Hacker

Yet more idiocy in the age of pilots taught to blindly follow TCAS instead of adhering to their basic responsibility to see and avoid.

So, in other words, is was just like every other personnel action the AF has planned and executed in the last 25 years.

Of note is that the mid 90s brought the opposite situation -- those who were in ROTC when the bankings were taking place ended up getting sent somewhere other than UPT, then in the late 90s they significantly increased the UPT slots that were open to active duty. Today, you have an entire generation of pilots who were trained in (and performed a tour in) a non-flying AFSC. Lots of MX-officers-turned-pilots in the O-4 and O-5 ranks currently.

You recently heard incorrectly.

The irony is that the girl in the pic isn't a pilot. She's a model that went flying with that South American AF (I think it was the Brazilians, but I can't VID the marking on the tail...of the aircraft). EDIT: Here are some links to some other very long threads of military chick pix: https://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?130786-Pictures-of-women-in-the-military-police%28read-the-1st-post!!!%29 https://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-5967-postdays-0-postorder-asc-sid-a1b65996fd4fc01bf559c15f22508266.html

Don't think of it as a commitment...think of it as job security in a terrible economic and work environment.

That's kind of unusual for an RAF dude. They're usually less "reg" focused and more "get the job done" focused. Is he a pilot?

Time to get that MBA, Hoss!

At Vance in the 38 drop there were also 2 x BUFFs, a C-21 to Ramstein, a KC-135 to Mildenhall.

YAAFM Pretty amazing that you were able to be inside their minds and know how their 'tactical focus' was. Nowhere in this thread did anyone say that it was impossible. It was bitching about something we believed to be inconvenient and not worth the inconvenience.

He's not talking about that happening today -- the bankings happened in the early 1990s, and that's the drop that he posted. Notice the C-141 and the KC-10 to Seymour as indications that's not exactly a recent UPT drop.

So, double-digit SAMs and Flankers are a figment of my imagination?

Both copy the 9-lines and coordinates. The lead WSO is the primary talker with the JTAC.

Uh huh. There's also a WSO in the jet who is not actively participating with flying formation who can look at the placard. Thanks for playing, though.

I believe the term you're looking for is "BLU-113" and "BLU-113/B".

Yeah, I'm sure that will remain on the forefront of my thoughts throughout the tactical portion of the sortie so that I'll be able to recall it 3 hours later when I'm precontact. I mean, it's not like I actually have anything else of importance to think about during that time.

Just for S and Gs, try finding and reading that thing while you're also flying in the precontact or contact position. Or at night. The last thing you want is one of your receivers going skulls-down for 10 seconds or so just to find that placard and decipher what the hell it says.

Laken-pain standard. Everybody was probably too busy doing their jobs to go watch a movie at the base theater.

This is officially the most retarded thread currently on BaseOps.

If you're wondering why people are commenting about your experience level, it's because of comments like this. I have seen plenty of pilots lose quals over screw ups. I have never seen (or heard of) an officer being "demoted" or having a "loss of rank" or loss of "privileges" over an in-flight incident. The other half of this that you seem to demonstrate a lack of understanding of is that there is a significant difference between a mistake and a crime. The AF flying community is very good about differentiating the difference between when someone makes a legitimate error, and when someone does something knowingly wrong. Most of the time when errors are made, there may be a minor slap on the wrist (like a grounding or loss of qual) and a penalty "mea culpa" in front of the squadron (also very handy in helping other pilots to not make the same mistake), but that's where it ends. I have seen this even when the "oops" resulted in a Class A (after the board has made it's ruling, of course).

YAAFM

Errrr, no.

Hopefully you are talking only specifically about OEF and post-2003 OIF.

This.

Unfortunately true. Guess you've gotta read the citations on those!