al Sharpton up in arms about another privileged white guy (Biden, Hunter or Joe it doesn’t matter which one) is getting off without any jail time, when there are over 100,000 black brothers locked up for less.

I say we break out the Hunter Biden story to its own thread. As much as I’d like to see that scum answer for his misdoings, I’m much more interested in the usual banter and who is currently challenging Sleepy!

Strange things happen in a nation when you start losing a shooting war

I was born a yankee...now I live in Florida, but I don't follow the SEC. I'm a man without a country.

Eh, even if it’s actually over, 7 Russian aircraft and helicopters shot down by Russians, for Russians is a good day.

Let me know when progressives start moving away in droves from expensive coastal cities, you know, because they’re afraid of the effects of “climate change”. Judge people by their personal actions, not their rhetoric.

Because the Liberals control mainstream media and just like they did with the laptop, they are going to kick as much dirt as they can over the story to protect uncle Joe...retaining power is that important. They same thing happens on this forum, folks are happy to bury their heads in the sand or call it fake rather than contemplate the implications of it being real. Seriously, why wouldn't a person who has sworn an oath the Constitution, regardless of political ideology, at least want to know if the President is a criminal like his crackhead son. Even more details are being put together Hunter Biden-linked account received $5 million days after threatening messages: 'Sitting here with my father" On Aug. 4, 2017, Chinese firm CEFC Infrastructure Investment wired $100,000 to Hunter Biden’s law firm Owasco, according to a 2020 report published by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Then, days later on Aug. 8, 2017, CEFC Infrastructure Investment sent $5 million to Hudson West III, a firm Hunter Biden opened with Chinese associates. I guess the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is more Russian disinformation.

Isn’t this how “by dawns early light” started?

I mean, an ICBM is shaped like a dick. Who wouldn't want to sit on one of those?

It’s gonna be real satisfying watching Russians kill each other.

Absolutely it is a fake screenshot, it is a recreation and sadly for America the words are an exact quote from the transcript as reported by all your favorites: CNN - Hunter Biden invoked dad’s name to get paid, text shows CBS - Alleged sweeping misconduct in the Hunter Biden tax investigation, new transcripts show Washington Post - IRS whistleblower says Justice Dept. slowed, stifled Hunter Biden case The Whislteblower shared the transcripts and even more disturbing, the fact that Justice Department prosecutors denied requests to look into messages Surely, if there is even a 1% chance this is all corroborated, as an American don't you want to know the truth? Or is the liberal grip on power that important to you? I mean you are here, you swore an oath to the Constitution, didn't that mean anything? I don't want this to be true, I don't want my President and my DOJ to be corrupt but something really stinks here. The house bent Trump over the rails for a completely fake dossier and you guys don't even want to listen to an increasing list of Whistleblowers inside the IRS and DOJ that are screaming SOMETHING IS CORRUPT! Come on man! Better Geritol than Koolaid.

A sure fire way to destroy the next 2 days of your life. Getting old is bullshit. Disclaimer: No, I haven’t learned my lesson yet, and probably never will!

Is the pretend pilot finally gone? [emoji898] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You seem to be taking this pretty hard. It wasn't my intention to upset you to the point that you quit the forum forever. Be that as it may, you're a full grown adult and only you are capable of deciding what you can and cannot handle. If you choose to come back, I look forward to exchanging ideas. If you go, it was a pleasure. All the best.

It went.....

I really don't know how you post this with a straight face, have you even looked at the facts. You made comments about the Trump appointed judge...that is NO the point. The vast majority of judges agree with plea deals and this likely will as well. This is about the DOJ who is violating their own rule sets and CLEARLY administering a two-tiered system if justice to protect a crackhead son of Biden. For 20 years DOJ has been operating off precedent called the Ashcroft Rule which provides very clear prosecution guidelines: First, it requires federal prosecutors generally to pursue "the most serious readily provable chargeable offense." Let me help you, that would be the FELONY gun charge Crackhead is going to avoid by pleading guilty to a misdemeanor. And in case you think they had room to maneuver and plead down...the rule goes on to say having pursued "the most serious readily provable offense" in accordance with the first part of the policy -- generally cannot drop down to more modest charges in order to secure a guilty plea. Rather, they must compel the defendant to either plead guilty to the most serious readily provable offense, or face trial. Look no further than Rapper Kodak Black who was just sentenced to 46 months in prison for the same crime that Biden’s son has been charged with. Bradford Cohen, Black’s Florida-based attorney who has handled many cases like this, decried “After 26 years, I have yet to have a plea in a case with an illegal possession of a weapon and tax evasion, that did not come with some kind of prison sentence. Indigents charged the same way would be getting jail time,” Cohen said. Even if you somehow find a way to hand-wave the felony gun charge, the two tier system is happening on the tax evasion charge as well. Look no further than my Jersey Boy Mike "the situation" Sorrentino, in January of 2018, he pleaded guilty to one count of evading taxes on $123,000 in income. He was sentenced to 8 months in federal prison. Hunter failed to pay taxes on $1.5 MILLION, more than ten times that of Sorrentino and he is gonna walk free. This is a complete embarrassment and that fact that Liberals are ok with it...and even defend it, is shameful.

Oh, so it gets better. You achieved a scientific consensus by asking one of the doctors you referenced one question. Why do you keep digging this hole? Pro tip: before you hit the submit button, reread your post from the perspective of someone who may be critical of it. It might save you some backpedaling. Again with the red herring. Try a different tactic. You keep trying new metaphors that are easy to argue against instead of simply arguing the issue at hand. I think you've injected moon landings, crystals, aliens, election fraud, flat earth in just the last few posts. No one other than you has mentioned any of those things. It's obvious why: you're not entirely comfortable with your position on the autism issue, so you're attempting to reinforce it with irrelevant BS. So what are your personal set of rules as to what questions we can ask, where we can ask them, and who we can ask them to? Would you like to see people restricted from exploring these ideas unless they meet your specific guidelines? Help me out here, there's a word for that and I can't think of it. (Note to self, insert ad hominem attack here.) "Not receiving scheduled vaccines hurts people rather than helps them." That's an overly broad generalization. Maybe not all vaccines are bad, perhaps not all are good. Again, color me skeptical. My family and I didn't receive the last scheduled vaccine and we seem to have made out better than many who did. If you were so sure, why did you ask your doctor? You received a single opinion and you suddenly believe it's an immutable law of physics beyond reproach because she got a diploma in medicine from Phoenix University. I gave you a couple dozen links to medical research and I can give you a couple dozen more, but you're dismissing them, without reading them, all because you talked to one doc? Bear in mind, the conversation you claim to have had with one doctor is the ONLY substantive basis you've provided for your opinion. Sorry, my friend, it just doesn't make much sense. I'm not saying none exist. I'm saying you either don't know they exist, or are too lazy to cite them.

This Edit: Cough, cough....Epstein's Lolita Express. The Bills (not from Buffalo but Clinton and Gates), Trump, Prince Andrew and all of the others who hungout with that POS. They banged kids and there is enough evidence regarding this to send all of us common folk to San Quentin to be recipients of non consensual butt love for years, yet they are still free. Policitcs aside, the rich and powerful live with a different justice system. We should be fighting them intsead of each other.

I did have a wing/cc once who said everyone who gets an incentive ride will shadow the entire 12 hr day prior for mission planning, etc. And on execution day would be there the entire 12 hr day. For all the time they couldn’t be with the pilots due to lack of vault access, they would shadow the SARMs, AFE, go out on the flight line with MX, etc. 2x 12 hr “average days” was a massive eye opener for everyone who went through.

From AP News: I'd always shake my head at the budget shenanigans in the military and the wider government. "Different colors of money," "fiscal year end dollars," all that bullshit. But I get that a lot of those gyrations had some larger purpose, however inefficient. Given the above quotes though, can't we all agree we're just fucking making it up at this point? Give Ukraine 1,000 tanks, 10,000 pieces of artillery, and a whole wing of F-16's, and tell the American people it was all worth $100, because we said so. It doesn't appear that anyone cares anymore.

Hey everyone in AFSOC, Delta desires to hire 200/mo “for the foreseeable future” (AA and UAL probably have the same goal). GTFO if you can.

In the latest installment of how one acidic general officer can ruin a command...I present Unit PT and....Open Ranks Inspections...coming soon to an AFSOC near you!

Nailed it. The current version is hilariously bad. It's down at least a few times a day. Our base had a contractor who's job was PEX. He knew EVERYTHING and could fix ANYTHING with a phone call. They cut his contract last year due to apparently no complaints or issues with pex so no need for a local help desk 🙂 Now we have a remote help desk who I don't think know what PEX is.

It may not be the entire Air Force, but I'll tell you something that's wrong with ACC: ePEX. We've had it now for what... 20 years? And it's getting worse. Holy shit, PEX is literally killing those that use it daily. Our entire Information Technology enterprise is a mess. The AF puts the "IT" in "shit".

No one else wants to engage? We doing the echo chamber thing again where we get really mad at a fallacious argument? Gotta love the analysis capabilities of retired military officers. Let’s look at this. The specific issue with your argument is that you say a couple of facts, but you entirely discount very important tenets to why Americans a a whole did what they did, and then you say something wildly out there that does not logically follow: “the shot should NEVER have been MANDATED.” Very Tucker Carlson approach. The purpose of the shot was to stop transmission so that old people, who had a MORTALITY rate above the single percentages (and a similarly high severe disease rate requiring hospitalization) wouldn’t die in droves and entirely inundate the healthcare system. Everyone understood it wouldn’t kill young people, yes, even early on. The purpose was to maintain the healthcare system. https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1327 Republicans may not have liked doing something to try and protect the population, but the country as a whole was supportive of efforts to not have every one of their grandparents have a real chance of death. Here are the facts: Side effects of the vaccine were NOT well understood until it was made and distributed to a significant portion of the population, and the negative heart effects are not typical of other vaccine efforts. Those are real, and they are unfortunate. If you say otherwise, provide proof. The fact that it does not significantly limit spread was NOT understood - it initially was believed to significantly cut spread, up to 90%. It didn’t, and that is unfortunate. If you argue otherwise, provide proof. As a side note, many of you strongly pushed for ivermectin just because conservative propaganda wanted you to go against the grain, which has still been shown to have almost no efficacy and multiple bad side effects. Don’t see that addressed very often on here. The vaccine has a very high efficacy rate of reducing mortality and severe illness in those over a certain age. It reduces death rates in populations over 60 by up to 90% in many excess death analyses. Also, republican areas that refused the vaccine had significantly more excess deaths than areas that did not. You entirely discount this point. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna50883 You’ll note that many on this forum - me included - advocated for the vaccine when these things were believed: that it would limit spread, have no significant side effects (like most other vaccines), and limit mortality in vulnerable populations. It only accomplished limiting mortality (which you entirely scoff), and that’s when liberals as a population began not pushing for vaccination as the solution anymore. Especially not for young people, as they were a transmission vector whether or not they got the shots. You’ll also note that, as facts came out that showed the vaccine was not going to be effective from a transmission perspective, they were acknowledged and the push for vaccines decreased. Reminder: Trump recommended vaccination for the first year. Your anger is unjustified. Your argument is fallacious. You have taken rational thought to protect a portion of society - which, fine, you may have disagreed with, but it’s still rooted in logic and rational - and vilified it to the point of insulting your countrymen and implying we are part of what is wrong with America. That hostility and open contempt of others who looked at a problem differently than you did is what is wrong with America. And yes, I recognize there were others on the liberal side that were contemptuous. But let’s not reframe the argument, as a few folks on here including you have done, to you were always right and everyone else was always wrong and what a FUCKIN TRAVESTY. What an absolutely asinine, non intellectual take. Oh, and, as always, I am able to provide actual sources for every single thing I said. But I am going to elect to wait for you to start. Good luck.

WW3 is beginning...a neocons wet dream