It was a good article. What stood out to me is the tone suggests the Navy is somehow more serious in their approach to their training problem than the USAF is. Of course that could just by my cynical view of the Air Force at this point. With that said, it always struck me that "primary" in the Navy was lower quality than SUPT, insofar as the execution seemed very lackadaisical in their timeline execution. There was surprisingly informal nature to their training program where the timeline was just this open-ended "we'll get you there, eventually." Not surprising that they now find themselves with a production problem, that is similar - at least in nature - to ours. The one part that's always missing from these service-centric pieces, though, is the discussion over compensation. There are plenty of articles that cover the difference in airline pay vs military service, but the DOD never seems to want to tackle that part head on. It's even worse when you look at how much aviation-related bonuses and 'pays' have been inflated away over the years. That part is never talked about or acknowledged.