Jump to content

FourFans

Supreme User
  • Posts

    1,479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Everything posted by FourFans

  1. Bugger, cock, bollucks, bellend, plonker NATO network ops check good.
  2. Someone make Ram a General. He's ready.
  3. Documentary Google for the win. The Boeing Bird of Prey was a black project aircraft, intended to demonstrate stealth technology. It was developed by McDonnell Douglas and Boeing in the 1990s. The company provided $67 million of funding for the project; it was a low-cost program compared to many other programs of similar scale. It developed technology and materials which would later be used on Boeing's X-45 unmanned combat air vehicle. As an internal project, this aircraft was not given an X-plane designation. There are no public plans to make this a production aircraft. It is characterized as a technology demonstrator. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Bird_of_Prey
  4. Open source speculations are always fun. https://www.combataircraft.net/2017/06/23/how-did-a-30-year-old-su-22-defeat-a-modern-aim-9x/ Also a neat quick read about the red eagles from an embedded link on that page (where did Steve Davies go?): https://aviationweek.com/blog/we-didn-t-know-what-90-percent-switches-did
  5. Clearly you meant flight engineer.
  6. $2 for mis-use of the Walken Comma.
  7. Does this count? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/06/14/isis-drones-are-attacking-u-s-troops-and-disrupting-airstrikes-in-raqqa-officials-say/?utm_term=.5042b8070eee
  8. An RQ-4 has been dispatched to continue the search for survivors.
  9. Azimuth, thanks for being candid and honest. Rare to find these days when hearing about one's deeds and misdeeds. Regardless the story (there are always two sides), even if half of this tale is based on miscommunication and misunderstand, it still sounds like the USAF's "fact finding" investigative capabilities haven't improved much since Mollygate. A caution: Please be careful how much info you tell about these other people in a public internet forum. Right or wrong, it wouldn't be difficult for an average joe to figure out exactly who all of them are with what you've given...yourself included. (for example, no need to tell who's a swinger and who does camera porn...completely irrelevant to your story). I know it's your freedom of speech right to do so, but we also have a moral responsibility. Please don't disregard that. Tell the story, but protect the people. There are serious wack jobs on the internet these days looking for EXACTLY this kind of info.
  10. FML. Here's the link. Bender beat me to it. https://www.jqpublicblog.com/bonus-shenanigans-expose-air-forces-lack-progress-pilot-retention/
  11. True. No amount of worry can impact your future assignments, but it can easily distract and detract from current performance. There is only one plane phase one studs should think about: the T-6 Sent from my iPad using Baseops Network Forums
  12. One small step for man, on giant leap for Skynet. Sent from my iPad using Baseops Network Forums
  13. BQZip following in his mom's footsteps? https://www.whiteman.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1209105/stronger-for-it-offutt-airman-shares-her-journey-with-support-of-command-team/ This also belongs in the What's Wrong With the AF thread. We're in trouble.
  14. Hey look, the USAF brass is trying to hide their efforts to get rid of the A-10 again. https://www.dodbuzz.com/2017/06/09/air-force-mulls-cutting-three-a-10-squadrons/?ESRC=airforce-a_170614
  15. Well then. That pretty much caps off my horrific imagined sensations quota for the day.
  16. Sometimes the truth hurts.
  17. Awesome. The lead class of millennials will hit squadron command with the least ops experience, the most entitlement in the ranks, and a decade of leadership crisis paving the way for them. I know several great '06 folks. God be with you gents, I'll be looking for other employment. Sent from my iPad using Baseops Network Forums
  18. In no way will I ever depend on the USAF to provide me a way out. All that trust is gone. Correct about seniority though, which makes the whole argument difficult. My major difficulty is putting a whole lot of faith in a system when the gravy train is going full steam. It goes against a keep investment concept: "When others are greedy, exercise restraint. When others are restrained, be greedy." Sent from my iPad using Baseops Network Forums
  19. Definitely a good read, but the massive unspoken assumption in all that is continued economic prosperity. Jump ship at 17 years service chasing the promise of those extra millions, get hired, then get furloughed in 2 years in the face of an international crisis and what are you left with? Not sure if anyone here watches world events, but there are currently more than enough boiling cauldrons of stupidity across the globe waiting for the right impetus. No one here can tell the future, it simply doesn't seem wise to pass up a secure retirement check like that. Sent from my iPad using Baseops Network Forums
  20. https://futurism.com/lockheed-confirms-secretive-sr-72-hypersonic-plane-will-be-made/
  21. Indeed. If there's one fix that needs to happen tomorrow, it's keeping some pilots at FP, AC, wingman, or 2 FLUG because sometime...just sometimes...they will never be ready for more than those levels, and upgrading them because "it's their turn" is straight dangerous. Sent from my iPad using Baseops Network Forums
  22. They'd have to make entry into that track very competitive event with an interview required, mission flying eval, instructor capability eval, and a significant bro check. They'd have to make the selection process on par with that used for WIC applicants. Put one bad apple in that basket and you ruin the whole thing.
×
×
  • Create New...