Clark Griswold

Watched these DCS gameplays on a Falklands 2.0 scenario(s), found them a tad interesting: and a future scenario

Doubt they do (the admin) but as to fighters my WAG is the PLAAF is / might be interested in seeing how the Brits react and gathering technical data on NATO systems, tactics, etc... No doubt the Chinese produced JF-17s (if the Argies choose to acquire will insist on ones with little Pakistani involvement as Myanmar is less than happy with their JF-17s with serious problems) will be there to gather trons on Typhoon radar, ECM, Meteor missile capes, etc... How applicable to a potential Taiwan scenario is that? Don't know but the partial analogy to their desire to take an island 90 nm from their coast is there

A few JF-17s aren’t likely to let them conquer the Falklands but I wonder if the PLA would wanna try a rehearsal there before they try in their own backyard Argentina Wants to Buy Chinese Fighter Jets https://www.breitbart.com/latin-america/2023/03/16/argentina-wants-to-buy-chinese-fighter-jets/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How not to fight a war:

Interested story from the good old days https://theaviationgeekclub.com/foxhound-vs-blackbird-former-mig-31-pilot-explains-how-to-intercept-and-shoot-down-an-sr-71-mach-3-spy-plane/amp/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not drunk but this was interesting Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Copy all @Lawman @DirkDigglerand I think those are likely causes not the platform per se It's a mixed bag of reviews on it, some articles said it did well in Syria (lower threat environment) and then there's the disappointing performance in Ukraine, seems from scanning a few it's a matter of training, tactics and modern sub-systems versus overall concept. Not rooting for Russian AF also just to state that clearly as they are the only ones flying it there.

The Fullback is not having a great record in Ukraine-Russian war: Russia's Su-34 Fullback Fighter-Bomber: Paper Tiger or Killer in Ukraine? - 19FortyFive Kinda surprised but article gives some ideas about why that is, lack of modern weapons for the platform, training, friendly fire, mx issues, etc... but still interesting it has not been more survivable. Is the heavy fighter/bomber concept viable? Our version that was used heavily in combat, the F-105 in Vietnam, is largely derided but I think if you look at the whole record in context the Thud actually did well considering its design and the threats it faced (it flew 75% of the strikes over North Vietnam) and still had a slightly better than 1 to 1 kill ratio against MiGs (27.5 vs 17). All that said, is this just a fault of the Su-34 not being equipped with the modern systems to fight/survive and supported by the other enabling assets or is the concept wrong?

Good read on a decent idea methinks but likely low order of probability: Here’s How Feasible The U.K. Giving Eurofighters To Ukraine Actually Is (thedrive.com) Not a bad livery for it though...

As long as CAs keep flying premium solving their problems for them I doubt anything Unless APA and the AA flight crews stop flying premium they (management) are not under enough pressure Just my two cents from the outside on MLOA Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not saying you said that, I should have phrased it better but besides Russia or China who else could fly a UAV in that area? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Really? Looking at the range from the PRC, I don't think they have anything that could make the round trip... Russia? Fox is now saying it was Fox-2'd at 40k

This is exactly what homeless people need, more weed and booze... Canadian city councilor asks for 'weed and alcohol' donations for homeless camp, calls the donations 'incredible' - TheBlaze It sounds like an episode of Trailer Park Boys...

It's real

Same. I don’t get the ambivalence towards fixing problems in our own house and neighborhood vs some sort of St George in retirement syndrome where we go looking for very difficult if not impossible missions 7,000 miles from home. USA, Canada plus 2 regional neighbors with reasonable goals (secure major port, gov buildings in capital, distribute aid, etc…) should be feasible for phase 1. Phase 2 long term development plan Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So, there's a country starting to dissolve in our hemisphere, not far from our shores and I've been casually following the story. It's awful, it's becoming a problem spilling over its borders and starting to directly affect us vis a vis illegal immigration and becoming an ungoverned space that will become a base for illegal activities throughout the Caribbean and Americas. Do we intervene, stabilize and prevent the collapse of the state? I'm fairly cynical on the idea of nation building but I'm not for letting problems just build in our sphere and letting us be affected by them when we could prevent it. I'm not sure it's nation building we should do versus just plain old occupation / stabilization and stating this is done in the interest of the USA, not bending logic and trying to spin it but just stating matter of fact we're doing this to prevent a larger humanitarian problem and reasonably trying to help the Haitians. Fear, violence and chaos grip Haiti as gangs seize control | PBS News Weekend Other nations have said they would help or participate in a stabilization operation, the UN would be involved, and the goals would be very realistic. Thoughts?

China acting a bit like a little kid... China is mad at the US for blasting its suspected spy balloon, but a few years ago, state TV bragged its fighter pilots could shoot one down (msn.com)

I think your point is valid but I think sometimes there is value in stirring the pot. He’s a 4 star of a MAJCOM, he expressed the martial spirit and perhaps awkwardly a bit inspired his troops I think he was trying to channel this We need not always be reserved and restrained, letting our foes and competitors know that we are ready and on some level itching for fight is a good way to nurture deterrence Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the collective assessment that Mini is done might be premature Looks like he’s got some support https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-mccaul-air-force-generals-prediction-2025-war-china-hope-wrong-think-right.amp And on this podcast he got some support https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fault-lines/id1481982630?i=1000597292329 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It’s to some extent more money but I think it’s really for these guys still being part of the DC scene in some way, if you get another job in the nat sec ir blob the road goes forever and the party never ends Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My spidey sense says they were still concerned about their career vs what they believed, it was just about their next career. Be it college president, think tank wonk, consultant, whatever... those who publicly profess contra-prevailing conventional wisdom / groupthink ideas probably have limited post mil career opportunities. There is something to having a unified team and then there's a pack of lemmings blindly following the lemming in front of them. No perfect objective measure like porn vs art but you know it when you see it. I think that compliments your above point on leaders willing to challenge the status quo. Copy book recommendation.

I hear and think you are mostly right but f*** it, who cares, when we are given the chance to speak the truth from a place and platform that the troops, the warfighters, the mission hackers can hear it and not get watered down by the Bobs, yes men and future apparatchiks of the nat sec blob, we should take it. Maybe this was planned, maybe they told him to be the guy to say what needed to be said publicly then rebuked but he has now said the emperor has no clothes and it is in the public space and probably now acceptable for other leaders to say well I would said it differently but.. it's true so we're gonna focus on real military shit because WW3 is upcoming...

I could go round and round arguing with you on your opinions on immigration (legal and illegal) and we would not change each other's minds, also I consider you a good faith arguer and non-shitposter so if that's your opinion fair enough. I would disagree (well just a little round and round) that immigration is a massive net positive for the USA; controlled, legal, meritocratic, diverse immigration at a rate that can be assimilated is a net positive, how much of a positive I think is overstated IMHO.

So you're okay with the SW border situation? You believe the administration is correctly interpreting and enforcing the laws of the USA regarding immigration and employment enforcement?