ClearedHot

It was indeed units and a clear violation Pulte asserted that James obtained a “conforming loan through the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac” that was only available for properties with four units or less. Records also indicate that James has “consistently misrepresented the same property as only having four units in both building permit applications and numerous mortgage documents and applications,” Pulte said.

Letitia James is in deep crap...this is not some contrived first-ever interpretation of the law used to attack a political foe, this is real fraud...and it gets uglier as they peel back the onion....BLUF - She married her father? The big-ticket item was a property she told banks in 2023 was her primary residence, despite the fact that it was in Virginia and despite being a statewide public office holder in the state of New York at that same time and primarily residing in the state of New York, Not only did she lie, she had some help from others in her office to make it seem legitimate. In the document, James attested, “I hereby declare I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence.” The document was witnessed by First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy and a New York state secretary — and notarized. Not only did he falsely declare Virginia as her state of residence, on numerous documents she declared her father as her husband to meet the federal loan guarantees requirements.

NIL is destroying college sports.

Lots of guessing focused around our doctrine of airpower, often it is more useful to approach from the adversary's state of mind. In many ways China holds the high ground in the Taiwan fight. With the mainland just over 100 miles it is far easier for them to project airpower over the island. Knowing we face the tyranny of distance problem, they are looking for ways to push us back as far as possible which is why they have developed things like the DF series of missiles. AEW platform like the KJ-500 and the new KJ-700 further feed that doctrine. I would not be surprised if the J-36 falls more into the category of a missile dump truck with VERY long legs.

It's true...AMF. Dude is a complete douche canoe and a disciple of Cat 5.

It came straight form the mouth of the then AFSOC Commander who was by trade a Pavelow guy. Why do folks think this can't be used in the big fight against China? I can think of 69 missions it can do in that fight. During the recent Special Air Warfare Symposium the current AFSOC Commander mentioned putting Small Cruise Missiles on them. Pop up out of a dirt strip on an off axis and dramatically complicate the calculus of the Chinese. Also, the Taiwan scenario will include operations on the periphery that will have a big impact on the fight. There are 10,000+ little islands between the PI, Indonesia and Vietnam...

$100M bomber destroyed by a $500.00 drone.

Still up form the low...lost about 33% of yesterday's gain. Buying the dips...I had a lot of cash sitting on the sidelines.

And after today?

UFB!

Not sure I agree...while expired tags and non-working tail lights are often used by bad cops to justify pretextual stops, if you didn't pay for your registration what are the odds you don't have insurance either. I do not agree on parking with a caveat, at an expired meter...absolutely. But in my hood I see soccer mom's park in the fire lane of the SmallMart and run inside to grab an item or two. I also see the same thing with handicapped parking...didn't get to worked up about that until a few months ago when I saw a double amputee trying to get out of his van in a normal parking space when all the handicapped spots were full. In one of the parking spots was my buds wife...he is a 100% SDV and can barely walk, but he wasn't in the car, she used his car to run errands and used his handicapped plate out of convenience to park in a spot.

Instead of giving heavy deployers more time with their families I think ACC should use that day for full Class A open ranks inspections...with demerits.

It's legit. Hey acting SECAF, tell me your were a douche bag missileer who never deployed and never felt the impact on families without telling me.

On numerous occasions I've seen cops in my neighborhood turn their lights on when a car coming the other way was speeding, then turn their lights off and continue when the speeder slows down. Officers always have discretion and examples like you have above can be effective. However, to blatantly state as a policy that the police will not pull people over for minor violations is a license to commit minor violations.

New York proposal would ban police from making traffic stops for minor violations to pursue 'racial equity'

It is going to be ugly when that house of cards crumbles.

It is Blue Chip bargain time.

At Laughlin it was a State Trooper that ended the Highway men...he was staking out what he thought was kids drag racing and leaving the tire marks on the road when a T-38 came along and did a touch and go.

Still not as bad as the Highway Men and the Turtle club at Laughlin back in the day....IYKYK.

The latest exercise around Taiwan shows how urgent the China problem really is. They have SERIOUS issues and as just released their population decreased for a third year in a row. Peter Zeihan has a good outline of how the decrease is going to impact world-wide production of goods.

Same, including Harvard which was an ass tear of indoctrination, but I digress. Lets rationally discuss this, I won't call you an activist Libtard, don't call me a Magahat (for the record I don't believe either of us fall in those categories. First and foremost, I am a rule of law guy and I agree, there was supposed to be due process (it separates us from the savages), and there was a a deportation order just not back to country of origin as you pointed out. Did they break the order, yes. The explanation is it was an error, I am hoping that is true because BOTH sides should about lawful orders...again the savages part. I think there is a bigger discussion about activist judges like this. While I am NOT in favor of impeaching a judge simply because you don't like his or her ruling, there is something fundamentally wrong when a single person (who was not even elected), can stop federal policy...even the President doesn't have that much authority in most cases. The situation is exacerbated when appellants go judge shopping. Even the 12 circuit courts are made up of panels...we have to fix that part of the system. It is disingenuous for EITHER side to scream rule of law when BOTH sides do it. Lets be real, maybe I missed it, but I don't recall you objecting when Biden opened the border or when he forgave student debt - Even when SCOTUS told him he couldn't! At the end of the day we have to find some middle ground, I believe that is what the framers wanted....discussion, compromise, logical thought and finally an agreement in the middle.