BFM this

Liquids posts didn't read anything remotely like Chang's. Not even close.

Flachettes. It's whats for dinner.

Here I thought it was an AFPAK Hands RIP.

After a couple of weeks in the limelight, I wonder if the curly quotation marks commander has had any feedback from his boss and/or had some self reflection? ...probably not is my guess.

Pulling 4 Gs at a cabin altitude of 10k' without supplemental O2? Yep, that's bound to give you a headache.

While a lot of these ideas can be dismissed within contemporary lines of thinking, the scope of the problem demands consideration of some pretty stretched thinking. Our way forward is going to be a massive upheaval, along the lines of Sierra Hotel mixed in with some senior leadership Darker Shades of Blue.

That is THE problem, but from the opposite perspective. HHQ, all the way down to the wing level, simply have no concept of the time tax they levy with each good idea the fairy shits downhill. Oh, we need to crunch training squares sideways to fit this slide deck narrative? No worries, have the Ops Groups cull the data. CAF days? Of course! To many O&M days anyway. And the list goes on. YES: cut staffs and make leaders lead without worrying about straight quotation marks, or otherwise superfluous bs. Three execs including a Patch for one OG. That's when I knew the train had come off the rails.

AFPAK Hands could sure use someone of your caliber.

I seem to remember, just before the 11F issue crested the horizon, when OGs were actually saying that RPA stink was the coin of the realm; in just a few years it will be tough to get on the command list or make O6 without it. FISH ON!

This is already the business model at Classic Assoc TFI locations. And at least in the ACC corner, it's a fucking abortion. Its seemed to work better in UPT, FTU, and RPA communities. Combat coded FS? Yeah, not so much. Active assoc also seems to work a lot better.

Which at least raises the question of the need for a FWQ program. Cobra-->Fighters, sure: FWQ + IFF Army C-12 --> KC-135 ....? At the very least it should be a syllabus with liberal SPA opportunity. My only point is that we (AF) bend over backwards trying to avoid the easy button.

Good luck selling that to Iran and SA

Got a call from the guy on the porch a few months ago. First time that's happened in 14 years. We all know: he's not the decision maker, just the flesh peddler, but it was something. I've seen about a half dozen dudes in his seat, some good, some less so. One of his recent predecessors actively tried to fuck me and my family royally as though it was his J.O.B. Nothing personal; needs of the AF, right? One data point does not a trend make, but it's a step in the right direction.

Never gets old

What monkey vid? That's a Strike Eagle squadron.

What do YOU mean by "what do you mean by black jets"?

If the BIT is post-IFF (and they're single) send them TDY to fly black jets for those months. No begging required.

Meh, gotta entertain ourselves between track/assignment nights.

https://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/1048679/af-selects-shaw-afb-as-the-preferred-location-to-host-a-new-rpa-unit.aspx Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

The Air Force is a bureaucracy. The one truth with any bureaucracy is that it seeks growth. If the MSG/WG/CC posts $XX,XX3,### cash flows one year, posting $XX,XX4,### cash flow the next is a feather in the plume. QoL, strategic need, and stewardship can all be damned. See also: Joint Basing. ETA: anyone who thinks that RPA CPIP, 11F retention, or Sq re-vitalization are anything but min-run eye-wash initiatives is deluding themselves. Exhibit A: Shaw MCE Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Already cresting the horizon in black jet AdAir. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Haha, having visited both Robins and Beale in the last year, all I can say is,...well, at least they're not Del Rio by the Sea. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

CG: what locations did you have in mind? Our current UPT locations are specifically located under sparsely traveled airspace, leaving plenty of room for MOAs. I'm all about what you're suggesting, and I've been vocal here about the colossally stupid basing decisions in the RPA community--those could be installed in any office building/base/location--pretty much anywhere you can build a SCIF . Not so with trainers or any MDS that needs some form of range space. Best example is RND, where the daily struggle with San Antonio approach and Houston Center creates real production impacts. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Uninstall, reinstall FTW. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums