HuggyU2

Bite your tongue. The green bag will be around when intergalactic travel is commonplace.

I seem to recall the Navy's flight boots had steel toes... but the AF didn't allow steel toes in theirs. Am I remembering that right?

I hate Guard and Reserve guys. All of them. Even my friends. I hate them. Day 1 of UPT, we were in the Laughlin auditorium, sitting there to get our foot prints taken in our Blues, and each of us asking the other what we wanted to fly. "I want to fly the F-15"... I want to fly the KC-10"... ... ... ... The one Reservist in our class: "I'm going to fly the F-4". Us: "What do you mean you're 'going to fly the F-4' "? Him: "I'm a Reservist". Us: "So? What does that mean?" (note: this was before the internet, where you could find out all about the Reserves without lifting a finger) Him: My unit is at Wright-Patt. We have F-4's there, and that's what I'll fly." Us: "Wait... what?... Hey!! You KNOW what you're going to fly already?? Maj XX, can I transfer to this Reserve thing, sir??!!!!" You guys all suck... and we hate you.

https://ktxs.com/news/local/wanted-dyess-airman-captured

Years ago, David Clark changed the design of the torso harness (i.e. parachute harness), to make it a touch lighter. The weight was irrelevant, but they removed all of the padding that made sitting in the suit so comfortable. The first time I wore my "new" harness was opening night of OIF on an 11+ hour sortie. I was more uncomfortable after 3-4 hours in the new harness than I would have been after 12 in the old one. Another dumb idea made without consulting the end user.

What’s the reason for starting this thread? I get the impression there is something “personal” about your dislike of SK.

This says it all...

What does the brain trust know about excellent black flight boots? USAF Approved preferably but not required.

They said the space suits were redesigned to look fashionable, but I am not a fan. Plus... everyone knows Star Wars predicted the return of the orange flightsuit / spacesuit.

If you were to make masks "mandatory" for airline travel, what would your criteria be? - Medical research shows that if they are not tight fitting, the efficacy diminishes. How do you measure/determine if they fit well enough? - Can people hang their nose over the mask? - I'm on a 17 hour flight to Singapore: do I get breaks when I can remove it? How long? Do I only do it when in the lavatory? - We give accommodations to people that need support animals because of various emotional issues such as PTSD. What about those that have claustrophobia and find a mask to simply be impossible to don? What accommodations will we make for them? - What materials are acceptable? One research study I read stated that 600 count cotton along with two sheets of chiffon (made from polyester or spandex) was one of the most effective combinations. However, I've seen some pretty shaky homemade masks that don't appear go do much of anything. Who decides what is allowed and what isn't? Is the person deciding trained to know the difference?

An excellent resource for any military pilot, and it's been well known (and used) for decades. And it's free. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/media/00-80t-80.pdf

What percentage of them are going to flying jobs that they want to do?

Prozac, Wearing pants is like masks? I guess we are not going to agree on this. Also keep in mind that any federal oversight will have to be enforced by... you guessed it... the Flight Attendants. Like they don't have enough crap to deal with.

Bobsan, I saw that plane on Barnstormers and it looks like a really nice plane for a screamin' deal. Congratulations on joining the "owners ranks". Nice picture over the AF Museum. 👍

How do you (and would you?) mandate mask usage on a 5 hours transcon? How about a 15 hour flight to Sydney? Can you remove the mask for 15 minutes so you can eat? What about the beverage service? Can people hang their nose over the mask? What kind of material does the mask have to be, or what thickness? I skeptical that there is a common sense way to implement this, and I admit am against the idea of yet another Federal rule imposed on the masses... one that I believe is as ineffective as the TSA.

Should definitely look at putting a stop to night landings on training sorties. Too much risk.

Well stated.

Uh huh.

Hindsight, I completely get your point. But if I were to get the offer, I'd jump in a Snowbirds jet tomorrow without a thought. Same with the T-38. You can always "buy" more capable technology... but at some point it becomes diminishing returns. Accelerating through 400' AGL at 60+ degrees nose low is a tough parameter for any seat. And there sure are a lot of high performance aerobatic aircraft that don't have the luxury of an ejection seat.

PreContact, I'd like to see a post in YOUR words, not an eight-year old article posted without comment. Can you summarize? I am very aware of the RCAF and the Department of National Defence's discussions about the future of the team for the past decade How does THIS mishap relate to YOUR position that they should be grounded? Nickel on the grass for Jenn.

Clayton, were you at Hangar 24 AirFest in 2018? Jenn was the PAO for the CF-18 team back then. She was a hoot... just a lot of fun and energy. OK!. Let's just jump on the knee-jerk train and take action before any causal information is known. Certainly not an example of "thoughtful response".

A local guy built an RV-14 and took me with him on an out-and-back to Chester Field (O05) in the Sierra. Really nice airplane. I cannot imagine Vans will be selling a lot of RV-7 kits with this out. The extra space is a big plus. I just saw the first one listed on Barnstormers: the owner wants $199,000. Ouch.

IMA

It only took 20 years to make it happen. But it happened... finally. Another success to chalk up for the current leadership at Beale. Well done. It's a great time to be in the 9th.

In the T-38? Pretty sure you're wrong. And no, we haven't been "lucky". Same way you haven't been "lucky" you haven't killed yourself in whatever you fly. You've worked hard at being good at it. Irrespective, we have had a shitload more Class A's on single-ship no flap, single-engine, and normal touch and goes than we have EVER had on T-38 wing landings. How about the dreaded T-38 single-engine go-around. About as benign as it gets, right? And not needed for an F-16 or F-35, right? For you T-38 IP's out there, do you know why they brief it now the way that they do? It's because in '87 or '88, we crashed a T-38 doing a SE Go at DLF. It's not in Road to Wings because... miraculously... the jet hit the dirt, went through the VASI's, and came to rest in the caliche and weeds to the left of 13L... and everyone walked away. The jet flew a few days later. So stop SE Go's too? After all, what are the odds it will happen for real... and if it does, that it will kill you?? Maybe the problem is touch and go's, and everything should be a full stop like in the GA world. That'll fix it. I'm sure it does!!! As do other training events. I think a lot of you have higher expectations of UPT grads than maybe you should. And dumbing down the T-38 syllabus won't make it any better. What else should go away? 3G/90 degree wing work? Close trail at 4G and 120 degrees? Do you do those items in the CAF? How much four-ship wing work and close formation do y'all do in a $339M F-22? You want to know the closest times I've come to a midair? Twice as #3 in an echelon turn where the other IP insisted that we fly 2G/60 deg... f'in dumb. I could have put the palm of my hand on the belly of #2 one of those times. Thankfully 4 wasn't that close when I split S'd out of formation. The other memorable instance... also TWICE... was sandbagging on IFF sorties with all IP's (no students). And both times it was on BDA checks. YGBSM! When was the last time a BDA check found something really important? So get rid of that too? Typing this out with a bottle of tequila has brought back some great memories. And it's fun to watch you fighter/attack folks argue about the merits of BFM too. Good night!