Homestar
-
Posts
1,491 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by Homestar
-
Not very deep.
-
Did you check a box on it and mail it back in? Did anyone?
-
Did Q tell you this?
-
Indeed, you are right. 3 SCOTUS noms will ensure his “conservative” legacy for a generation.
-
That’s my point. He couldn’t manage the barest minimum of leadership on the issue. Because he isn’t a leader. He’s a fraud and a con. Always has been. Always will be. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
-
But, I'm not wrong. And....On January 20th this national nightmare will be over.
-
Sigh.... I already told you .... I'm not going to write a white paper on this. I could list 30 things that the president could have done in response to COVID and the response would be the same..... BuT WhAt CoULd He hAvE doNe????
-
Yes. That's it. Literally.
-
Well, Trump could have established a cabinet level position on COVID response. Heck, he could have simply put his HHS secretary out front and just stepped out of the camera and shut the hell up and it would have been something at least. But there's nothing I can say that will make you step back and realize what a complete and utter failure this President has been in nearly every aspect of leadership. You would not tolerate this kind of leadership at the squadron, yet you think that it somehow works at the national level.
-
This is true....so let me rephrase: All Trump had to do was produce semi-competent leadership on the pandemic. Seriously, if the man would have simply come out in support of masks he probably wins the election. But he couldn't bring himself to even say the words. Because he's an idiot.
-
You sound as unhinged as Trump does on Twitter today. And before you go name-calling, I’m no leftist.
-
All Trump had to do was have a semi-competent response to COVID-19. He couldn’t even manage semi-competent.
-
He’s had multiple business fail. He just denies that he had anything to do with the failure, you know, like the amazing leader he is. The best. Everyone agrees.
-
So what’s the OPLAN for if Trump physically refuses to vacate 1600 Pennsylvania Ave on January 20? Like, do you call the Marines?
-
States will soon certify their results and Biden will emerge as the the winner of the election. This is what news outlets are basically reporting. But you already know this.
-
Please.
-
it's because he has thoughtful discussions in podcast format. he's not a schreeking shill forming a club of insane-o-s like the AOC-types
-
This is not the calculus I’m making here. I’m not holding out for perfect. I’m voting against a fraudster who has driven our body politic into the dirt.
-
Just as many of us are perplexed at how military members could ever support such a monumentally incompetent commander in chief. No, I’m not going to waste my time writing a Medium essay here to outline all the reasons why I think Trump is a dumbass. I don’t care why you like Trump. I’m not going to vote for him because he’s a piece of shit human being, imho, and when invited to rise to the challenge of bringing America through a crisis he failed bigly, again, imho (feel free to disagree and think what you like). I like his Supreme Court justices, sure, so the Machiavelli in me is grateful for that I guess. I also like to own the libs every now and then, but 4 years of this has be ready for a different style. But to me character still matters. A lot. And comparing Biden to Trump.....there’s nothing redeeming for me about Trump. I want to be able to tell my grandkids that I never voted for that guy. Give me Crenshaw or Give me Death.
-
Also everyone realized they didn’t want to fly like a Lt when they were a 40 y/o passed over Major (deployments, triple turning, etc).
-
Yeah maybe I should. My point: why is plural marriage among consenting adults a problem for most Americans? Don’t cheat and say welfare fraud or abuse (both of which happen in monogamous marriage). (The 18 year-old comment was tongue in cheek)
-
So I assume everyone is ok with the FLDS (think Warren Jeff’s) definition of marriage then? I mean, isn’t the age of 18 just an arbitrary number? If all parties are adults there shouldn’t be a problem then?
-
This was the opinion of, like, a loooot of people back in 2000. A lot has changed since then.
-
Haha, I would never.... You're both good dudes....it's just the image that came to mind while watching this "discussion" on psychiatry....er, public health care and the U.S. Constitution.
-
