Hacker

FWIW, Huggy, I believe that he was referring to Yeager and not you..... But, threat reaction observed.

Oh, yes, I've been bitter for quite a few years, thanks. Currently located at one of those GO#1 locations...probably part of the root cause right there.

Nobody was forced to go to UPT and enter into such indentured serditude. In fact, 99.69% of guys beating down the door to get to UPT would sign their wife and child away just to get the opportunity to do what you and I do. It's part of the game. If you haven't realized that up to this point, then the joke's on you. Everyone should know this and make choices accordingly from the first time they enlist in and including every decision made thereafter. Caveat emptor. Really? When operating in congested 'wild west' airspace, you're watching your TCAS closely? How about ya try this one one for size: check 12 o'clock and clear your flightpath. Remember that one from day 1 of UPT?

So, it took place in three parts, but was 'uninterrupted'? Is this TPS logic? Just because someone has the opportunity and venue to speak their mind doesn't mean they should do it.

That's interesting, because there are a lot of aviators who have no respect for a guy who is a self-important windbag who once accomplished some amazing acts of airmanship but unfortunately eclipsed all of that with his enormous ego.

Of course they can. PS, there's an enormous portion of the USAF flying community that doesn't wear the flag on their flight suits.

The series of photos on AvWeb seems to indicate he's not. I think that the stuff you're seeing in that dirt nap photo is the engine spitting out all of the fod that the intake is gobbling up. https://www.avweb.com/news/airventure/EAAAirVenture2011_F16RunwayOverrun_205088-1.html

...which is why I'm guessing you're not an accident investigator.

As has been said before, FENCE In. This is Big Blue standard. If you're not ready for shit like this and constantly taking whatever measures you can to protect yourself, you're wrong. Remember, the AF is a big, inefficient, reactive bureaucracy that doesn't care about the big picture nor about you. Adjust your priorities accordingly.

Yes, it is possible. In order for a Major who is passed over for promotion twice to continue service to 20 years, a board must approve his continued time in. In the past, this approval has been basically rubber-stamped and assumed. Just this year that process is less rubber stamp and more actual evaluation of records. The result is that some passed-over Majors in some specific year groups have not been offered continuation and have to get out. The sky is not falling.

Is it really a surprise that, collectively and over time, that Big Blue can be more retarded than you can as just one individual in just one career span? The possibilities for idiocy are endless!

Based on flying alone, definitely Bagram. Anyone who has flown in both squadrons is in complete agreement that the mission, customers, and flying out of BAF is much more interesting than at KAF. If anyone has SIPR and can look at the monthly roll-ups can see objective indicators of this, too.

That's quite seriously not a benefit in any way which should influence the decision. The stick-and-rudder aspect of flying the airplane is only about 10% of the mission...plus, unless those people are actually actively flying a T-6, they would require a requalification before being able to fly the hypothetical AT-6B. In the fighter world, this non-tactical portion of the flying training is about 5 or 6 rides, even for a B-Course, before the Form 8 instrument check. Again, not exactly what you'd call any kind of significant benefit. More significant would be the numbers of CAS and COIN experienced pilots who could enter the training pipeline, of which the other 90% of the training challenge consists of, and which it does not matter if the airplane is a Beechcraft or a Tucano. The only somewhat benefit to buying the Beechcraft would be the ability to partially follow the established logistics system for the T-6, as well as economies of scale for the logistics system for the entire T-6 family of aircraft.

Haven't seen any dislike or prohibition of friday shirts in any corner of the fighter/trainer world that I've been in over the last 15 years.

Exactly -- some of us aren't on a tail-chase for the biggest dollar. Some of us like flying and want to keep doing it professionally.

Recommend you also throw this analysis in to this thread on Airline Pilot Central: https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/military/60658-should-i-stay.html There are a number of things that changed since I did that comparison in 2007...but the bottom line remains the same. Note that my analysis DID NOT include a job with a reserve unit in the "get out at 10 years" scenario, and that was intentional. That was based on some advice I received from a friend who was (is) flying for the Guard: Lots of good discussion (and alternate viewpoints) in these threads: Initial thread from 2007: https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/military/14632-should-i-stay-should-i-go.html Similar discussion from 2010: https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/54145-grass-greener-military-airlines.html

I've never even seen a result of this "developmental vector" at any time in my career.

I think that Jumper was in much the same vein as Fogleman.

That's right up there with ABMs who thought they should fill the 'Mission Commander' role on the MC-12Ws, too.

FENCE In means understand what the threat is and be prepared for it...be prepared to fight it, AS WELL AS accept the consequences of losing that fight. If you're emotionally prepared for the worst options, then you won't be caught off guard when the worst happens.

This shouldn't be news to ANYONE wearing a USAF uniform. Everyone should have understood that all contracts are 1-way (you have to abide by them, Uncle Sam can abrogate/change/revoke/modify at any time and in any manner) from the moment they put pen to paper on enlistment documentation. FENCE in and protect yourself.

Nothing to see here. It was all just a language barrier mix-up!

What timeframe would most of the non-continued O-4s we're talking about in this thread have to separate (in terms of calendar year, not years of service).

Ops checked as bad:

It's been tried countless times in every MAJCOM that I've been in. Yet, somehow when "that guy" leaves, it goes right on.