Jump to content

LookieRookie

Supreme User
  • Posts

    763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by LookieRookie

  1. I hear the feminist screeching already
  2. Fake flying for the maf.
  3. That’s a T-38 drop, not a T-1 drop. T-1s can drop B-52s not B-1s or B-2s
  4. Zero. The recent B-1s were T-1 FAIPs.
  5. AETC is. In Georgetown north of Austin. 35 students. A SGTO right now. Contract initial pilot training (ipt) then a short T-6 syllabus. That means a super DOSS for ppl, ifr then multi tickets then go to a UPT base after. This isnt a PTN/19 AF thing. It is straight from COMAETC. Although congressional approval would be required to move ton this model and there are a whole lot of risks associated with it.
  6. We are sending studs to a contract multi program. It is happening right now. They will be taking FAA checkrides. I’ll restate this. You cant read.
  7. We are going single track. Y’all can’t read.
  8. Everyone is going to do contract initial pilot training. PPL, IFR, Multi. Then shorter T-6 direct FTU or shorter FBF. SGTO happening now T-6 is going away for everyone eventually and IPT direct T-7s for all my friends.
  9. Israel attacked Iran again
  10. The military determines is own qualifications for currency. That has nothing to do with valid FAA hours for an ATP. As well, to have the legal ability to count as hours for an ATP, the device needs an FAA ID, which C-130 sims dont
  11. This is completely wrong. I work SIMCERT stuff on staff. AMC self-certifies its sims to level C+/D “equivalency” (AMC has its dets go to the FAA course) but none of it is FAA certified. The time counts for nothing and do not put it on your apps.
  12. It was an intentional gear up landing, Randolph has no red line, daddy chill.
  13. Shooting from the hip. I like how they didn’t even socialize this with the HASC/SASC before because there still is no real plan. Just like getting after bureaucracy in accelerate change or lose. ”Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David W. Allvin acknowledged both the missing details and the need for congressional buy-in Feb. 28 during a speaking engagement at the Brookings Institution. “How we engage Congress, how we engage the stakeholders, how we look internally to our Air Force in different ways to accomplish this that aren’t fiscally intensive is going to be key to this—which is why it may be unsatisfying to some because we’re rolling this out without having the actual signed official document on what the end state looks like,” he said.”
  14. I always love the irony of Shooter stud patches. Shooters have nothing to do with guns, it’s because they are camera shooters. And I was in the Shooters.
  15. So why is he being relieved/retired/reassigned?
  16. He sounds butthurt for being passed over
  17. If a stud drops B-2s they go to T-38 PIT to be a CTP IP for seasoning, so they need to know how to fly a T-38.
  18. It is a new normal. Per HAF in coord with AFGSC, B-1s and B-2s are FBF/T-38 drops. B-52s are AMF-F/AMF-S drops. J-85s can’t support Buff drops and fighter production is prioritized and the B-52 isn’t a fast jet and doesn’t make A model IPs straight out of UPT. cue the wailing of B-52s being even more a red headed stepchild.
  19. I understand what you’re saying, but you aren’t some bastion of geopolitical wisdom. You thought Libya was a US win and there was an active nuclear program (there wasn’t). It is a failed state and a breeding ground for terrorism.
  20. Because history shows how great it’s been with the US deposing strongmen. Oh wait, it is a total clusterfuck and causes a power vacuum.
  21. Was CAT-5 the OG that scraped the CV-22 on tree canopies on approach and made it go away for himself?
×
×
  • Create New...