BFM this

Then less reviving old threads and more finishing up the 20 or so hours to get your PPL. Problem solved.

https://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/goodbye-blame-bush-hello-blame-trump/ This one?

-$150 in Hampton Roads VA Grandfathering FTW Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Ten years ago, and these rules will sway back and forth with the winds at AETC bases, but... I did some light flying at the local glider club and FBO while at UPT. Just did the hazardous activities worksheet, got the counseling from my flight commander to not do anything stupid,...beyond that it wasn't treated any different than riding my motorcycle or boating with friends. ymmv

You are asking for pain. Unnecessary, over-scripted, high threat (dialed back in the past few years, but nonetheless) pain. Why? Why are you getting into flying? Ego? Family pressure? Is Fun anywhere in the calculus? My recommendation: don't sweat UPT. Attitude is everything in that program. Every SIE or 89 elimination that I remember came down to attitude. My own ups and downs came down to attitude. Want to knock some of your flying rust off as a form of anxiety therapy? Do some fun learning. Good ideas: -get a Glider add on -tail wheel endorsement -upset training/acro lessons -local checkout to take the girlfriend for a sunset flight You're going to spend the next several years getting nut punched and occasionally asking if this is still fun. You are literally asking to practice your anxiety. Don't: get an instrument ticket or commercial training (see above) Coming from the guy that had all his ratings going in, and thankfully missed the IFT paintrain. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

While making no excuses for the train wreck that was TAMI-21, those that were affected, in general, followed two paths: -Some recatted. While there are varying accounts about whether they were sold a bill of goods, most did so with clear vision, and are thriving; WIC, school, staff, etc. I've met one or two, that suffered buyers remorse, but it wasn't wholesale. -Non-recatters thrived in place, and got jets starting in late '12 early '13 timeframe. -Same story with the original UPT-D's; first of which are often WIC grads, arriving at staff/school (recats) while the rest are in manned a/c. BL: I'm not arguing against the shitshow that was TAMI and UPT-D--those initiatives poisoned the well for a generation to come.

I don't know. The first batch of UPT-dct-RPAs shook it off, and thrived both in the suck, and their follow-on's for the most part.

How, in today's information age, could this even be a question? Is your leadership's office located under a rock? On the moon? The fact that this kind of buffoonery still exists in broad daylight... Your leadership should be publicly identified and provided counseling behind the nearest woodshed. I'd love to know what base/wing, but that would unnecessarily highlight you. FFS...

AFI 16-1301 no longer has specific verbiage, which it did when I crossed this bridge... Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Regs might have changed in the 12 years since I bypassed SV-80 with my NAS Brunswick certificate. Find the source reg directing the SERE requirements (which looks like what they were quoting) Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

SERE? No. Who's telling you otherwise? Might have to dig into the actual regs (get used to it, part and parcel of the AF experience) Water survival? Yes. (I know, you've been trained to swim by the worlds largest Navy: the AF doesn't give a shit.) Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Yeah, CPIP had all of those suggestions as well. Obviously, they didn't make the cut. Or criteria. Or something. Because, you know, Offutt, of course! ...Kirtland? Wtf is wrong with you, man? Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

That's weird. Is there excess Phase III capacity at SPS? Under producing Phase II? Regardless, I'd bet it's a welcome upgrade for the lucky two (Enid to WF). Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

First off, the AF is telegraphing its punch: which base clearly shows that the CPIP executive summary was skimmed briefly before the entire report was fed into the shredder in keeping with the highest of AF tradition? The MCE base is going to be Offutt. The second base will be Eglin, to take advantage of the ranges. Yes, Slingblade would correctly point out that you now have two locations in the same time zone, against all common sense, reason, and published conclusions of the CPIP, to which the AF will reply: Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Well, he said "no offense" which lies somewhere between "with all due respect" and academic non-attribution. Sounds legit.

I got asked by my teenage daughter my thoughts on the massive flow of refugees from the Middle East. I explained that should trouble arise, we might make a similar journey. But at some point, when the guns had faded from earshot, and I could calculate a certain level of safety for my loved ones, that we would part ways. That is the difference between our culture, and others that have been ground into an apathetic flight response.

Nope. Too early for predictions? In 2020 there will be another round of CPIP, which will reflect back on AF, GAO, and Rand studies published in 2008, 2012, 2014, and...2016. And around we will go!

Stayed with it. Ballsy

No arguments here. My beloved MAJCOM is the reason we're going through the third iteration of "fixing" the RPA business model, but I'd put my next paycheck on a table in Vegas that, yes, the RPA community will still look like a Vietnamese Under Armor sweatshop when the issue gets raised again in 6-9 years.

You don't have to accept continuation if it is offered. If continuation is offered, it only means that you don't get separation pay on the way out.

There's still a lot of commanders out there with the anachronistic mindset that no matter how under-resourced, everything will get done. Ok, but you're paying the cost out of somewhere, even if you refuse to acknowledge or quantify that cost. Typically it's on the backs of Airmen (creative leave policies, long days, the list goes on). But hey, MY SQ/GP/WG got everything done, that's what really matters.

Actually capitalizing on a stable of T-38 trained bodies by allowing them IFF slots would open up all manner of worm cans, not the least of which would lead to minor slowing of the 11F tsunami. Take your common sense elsewhere.

For every year that you sign up for the bonus, you are committed. Seems simple enough.

Prior: tell me how I didn't have the same commitment?

Shuddup Nav!