FourFans

UA new hire jumpseated with a SWA crew, then filed an ASAP on that crew without telling them she was doing it.

Move to Florida. Seriously. I've seen multiple CZ's at my local indoor range. And that's saying I've also seen guns that simply shouldn't be at my local indoor range. For real, the guys here don't care WHAT you shoot so long as you're professional about HOW you shoot. I haven't hit the less-than-local outdoor range yet...but it's 1000+m long. I'd imagine @ClearedHot could definitely say more to shooting around here.

quoted for posterity. Immensely. Maybe not FIVE airplanes....but yes.

Gotta second this statement. It applies in almost every situation. When I retired from the AFRC, dudes were calling me the next few UTAs wondering where the hell I was. It's my goal in my current airline job to retire and have the bobs see the paperwork and say "who?"

FIFY

We are, but not how or where you might think. A very good friend of mine was heavy into the test world while on active duty. He's now retired and teaching AI how to conduct aerial combat. In his words, he's now doing far more to help the war fighter than he ever did before.

...and kicking doors...

26 hours at 120 decibels. That sounds absolutely horrible. The things dudes do to build time for the airlines.

I buy in bulk. It'll be the best end of the world currency.

I still haven't found a holster that I thoroughly like. Currently an alien gear. Thinking of trying the vnsh. Any recommendations?

Encountered him at Ramstein while he was on staff. Immediate impression was that he's a back-stabbing douchebag turd snorkler.

source?

These are students and this is learned behavior. Punish the students, yes. They are adults and deserve adult consequences. But nothing will change until the source of the behavior is addressed. Parents? Teachers? Media? Political leaders? I don't have that answer. My gut says that until we get conservative, intelligent, and sincere leaders in our country, it won't end. BTW: This is precisely why you use corporal punishment with your kids when they are young. If you don't issue physical pain as a consequence to your kids, someone else will have to later.

You apparently haven't been paying attention to what's actually happening in China. They have none of these advantages anymore. The one thing they had going for them was being the world's workshop...but that was economics planned by central committee. It came at many costs, one of them being technological innovation, and it's over. They are in the process of a demographic collapse thanks to 40 years of the one child policy. Even if they implemented a national breeding campaign, it would take 30-40 years for them to reap the economic benefits...and they haven't. The wage 'advantage' is no more. Mexican labor is cheaper by almost three times now. Mexican production quality is ALSO better. China may be able to make things, but they can't do it cheaply anymore (their middle class wages have skyrocketed) and they can't produce anything of high quality. What's more, they never had a national unity advantage. Everything their government does it to control their people, not dominate the world. We don't have to do anything to beat the Chinese economically besides wait. Militarily, all we'd have to do is close the Strait of Malacca and watch them starve in the dark, as they import so much food and energy. Oh-by-the-way guess what kind of weapons we just leant to the Australians in Darwin: Cruise missiles that can hit ships in the strait of malacca from over the horizon. As for national debt? You think we're hurting? Go google Chinese hyper financialization. The dollar may or may not remain the reserve currency, but the Yuan will NOT be taking it's place in our lifetime. Yes, the Chinese are great at long term intellectual planning, but NONE of their execution has followed any of that planning. They are screwed and all we have to do is not save them. Multiple historians, demographers, and geopolitical analysts have reached the above conclusions. Ray Dalio would be one exception, but reading his work it's clear his love of china is underpinned by strong emotional ties that clearly color his analysis. But even he doesn't paint a very rosy picture for them, specifically because of their economics and debt. Don't listen to the rhetoric, look at the details and facts.

I run the Glock 48 MOS. No red-dot yet. Handy and dependable. I debated between one of the 365 models (likely the macro) or the G48. In the end the budget won out as I got a nice military discount on the 48. $450 out the door while the 365 macro was over $800 at the time. Still want to get the sig, but I also have teenage kids to feed. Choices.

The Hurricane Hunters strike again.

Oh. I am a full believer that the US federal government should play absolutely no part in 'regulating' our weapons. The regulation isn't talking about making a registry or some such. Use the analogy of a pickup basketball team. You got the guy who practices alone all the time. Great at shooting freethrows on an empty court, but never practices or plays with a team. Another guy who never exercises and never shows up to practice but still declares he's on the team. Another who claims to be the team leader but has no clue how to run a play. That's not a team. That's an unregulated bunch of people who think they are something that they aren't. The intention behind the 2nd Amendment to not about making sure you have a gun. It's about making sure that you have a gun that you're able and willing to use in defense of your local community against tyranny (from abroad or within) while operating as part of a team, militia, or unit doing the same thing. The founders wanted to make sure that the country maintained it's ability to have grass roots self defense forces that were not mandated or controlled by the federal government. Remember that the revolutionaries were largely volunteers, and were largely disbanded after that war. There was originally to be no standing Army. The heart of the 2nd Amendment is two fold. A: Citizens - Keep your weapons and yourself ready so that if you're needed and you choose to volunteer, you can actually be useful. B: Government - Stay completely out of their way. Beyond that, the Amendments were never meant to stand individually. The biggest thing we as US citizens have forgotten is that citizenship is a responsibility, not a privilege.

People tend to forget the first portion of the second amendment and proceed directly to "shall not be infringed" For reference: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Nothing says well regulated like lack of accountability (which is effectively what an untraceable gun is). 'A militia, being necessary to the security of a free State' goes on to indicate that this right to bear arms is not for my own personal liberty, but me contributing to the liberty of my community. With regulated and controlled force if necessary. It implies that we have this right in order to serve and defend something bigger than ourselves, such as a community, city or state. I've yet to encounter law enforcement, military, or paramilitary organization that doesn't place a high emphasis on accountability and training. Karen with her .38 special that she carries loaded but never trains with does not fall into that category. Moreover, it's kinda difficult to rectify untraceable firearms with a well regulated civil defense. Not saying I'm totally against production of your own weapons. I think that's great! But it needs to be done responsibly.

because he's off...or will be thereso getting...Biff says:

@Biff_T: See that yellow circled part? Excess Russian women between 55 and 75. You were born for this.

Have you done any international assignments?

So, you've partied with some airline captains too, eh?

FIFY

...and that's why we need corporal punishment...

Oh, I know how I WANT us to respond. Respond with rational and reasoned thought and applying common sense while still holding out enemies accountable for their actions. But that's NOT how we've been acting. I'm curious about the most likely action our current leadership would actually take. It could get kinda interesting when you consider that those making recommendations to NCA are probably argyle wearing academics who have never had their lives placed in any form of peril. Put those people on the receiving end of a suspected nuclear launch and I'd be surprised if they make totally rational inputs. Beyond that, I highly doubt Joe Biden has the cognitive ability to make a good snap decision in such a case. Hence the question: What would we actually do?