Hacker

The FAA recognizes military instructors performing instruction in a military program to military students while flying public-use aircraft certified on DoD Airworthiness Certificates. Trouble is found when diverging from this set of factors (e.g. the questions above about WSOs/Navs trying to log pilot time in military aircraft with their FAA certificates).

Incorrect. Yes, you can/may log the time as dual received. The FAA sees you as a student in a formal military flying training program, and it sees the instructor as providing dual instruction as part of that training program. It sees both of you as operating in accordance with the giant LOA that the FAA has with the DoD, and generally provides equivalence to the qualifications of the instructor, the material being taught, and the experience you gain as a student. Bottom line: you can legally log dual in just about anything so long as a qualified instructor is teaching it. What's questionable is if that dual time satisfies dual experience requirements for any particular FAA rating...which it probably doesn't.

There is also a former Tomcat RIO who is currently a FedEx Captain. He got much of his time by buying/owning a light twin while he was stationed out at Miramar and CFI'ing and prepping separating front-seaters for ATP checkrides! Regarding the T-6 time as a UCT stud, I say 100% valid to log both as dual received and total time.

I say bring it on. It is a different enough battlespace to warrant its own specialist force. What would Billy Mitchell do?

Yes, you are totally correct, and I should have been substantially clearer about what I meant in that sentence. Because Art 15s are Administrative punishment, they do not have the presumption of innocence or the same standards of administration or burden of proof as a civilian court. A GCM does as you say.

It isn't that simple. Going to a C-M, even if you are 100% certain of being totally innocent, is a very risky endeavor. A C-M doesn't have the same standard of conduct that a civilian court does. In a C-M, charges can be added, changed, or modified at any time during the proceedings, so basically once you open the door up, anything and everything that is discovered during testimony is in play. You can enter a C-M charged with one thing, and exit convicted of something else entirely depending on what came up during evidence and testimony. Remember that the UCMJ does not include a presumption of innocence, and depending on the charges, has different standards of evidence and conviction than what we're used to in the civilian world. Plus, a conviction at a C-M is a federal conviction, while an Art 15 isn't anything at all in the outside world. Add all that up with the witch-hunt environment which we know exists in the USAF with respect to some topics (like sexual assault, particularly), and that is the makings of a potentially very bad situation for someone accused and being offered an Art 15. During my career, I had the "opportunity" to pay a large chunk of money to two different, very well known and talented former SJAs (and now high profile civilian attorneys) and they both heavily, heavily suggested taking the Art 15 rather than risking a Court-Martial.

I like to be intellectually lazy and frame every problem in terms of race as well as decide that racism is the only possible root cause.

That is a late 80s/early 90s patch.

I took the MBTI when I was in ROTC, and turns out I'm STFU.

Correlation vs causation: what is it? Note for the OP: Civilian attorneys are better than most ADCs no matter what race, gender, or any other immutable characteristic unrelated to our character.

An "Afghani" is a unit of monetary currency in Afghanistan. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_afghani A tornado in Afghanistan would be called an "Afghan Tornado".

Really? In the age of Google? https://militarypay.defense.gov/Pay/Retirement/ and https://militarypay.defense.gov/Pay/Retirement/COLA/

The "way too many variables" argument cuts both ways. "The spreadsheet" also doesn't include a single furlough, merger, or bankruptcy...which are not exactly unheard of in the airline industry, especially since most of us will spend 20+ years flying for an airline after we leave the military. The numbers themselves have always only been a single datapoint to be considered in a larger context of other life, financial, and career factors.

Military pensions are increased annually based directly on the CPI (e.g. the actual inflation rate). This is part of what makes it a very valuable asset, especially compared to (what are left of) corporate pensions, most of which are fixed payments which lose value in inflation every year.

Yes, T-38 students do both things successfully daily, and have for the last 50 years.

In WWII the RAF did not consider shooting down the V-1s as typical aerial kills. Instead, they had their own separate list of victories, and even had "V1 Aces".

Just another indicator of how self-indoctrinated AF leadership is; pilots are saying LOUD AND CLEAR precisely what is wrong with the AF that is making them leave, and the Generals are intentionally choosing not to tackle any of those things to help fix retention. Maybe if we start poisoning the well for their job prospects on the outside, we'll keep them in. YGBSM. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, Generals.

More A-A kills than I have. How many do you have?

Most definitely not urban legend, but there probably isn't anyone on AD who actually served with anyone who this happened to. I personally know three guys who were labeled "BENT" (Bonus Eligible, Non-Taker) in the early 90s and were subjected to "boots on the ramp" restriction.

I was at BAF when she was the Hog SQ/CC there, and I can assure you that was not the predominant opinion among the people who she Commanded.

If you get outside the metro areas, California is more gun-totin' red state than anything else.

It wasn't that long ago that there wasn't any such thing as a strat on an OPR...and somehow people still got promoted and had cool jobs (oh, and flew airplanes providing combat airpower too).

You give airline management -- the ones making these decisions -- far too much credit when it comes to their insights and strategy. Rarely does it extend beyond a simple cost/benefit strategy, and they have entire floors of actuaries and accountants crunching those numbers constantly. Single pilot, remotely piloted, and autonomous piloted aircraft will happen in a flash just as soon as they are cheaper to buy, operate, and maintain than regular ol' humans are (and the regulatory and contractual blocks to them are overcome). It will have very little to do with what passengers want beyond what they will and won't spend money on.

*Every* decision at the airlines is about the money.