HuggyU2

Siegzy, welcome to Beale. Lots of GA flyers there Be sure to check out the High Sierra flyin which is held annually.

I had forgotten about Rans! I flew an S-12 a few times years ago, and really enjoyed it. It even had a BRS chute on it. I'm glad to see they are still innovating, and will definitely look at their product line as an option for me.

T-Pain, I'm not arguing with you one bit. Please understand I'm not pontificating and stating you must have the job satisfaction I did. My career was exceptional... and unique.. and I spent a lot of mental time planning through various things to make it go my way. No doubt I was fortunate in things I couldn't control. Even my U-2 cohorts will tell you I had a charmed career. Had things gone for me like they went for some other people on here, I'm sure I would have separated or retired before my 28 years. I remember sitting in front of the Alconbury MPF (CBPO for you old guys) when my UPT commitment ended and the bonus was offered. "Get out or stay in?" I sat in my car with the engine running for about 30 minutes questioning the decision. In the end, I went in and signed up for 6 more years (or whatever it was). Glad I did. Here's the bottom line. My overly-long post yesterday was simply aimed at Joe's statement: "it's pretty f*cked up to turn down a massive improvement in income and quality of life to drag your family from base to base, suffering through deployments and taking a massive paycut just because you want to wear a bag and go fast." That rubs me the wrong way. Big time. I've heard this sentiment from others, and I've heard it often: that my selfishness and unwillingness to leave the military has caused my family pain and suffering, and a reduction in their quality of life. I'd be a rich airline Captain, had I separated at the 6 year point, right? And my lack of seeing the big picture financially has prevented my family from being wealthier. And my time away from home negatively affected my kids... as opposed to the 18 months I was Executive Director and when I was home, I was in my office working from 1900-2300 most nights, and unable to do stuff on the weekends. There's more to QOL than meets the eye. I really don't think that's what Joe's message really was intended to be... but that's what I hear when I read people that post "you're crazy and doing a disservice to your family if you stay in 1 day past your commitment". I've had U-2 guys seek my advice, and in some cases I've told them they should leave the AF at the end of their current commitment. If I was in their shoes, I'd certainly do it. And had I gotten the fighter I wanted out of UPT, I doubt I would have lasted beyond my 6 year commitment. It turns out the U-2 Program was the perfect fit for me. I only left because they threw me out. I do not begrudge anyone that leaves when they are done. They gave 6, 8, 10 years of their life to the country, and deserve every ounce of my respect. But don't tell me I'm fucked up because I decided to stay for 28.

I see this topic come up as "thread creep" in other threads, and figured I'd start a thread. A nice photo of an RV was recently posted. I figure there is a good brain-trust around here with the RV-line of aircraft, and others. I met a Captain building an RV-14. Sounds like the ultimate RV to me. Really interested in learning more. Do any of you have experience with one yet? https://www.vansaircraft.com/public/rv14.htm

You know, Joe, the "military life" isn't for everyone. You're certainly not the only one that has made a similar statement/post, and it is certainly not my goal to poke you in the eye. I simply have a different outlook I'd like to share. While you consider my decision to stay in "fucked up", I certainly didn't, and I "wore the bag" for 28 years. It's a "service to the country". There's sacrifice involved. And my family got to be a part of that experience. No, my kids didn't get much of a vote. The career decision was mine to make. You're right: I could have improved my "income" had I separated at the end of my 6-year UPT commitment, but more money wasn't my goal. As for "improved quality of life"... that's a personal matter. Serving as a USAF pilot was my dream... and I was living my dream. The satisfaction I had in doing my service was my "good QOL". And my kids relish their time living on base. They were very happy times. I signed up to serve. And when I got married, she agreed to it too. Oh yeah... she was a military brat who never stayed anywhere more than 3 years while growing up. I guess the lifestyle rubbed off on my oldest kid, who is now a Lieutenant, and commissioned despite outsiders saying it was a stupid decision, based on civilian career potential due to graduating from a prestigious private university. Said Lt is apparently fucked up like dad. As for me, I could have been an civilian engineer like my dad, who had a PhD. I went to 4 different high schools in 4 years. Is that fucked up QOL in your book, and is my dad to blame? I meet people now that say "my oldest is in 7th grade, so we need to stay h ere until he graduates". Really? Well, ok. If that's what they need, then so be it. To me, it seems odd when they only reason is that "they are established in football" or "with their friends". But I respect it. They know their family's needs better than anyone (hopefully). Having spent 18 months as the Executive Director of a very interesting civilian group after I retired, I can tell you the experience was worse than being on active duty in many respects. The AF isn't the only organization doing things terribly wrong and inefficient. If you want the money, and hate the QOL, then don't join the military. And if you make that realization while you're in, get out at your earliest opportunity. Many of my friends did just that. But in my case... as bad as things had become in the AF by the time I left in 2014... I still looked forward to going to work every day.

136?? Apparently, you don't fly the 737-900ER.

Quite possibly true. But now, those "participants" will not have access to a significant WMD resource. So, to answer the question you posed to me: yes.

I believe that the use of WMD crosses a significant and serious line. While I agree that we jump into too many fights, this is one I believe we should stand up for, and I am willing, as an American citizen, to accept the consequences. Additionally, it has the tertiary advantage of putting notice to the rest of the world that, despite the Obama administration's hollow threats of a red line, the current administration isn't going to be bullied by the Russians or anyone else. The more the Russians scream and shout, the more satisfied I am. Hell, if they wanted to influence the election, I'm sure they would have supported Hillary, and kept the status quo of American inaction towards Russia's aggressiveness. BTW... Trump should personally call Assad and let him know a bomb is going to be dropped on one of his palaces on Monday, and that he might want to find a hotel for a few evenings. Then on Monday, do what he told him he'd do.

A few years ago, a Raptor landed gear up when the pilot neglected to lower the gear. Do do any of you know if that pilot flew again in the USAF?

Nothing specified. What are you thinking?

Bolter, Any idea how far down the runway did the jet stop?

This event continues to grow, and is a two-day event this year. 19-20 May, in Redlands, CA... about 1 hour west of Palm Springs. This not your father's airshow: it's a beer festival, concert, with an airshow component. And there is more craft beer at AirFest than at any airshow in the US. The Canadians are bringing the CF-18 Demo Team for one of their very few US performances, including a twilight performance on Saturday evening. F-16 Demo will be there too. The civilian performers are stellar. FYI: the Sunday show is going to be different. The planes will fly, but about half of the show will not be announced. Instead, the bands will play while the aircraft fly overhead. Should be a laid back vibe, with a a lot of "beermosas" flowing... and should make for a relaxed Sunday. Click on the Redlands date for the dropdown menu: https://www.hangar24airfest.com If interested in bringing a static display, drop me a note, and I'll pass your info on. https://hangar24brewing.com

https://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/22/eating-vegan-diet-promotes-white-masculinity-sociologist-argues.html Really?

Probably because there's a picture of Toro hanging in the ROTC Detachment, with a caption that says: "Hey Cadet, you want to send in a request to fly a fighter?? Go ahead... make my day."

I'm doing about 60 in a 45 on Beale, and go beak-to-beak with a mil cop. No indication on my radar detector, however. I see the brake lights, and he reverses. I immediately pull over. He comes to the window: "Sir, I had you doing 61 in a 45" (I guess he had a good eyeball... pretty accurate). Me: "I'd like to see your radar screen, because my radar detector never went off." Him: "Sir, radar detectors are not allowed on Beale" Me: "While that may be true, I'd like you to explain to my commander... and yours... how you got me doing 61 mph, using an X-band radar that didn't activate my radar detector." Him (flustered and agitated): "Have a nice day, sir", and walks off.

Don't these upstanding citizens go on to become pro ball players in the NBA? Well, I guess the culture starts somewhere. NFL, NBA... NCAA. Couldn't give two shits about college... or pro... sports.

The Hangar 24 AirFest in Redlands, CA (KREI) is 70 days away, and I'd like to get a T-6 static display, as well as flyovers of any military aircraft. You can stage out of SBD (civ field with military fuel; 4nm away), or March ARB (13 nm away). Let me know if interested. https://www.hangar24airfest.com/beerfestival/ https://www.hangar24airfest.com/performers/ https://www.hangar24airfest.com/aviators/

There’s a sucker born every minute.

WTF, indeed... While this message came from the Navy, I wouldn't put it past the AF to do it. BTW, now that it is 2018, and teletypes are no longer in fashion, can we develop a more readable message format... and avoid typing in all CAPS? WTF??? I hope someone sends a return message to COMNAVSAFECENSLIPSLOPFLIPFLOPNICKNACKPADDYWHACKGIVEADOGABONE asking them to clarify. R 011925Z MAR 18 FM COMNAVSAFECEN NORFOLK VA TO AIG 6942 MSGID/GENADMIN/COMNAVSAFECEN/30/MAR// SUBJ/ADVANCED CHANGE NOTICE TWO (ACN-2) TO OPNAVINST 5100.19E// REF/A/DESCOC/CNO/30MAY2007// GENTEXT/REMARKS/1. REFERENCE A DOES NOT INCLUDE A PROGRAM GUIDANCE CHAPTER FOR FALL PROTECTION, THIS ACN ADDS CHAPTER B13, THE FALL PROTECTION CHAPTER THAT WILL BE PROMULGATED IN REVISION FOXTROT OF REFERENCE A. INCLUDE A COPY OF THIS MESSAGE WITH REFERENCE A. 2. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS AND POLICY CHANGES TO REFERENCE A APPLY. 3. CHAPTER B13, INCLUDING 2 ASSOCIATED APPENDIXES, ARE QUOTED BELOW. B1301. DISCUSSION A.THIS CHAPTER PROVIDES REQUIREMENTS TO ESTABLISH AND MANAGE A COMPREHENSIVE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR AFLOAT NAVY ACTIVITIES, WHICH HAVE PERSONNEL EXPOSED TO FALLS FROM HEIGHTS. THE GOAL OF THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM IS TO PREVENT INJURIES AND FATALITIES WHEN PERSONNEL WORKING AT HEIGHTS ARE EXPOSED TO FALL HAZARDS ON NAVY VESSELS. A MANAGED FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM MUST BE IN WRITING AND APPROVED BY THE TYPE COMMANDERS, IMMEDIATE SUPERIORS IN COMMAND (ISICS), OR UNIT LEVEL, DEPENDING ON THE SCOPE, RESOURCES AND EXPERTISE REQUIRED AS DETERMINED BY THE TYPE COMMANDERS. PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION WILL REQUIRE SUPPORTING RESOURCES FROM SPONSORS, NAVAL SAFETY CENTER, AND FLEET COMMANDERS TO INCLUDE TRAINING. B.THERE IS NO SAFE DISTANCE FROM AN UNPROTECTED SIDE OR EDGE OF A DECK OR PLATFORM. THERE IS NO MINIMUM TIME DURATION THAT ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS (E.G., IF A 2-MINUTE JOB REQUIRES 15 MINUTES TO ESTABLISH FALL PROTECTION). FALL-RELATED MISHAPS ARE GENERALLY COMPLEX EVENTS FREQUENTLY INVOLVING MANY FACTORS. CONSEQUENTLY, THE REQUIREMENTS FOR RISK MANAGEMENT FOR FALL PROTECTION MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO: (1) PLANNING, REVIEWS, AND EXECUTION OF WORK OPERATIONS AND PROCEDURES; (2) JOB HAZARD ANALYSES; (3) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES; (4) EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND MAINTENANCE; AND (5) TRAINING. C. COMMANDS AT ALL LEVELS HAVE A DUTY TO ANTICIPATE THE NEED FOR PERSONNEL TO WORK AT HEIGHTS AND PLAN WORK ACCORDINGLY. THIS MEANS EFFECTIVE MISHAP PREVENTION AND RESCUE PROCEDURES MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO ALL JOB PLANNING PROCESS. ALL COMMANDS MUST IDENTIFY FALL HAZARDS BY PERFORMING A FALL HAZARD SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT ON EACH WORK PROCESS AND UTILIZE RISK MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES TO IDENTIFY HAZARDS, DETERMINE THE LEVEL OF RISK THEY PRESENT TO PERSONNEL OR EQUIPMENT, AND TO DEVELOP CONTROLS TO MINIMIZE THOSE RISKS. A THOROUGH RISK MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT MUST INCLUDE AN EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL FALL HAZARDS PER REFERENCE (A). IMPLEMENTING ACTIVITIES MAY USE REFERENCE (B) AS A SUPPLEMENT TO ITS COMPREHENSIVE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM. B1302.RESPONSIBILITIES A.IMPLEMENTING ACTIVITIES MUST DELINEATE DUTIES AND ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A MANAGED FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM. THE ACTIVITIES MUST ENSURE THAT SHIP'S COMPANY PERSONNEL, IN COMPANY WITH TYCOM AND OTHER RESOURCES, HAVE THE NECESSARY SKILLS, KNOWLEDGE, TRAINING, AND EXPERTISE TO MANAGE, ADMINISTER, IMPLEMENT AND MONITOR THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM. DEPENDING UPON THE ACTIVITY SIZE AND MISSION, THE PERSONNEL WHO MANAGE, ADMINISTER, IMPLEMENT AND MONITOR THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM MAY EITHER BE ASSIGNED FULL-TIME, OR PART- TIME (I.E., COLLATERAL DUTY). TYCOMS MAY ALSO ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO MANAGE AND IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM ACROSS MULTIPLE UNITS OR ISICS. PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM MUST HAVE THE FOLLOWING QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: (1) THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM MANAGER (FPPM): A PERSON DESIGNATED IN WRITING BY THE COMMAND WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM. THE FPPM MUST ENSURE THAT SHIPBOARD PERSONNEL EXPOSED TO FALL HAZARDS, AND OTHER PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN MANAGING THE PROGRAM, RECEIVE ADEQUATE TRAINING AS OUTLINED IN THIS CHAPTER. NOTE: THE FFPM POSITION NEED NOT BE AN EXCLUSIVE TITLE DESIGNATION. WITH ADEQUATE EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND EXPERIENCE, THE SAME PERSON MAY ALSO FUNCTION AS A COMPETENT PERSON. (2) COMPETENT PERSON FOR FALL PROTECTION: A PERSON, WHO THROUGH TRAINING KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERTISE, IS CAPABLE OF IDENTIFYING HAZARDOUS OR DANGEROUS CONDITIONS IN PERSONAL FALL ARREST SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS, AND IN USING THE RIGHT EQUIPMENT, AND WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO TAKE PROMPT CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO ELIMINATE OR CONTROL THE HAZARDS OF FALLING. THIS PERSON MUST BE DESIGNATED IN WRITING BY THE COMMAND TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMMEDIATE SUPERVISION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MONITORING OF THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM. THE COMPETENT PERSON WILL IDENTIFY, EVALUATE, AND ADDRESS EXISTING AND POTENTIAL FALL HAZARDS; AND ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE IN THE APPLICATION AND USE OF PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION AND RESCUE SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT. THE COMPETENT PERSON IS THE FRONTLINE WHEN IT COMES TO DELIVERING THE TRAINING AND REFRESHER TRAINING, AND MONITORING HOW END-USERS ARE USING FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT. (3) QUALIFIED PERSON FOR FALL PROTECTION: A PERSON WITH A RECOGNIZED ENGINEERING DEGREE OR PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATE AND WITH EXTENSIVE KNOWLEDGE, TRAINING, AND EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF FALL PROTECTION WHO IS CAPABLE OF DESIGNING, ANALYZING, EVALUATING, AND SPECIFYING FALL PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND RESCUE SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT. THIS PERSON MAY SERVE AS THE EXPERT FOR MULTIPLE UNITS OR TYPES OF UNITS AS DETERMINED BY THE TYPE COMMANDER. (4) END-USER OF FALL PROTECTION (AUTHORIZED PERSON): A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN TRAINED IN THE USE OF ASSIGNED FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IN A TYPICAL FALL HAZARD SITUATION, INCLUDING HANDS-ON TRAINING AND PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION AND USING PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING FALL ARREST, FALL RESTRAINT, OR FALL POSITIONING) WHILE PERFORMING WORK ASSIGNMENTS AT HEIGHTS. A COMPETENT PERSON AT THE UNIT, LEVEL WHO HAS THE KNOWLEDGE, EXPERTISE, AND EDUCATION TO DELIVER THE TRAINING MUST TRAIN END- USERS. B.THE COMMANDER OR COMMANDING OFFICER OF EMBARKED PERSONNEL FOR INSPECTIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, ASSESSMENTS, AND VISITS (ICAV) MUST: (1) ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT A FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM, WHICH INCLUDES (A) ASSIGNING RESPONSIBILITIES. (B) SURVEYING AND ASSESSING FALL HAZARDS. (C) PROVIDING PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SITE SPECIFIC FALL PROTECTION AND PREVENTION PLAN. THE ICAV COMPETENT PERSON (CP) CAN ADOPT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SHIPS SITE SPECIFIC FP PLAN IF THE AREA WHERE THEIR PERSONNEL ARE WORKING AT HEIGHTS HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THE SHIPS SPECIFIC FP PLAN. NOTE: THE SITE SPECIFIC FP PLAN SHOULD BE DEVELOPED BY THE COMPETENT PERSON ASSOCIATED WITH WHOEVER IS MAKING A VISIT TO THE SHIP. THE ICAV CP CAN UTILIZE THE SHIPS SITE SPECIFIC FP IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE WORKING AT HEIGHTS IN AN AREA THAT IS ALREADY COVERED UNDER THAT PLAN (I.E. GOING ALOFT ON THE MAST). HOWEVER, IF THE ENTITY MAKING THE VISIT TO THE SHIP IS WORKING AT HEIGHTS IN AN AREA THAT HAS NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THE SHIPS SPECIFIC FP PLAN THEY ARE OBLIGATED TO EVALUATE THE AREA TO BE WORKED AND DEVELOP THAT PLAN. (D) TRAINING OF PERSONNEL. (E) INSPECTING EQUIPMENT. (F) AUDITING AND EVALUATION. (G) PROPER INSTALLATION AND USE OF FALL PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT. (H) AVAILABILITY OF RESCUE EQUIPMENT WITH ACCOMPANYING RESCUE PROCEDURES. (2) DESIGNATE IN WRITING A FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM MANAGER (FPPM), E-7 OR ABOVE, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM. C.THE COMMANDING OFFICER OF A NAVAL VESSEL MUST: (1) ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT A FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM, WHICH INCLUDES (A) ASSIGNING RESPONSIBILITIES. (B) SURVEYING AND ASSESSING FALL HAZARDS. (C) PROVIDING PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES. (D) TRAINING (E) INSPECTING EQUIPMENT. (F) AUDITING AND EVALUATION. (G) PROPER INSTALLATION AND USE OF FALL PROTECTION SYSTEMS. (H) AVAILABILITY OF RESCUE EQUIPMENT WITH ACCOMPANYING RESCUE PROCEDURES. (2) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SHIPYARD PERSONNEL DURING AN AVAILABILITY, PROVIDE FALL PROTECTION TO EMBARKED NAVY CIVILIANS AND MILITARY PERSONNEL EXPOSED TO FALL HAZARDS ON ANY ELEVATED WALKING WORKING SURFACE WITH UNPROTECTED SIDES, EDGES, OR FLOOR OPENINGS, FROM WHICH THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF FALLING 5 FEET OR MORE TO A LOWER LEVEL; OR, WHERE THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF A FALL FROM ANY HEIGHT ONTO DANGEROUS EQUIPMENT, INTO A HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENT, OR ONTO AN IMPALEMENT HAZARD. ENSURE CONTRACTORS DO NOT USE GOVERNMENT-OWNED FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT UNLESS IT IS STATED IN THE CONTRACT AND ENSURE THAT NAVY CIVILIAN AND MILITARY PERSONNEL WILL NOT USE CONTRACTOR-OWNED FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT. (3) DESIGNATE IN WRITING A FPPM, E-7 OR ABOVE, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM. (4) WAIVE, IN WRITING, FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, IF IN HIS OR HER ASSESSMENT, THE REQUIRED USE OF FALL ARREST EQUIPMENT PLACES THE END-USER IN A POTENTIALLY UNSAFE SITUATION. THIS WAIVER WILL ONLY BE GRANTED UNDER THE STRICTEST OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND AFTER CONDUCTING AND DOCUMENTING A THOROUGH RISK ASSESSMENT UTILIZING RISK MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES OF THE WORK OPERATION. D.THE FPPM MUST: (1) DEVELOP, IMPLEMENT, AND MANAGE THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM PER REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CHAPTER. (2) MAINTAIN A FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM INSTRUCTION THAT ADDRESSES ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE BEYOND THE FALL PROTECTION POLICY DETAILED IN THIS INSTRUCTION, AND INCLUDE PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT ISSUE POINTS AND OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS. (3) ENSURE A SITE-SPECIFIC SHIPBOARD RESCUE PLAN, AS AN APPENDIX TO THE INSTRUCTION, IS IN PLACE FOR ANY LOCATIONS THAT MAY REQUIRE RESCUE [SEE PARAGRAPH B1305]. THE FALL PROTECTION INSTRUCTION MUST ADDRESS WORKING OVER THE SIDE, WORKING ALOFT, AND INTERIOR AND DECK AREAS OF A SHIP (E.G., ENCLOSED MASTS, HANGER BAYS, WELL DECKS, VEHICLE STORAGE DECKS, RAMPS, VERTICAL TRUNKS, ELEVATOR TRUNKS, DUMBWAITER TRUNKS, PACKAGE CONVEYOR TRUNKS, VOID SPACES, AND BALLAST TANKS) WITH UNPROTECTED SIDES, EDGES, AND OPENINGS FROM WHICH THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF (A) FALL FROM 5 FEET OR MORE TO A LOWER LEVEL, OR (B) FALL FROM ANY HEIGHT ONTO DANGEROUS EQUIPMENT, INTO A HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENT, OR ONTO AN IMPALEMENT HAZARD. (4) ENSURE FPPM TRAINING IS COMPLETED PER PARAGRAPH B1307. (5) ENSURE THAT THE SAFETY OFFICER, COMPETENT PERSON, FALL PROTECTION SAFETY OBSERVERS, SUPERVISORS OF END-USERS, AND END- USERS OF FALL PROTECTION RECEIVE TRAINING PER PARAGRAPH B1307. (6) USE RISK MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES TO ASSESS FALL HAZARDS AND TAKE PROMPT CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO ELIMINATE OR CONTROL THE HAZARDS. (7) ENSURE THAT ALL PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IMPACTED BY A FALL IS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM SERVICE AND HELD FOR MISHAP OR NEAR MISHAP INVESTIGATION PER REFERENCE (C). PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT REFERS TO FALL ARREST RESTRAINT AND POSITIONING EQUIPMENT. (8) ENSURE THAT ONLY NAVSEA-AUTHORIZED PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IS ONBOARD, AND THAT IT IS INSPECTED, STOWED, MAINTAINED, AND ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH B1304. (9) CONDUCT A SELF-ASSESSMENT EVALUATION OF THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM AT LEAST ANNUALLY. SECTION A, CHAPTER 3 CONTAINS INFORMATION ON CONDUCTING SELF-ASSESSMENT EVALUATIONS. (10) ENSURE THAT WHEN AN END-USER OF FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IS WORKING OVER THE SIDE OR WORKING ALOFT THAT A FALL PROTECTION SAFETY OBSERVER IS ASSIGNED TO OVERSEE THE EVOLUTION. (11) ENSURE THAT ALL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT LOGS, WORKING ALOFT AND OVER THE SIDE CHITS, AUDITS, ETC. ARE MAINTAINED FOR 5 YEARS AND AUDITED ANNUALLY PER REFERENCE (B). (12) ENSURE THAT ONLY APPROVED ANCHOR POINTS ARE USED WHEN TIED OFF. FOR SHIPS WITHOUT APPROVED ANCHOR POINTS, A COMPETENT PERSON MUST DESIGNATE TIE-OFF POINTS. E.DIVISION OFFICERS MUST ENSURE THAT PERSONNEL EXPOSED TO FALL HAZARDS ARE QUALIFIED IN THE USE OF AND PROVIDED WITH PROPER PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AS SPECIFIED BY THE COMPETENT PERSON. F.THE SAFETY OFFICER MUST: (1) COMPLETE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED BY PARAGRAPH B1307. (2) ENSURE THAT ALL INJURIES FROM FALLS AND NEAR MISSES ARE REPORTED PER REFERENCE (C). (3) ASSIST THE FPPM IN IDENTIFYING FALL HAZARDS AND TAKING PROMPT CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO ELIMINATE OR CONTROL THE HAZARDS. (4) ENSURE THAT THE FPPM CONDUCTS A SELF-ASSESSMENT OF THE FALL PROTECTION PROGRAM AT LEAST ANNUALLY. SECTION A, CHAPTER 3 CONTAINS INFORMATION ON CONDUCTING SELF-ASSESSMENT EVALUATIONS. G.FALL PROTECTION SAFETY OBSERVERS MUST: (1) COMPLETE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, AS REQUIRED BY PARAGRAPH B1307. (2) HAVE NO OTHER DUTIES ASSIGNED IN THE WORK OPERATION. (3) KEEP UNNECESSARY PERSONNEL FROM DECKS ABOVE THE WORK AREA, OVER THE SIDE, OR BENEATH THE WORK AREA BEING DONE AFLOAT. (4) KEEP IN VISUAL CONTACT WITH ALL PERSONNEL WORKING ALOFT, OR OVER THE SIDE, IN THE RESPECTIVE AREA OR ZONE ASSIGNED. (5) ENSURE THAT ANY FALL INJURY AND ANY NEAR MISS IS REPORTED TO BOTH THE FPPM AND THE SAFETY OFFICER. (6) ENSURE THAT THE OFFICER OF THE DECK IS IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED IN THE EVENT OF ANY FALL INJURY OR NEAR MISS. (7) WEAR THE SAME PERSONAL FALL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT AS THE PERSONNEL WORKING ALOFT OR OVER THE SIDE, INCLUDING A HARD HAT. H.SUPERVISORS OF END-USERS MUST: (1) ENSURE THAT END-USERS ARE PERMITTED TO ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE IN FALL PROTECTION TRAINING, AS REQUIRED. (2) COMPLETE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS, AS REQUIRED BY PARAGRAPH B1307. I.END-USERS OF FALL PROTECTION MUST: (1) COMPLETE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS BEFORE USING THE EQUIPMENT, AS REQUIRED BY PARAGRAPH B1307. (2) USE ONLY NAVSEA-AUTHORIZED PERSONAL FALL ARREST OR FALL RESTRAINT, FALL POSITIONING EQUIPMENT OR SYSTEMS WHEN EXPOSED TO FALL HAZARDS IN PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES. (3) ENSURE THAT ALL INJURIES FROM FALLS AND NEAR MISSES ARE REPORTED TO BOTH THE FPPM AND THE SAFETY OFFICER.

Hire civilians for queep: I think we have all seen a plethora of examples where a GS is hired... is absolutely incompetent at the job... and can't be gotten rid of. No, simply get rid of the majority of the queep.

Nothing... except for really good Airshows, with a Monday return.

For those of you currently at an AETC pilot training base, how many hours are on those AETC T-38C's?

What is "ALP", please?

I hear there is a lot of open airspace, and a big runway near Lubbock, Texas...

Take a prozac, Prozac.