Hacker

For the past 20-30 years, handguns were the FEBA for the gun control debate. Since Heller took handgun bans off the table, gun control advocates have had to shift their efforts elsewhere. This is why, at least in this latest 2012-2013 gun control push, it is scary looking guns (which are not used in any significant number of crimes) that fires are being focused on. If it weren't for Heller, I guarantee that some sort of handgun ban would be part of the legislative push.

This scenario is not a straw purchase, nor is it indicative of a lie on a 4473. He is purchasing the rifle for himself -- what he does with it after he purchases it, including giving it to the Tuscon PD, does not constitute a straw purchase by any definition.

So, he is publicly advocating doing something that is illegal in most localities (and something not recommended by any legitimate firearms self defense technique) as a primary methodology for self defense? Well done, Joe. Guns are for threatening, apparently. I wonder what his plan is for that ol' double barrel when the warning shots don't scare the intruders off...or if there are more than two of 'em....or if he misses....or there's a misfire/hangfire. I love the part about ARs being harder to aim and harder to use. Isn't the argument for banning firearms with pistol grips is that it makes them easier to "spray from the hip"? YGBSM.

There's a magazine on the Garand, too, it just happens to be fixed inside the stock.

I'll repost the wise words of a then-Major (now a Brig Gen) who had similar critiques about the way the USAF handled medals during ALLIED FORCE in '99 (posted to David Hackworth's website back in the day). Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose:

No, the U-28 crowd had their own issue with aerobatics, which was dealt with entirely differently than it was with Liberty.

Dislike. Veterans are not "super citizens" who should be entitled to any more rights or privileges than the rest of America. The same goes for law enforcement personnel. There is only one class of citizen in America -- one to which all of the liberties and rights apply to.

Amazing and frightening book, most definitely.

Bear Safes in OKC is an excellent option.

Huggy, not sure if you are trying to promote the practice or stain it with that photo of Steve Ritchie...?

I think the most important tribute any of us in the AF can make to men like Raz and of the AF's Vietnam warrior generation is to not allow the heritage they made (and which they carried on from the warriors who had gone before them) to die on the vine because of political correctness. I have a collection of about 60 years' worth of USAF songbooks, going all the way back to Korea. Warriors singing obscene songs -- despite what some might have you believe to further their own agendas -- is most certainly not some kind of recently-manufactured-invented heritage. Turns out, when warriors came back from risking their pink butts in MiG alley and killing enemies to freedom, they liked to unwind by drinking, smoking, and singing off-color songs.

Hopefully all that Duracoat stays good looking after they actually shoot that thing. Despite the mixing of at least three different aircraft type markings from two different time periods and theaters of operation, too. Reminds me of this old air racer (which was intentionally painted as a mash-up of as many different Mustang squadron and group markings that he could pack on to one aircraft):

Just as an aside, the book Steve is giving away is an excellent read -- a first person account of flying a Thud mission in Vietnam.

Very, very sad. I considered Raz one of my mentors, having started to correspond with him in the late 90s via the old rec-aviation-military USEnet newsgroups, where Raz was a frequent poster. I corresponded with him frequently then, and continued to do so for years as I went to UPT and became a fighter pilot myself, including some very poignant conversations while I was deployed for OIF during Shock and Awe in 2003. Those of you that have heard the "A Night At The Bar With The Boys" CD of fighter pilot songs mentions Raz by name as one of the old-school songmeisters. Great fighter pilot...wrote some fantastic books....someone who will be righteously missed. How'd he go? Here's an excerpt from the old 435th FTS doofer book (RIP doofer books, too...) from the days when Raz was an AT-38B LIFT instructor at Holloman.

Is there a point to posting all those Jessie Abbate pics, other than she is attractive and a damn good shot?

Benefit to what? No, there is no practical difference other than what you do for a living.

How's the view from 1990?

Just as "outrageous and scary" as an AR-15 appears to people who want the AWB, and with similar (lack of) rational reasoning behind it. Just because someone is scared of it doesn't make their fear logical or rational. Biden can say just about anything he wants, but he is also not the person who can actually execute any of the "recommendations" he makes because those recommendations to have to adhere to any particular laws...which EOs do. Biden couldn't even say what the EO might do, because he has no idea. It is some gun owners who seem to be taking that comment and turning it into a 12-foot-tall monster in the closet, mostly based on their own lack of understanding of the law. EOs have very specific guidelines that include not being able to create new law where there was not one previously. That is a fact. What someone is scared of them being is irrelevant.

Feel free to post up some examples of those EOs that created new law.

What exactly are you worried about with an EO? EOs cannot make new law, they can only clarify/focus existing law.

Fortunately, that is so obviously unconstitutional by Heller's standard.

None required there.

Despite the article that is saying that the gun control faction is in disarray, that by no means that this threat is over. If the Feinstein bill -- or even a gutted shadow of it -- passes and is signed, it will still be another significant move away from a crucial right. Stay on the pressure to your elected representatives, ESPECIALLY now what the summary of Feinstein's proposal is out. She basically proposes limiting gun owners to choose from anything designed before 1900. We're all going to be able to "bear arms" like the Colt SAA and the Winchester 1894 lever action, and that will be called "sensible restrictions". The Cowboy Action Shooters and the hunters will shrug their shoulders and not care about the loss of ability to buy or own a Glock or AR....right up until some idiot shoots up a movie theater with a pair of six-shooters, and then the leftists will be asking for another round of "sensible restrictions" on the "high power handguns" that are only "designed to kill people". They'll be playing the clip from Dirty Harry in an endless loop, showing how we need to get "the most powerful handgun in the world, the .44 magnum" off the streets! DO IT FOR THE CHILDREN!

Probably a lot more than you think (and not just for what you are saying about common criminals and gang bangers) -- nice article on that here: https://reason.com/archives/2012/12/22/gun-restrictions-have-always-bred-defian

Pretty bad taste, and obviously done with a huge anti-firearms agenda and bias.... ...but that's 'freedom of the press' for ya.