busdriver

It's the result of some dip-shit over thinking. Seriously, some asshole is worried about the fact that since it points backwards it must mean that anyone behind you is constantly being flagged. Yes folks, there are people that stupid in the military and in a position to make policy. Shouldn't surprise me, ever seen the shooting "talent" of most base cops?

Beerman, you touched very nicely on my problem with Blackstang's posts. I know your community wants many more F-22s, as you should as an advocate for air dominance. That said, He hasn't really touched on the ultimate course of his argument. For the sake of argument and to play devil's advocate: what would be the cost to dump the AF version of the F-35 and leverage the R&D to develop a multi-role version of the F-22? Would it be a net gain having less 5th gen fighters overall but a more robust air dominance fleet, possibly backed with less expensive OA-X type aircraft for the permissive environment? I'm not an expert in this realm, but playing who can beat who is dumb argument.

You know it's just a thing, but you think someone who worked so hard to get that title would appreciate hard work and reciprocate. Couldn't you just call him General....

The two piece is flight approved by Brooks, AFSOC wears them. Those of us who love them have to wear body armor while flying, the armor keeps stove pipe issues at bay, and if you're really worried, just tuck it in. They probably would be less comfortable if you had to wear a g-suit. That said, my understanding is that big blue looks at the two piece as an "Army uniform" and thus hates it. I don't really care stateside, since I'm not wearing armor and whatnot. Actually, if they just flight approved the new Air Force ground combat uniform, I'd be happy and wear that while deployed and stick to the one piece while home station. I really think it has less to do with utility and more to do with being "distinctive" afterall the AF selected our new ridiculous ABU based on that criteria.

If by sweet you mean freakishly covered in external armor, then sure. I do like the comments the french have made about what they want: "If they could just give one more ton of weight, I'd probably ask for two."

Natchez Shooters Supply has Blazer 9mm/.45 for $14/$22 respectively.

Oh really?

(re poaching Medevac missions) I think I have the prize for that, I was flying chase and landed first ("hot" LZ) our medic got off, the grunts loaded patients into the opposite door, my gunner ran and grabbed the medic and we took off. All this while our Dustoff was waiting behind a ridge for us to clear out the LZ. When we told them we had all the patients and we could RTB, the only response on the radio was "Cock Blockers."

Something else: The AF is not out shopping for missions to justify the cost of CSAR. Pete, based on your posts your experience with Pave guys is Afghanistan; we're there doing that mission because the Army put out an RFF, due to shortfalls of Medevac assets. The mission set in OIF is very much different. The crux of your argument is correct, we train for a different mission and it just so happens that the required skill set lends itself well to other missions.

For anyone curious about what a good survivor is, read the account of Dale Zelko (Vega 31) and compare it to O'Grady (Basher 52). Basically Zelko was close to perfect and O'Gradey was plain lucky. You facilitate your own rescue.

What would be the point of nuking the south? Chemical weapons? Sure. But nukes would destroy the industrial base, which is the real prize for the chonger. Besides all this saber rattling to get the DPRK back in the fore-front of US foreign efforts and garner aide to his population; the only way he invades the south IMHO is if he feels a threat to his seat of power. Talk of things like regime change and threats to his legitimacy as ruler could set him off.

Threadjack coming.. Sorry for you guys who hate the idea, but if the price to pay to get a two piece flight suit is the gay tiger stripe, I will happily play along. Hey, I have to take a dump, instead of ranger rolling my flight suit in the vain attempt to prevent shit water on the floor from staining my bag, I'll just take the top off and throw it over the wall. Hey, instead of basically getting naked in combat to take a dump, I'll just drop my pants. Instead of wearing a ridiculous shoulder holster that flops around, I'll wear a paddle holster that actually serves a useful purpose. That's just a pilot's input, ask your sweaties if they'd prefer a uniform where they could just take off their top and not become dangerously dehydrated while loading and pre-flighting the aircraft. Basically anyone I know who's flown with the two-piece flight suit universally prefers it in the AOR.

As to what Incompletepete said, even that SV650 will feel like a rocket coming off a 650 vStar. Go get you some test rides, then decide. Also keep in mind that the 600rr has so much power that you won't be able to touch even the 75% ability of the bike on a street, well at least without being insanely stupid.

Civilian outed him eh? A cranky ex?

A Toast... Some things never change. I went to school with Mark, he built a potato gun so large and powerful that to ignite the chamber reliably, he wired up a bank of capacitors to provide the spark. Damn thing would launch a honey bottle several hundred yards. During Saturday inspections he'd screw around constantly, run by your room (I was a freshman) and wing a handful of pennies into your room.

I don't get the "beneath" part, I do know some people are trying to get our deployment tempo down and the 800lb Gorilla in the middle of the room means the only additional tasking we're likely to be successful in dropping is Medevac. Which I agree sucks, as the only deployment I've been on where I would have stayed for another tour if asked was my Medevac trip.

Good points Helodude, big point on scamming for NVG time. A recent Huey re-tread in my squadron has close to 50% more hours than I do, with about a year less flying experience, but less than half my NVG time. I'm curious how you think we've screwed ourselves, not that I disagree just curious what your take is.

Basically if we stay pure Rescue, we're too "specialized" if we adopt the SOF mission in addition, we're "duplicating effort." Hopefully someone realizes that the 160th is having problems with manning as well and having another pool of crew members to draw from would be a good thing. I guess HCS-84 is slipping under the radar since they're so damn small.

you'll be gone a lot as a 60 guy.

It seems to me that this guy had his heart in the right place, however he gave up on his proper chain of command all together. He should have continued to up channel the problems through the proper chain while simultaneously telling the Ops guys about what he found. In this way he'd have a couple O-5s on his side while still being able to say he was following proper procedure. When you find that shit is seriously f'd up, it's time to find high ranking guys to back your play, not just for self preservation but because those guys can actually fix shit.

Of all places, the 9th circuit court of appeals incorporates the 2nd amendment Interesting read to say the least. To add: We therefore conclude that the right to keep and bear arms is “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.” Colonial revolutionaries, the Founders, and a host of commentators and lawmakers living during the first one hundred years of the Republic all insisted on the fundamental nature of the right. It has long been regarded as the “true palladium of liberty.” Colonists relied on it to assert and to win their independence, and the victorious Union sought to prevent a recalcitrant South from abridging it less than a century later. The crucial role this deeply rooted right has played in our birth and history compels us to recognize that it is indeed fundamental, that it is necessary to the Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty that we have inherited.17 We are therefore persuaded that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment and applies it against the states and local governments.

dmeg, if we're talking about the F-117 crash I'm pretty sure the 60 just landed and the PJs grabbed him.

CSAR-X wasn't going to be unarmed either. Lightly armed, sure. And I'm not talking about machine guns.

Yep, pretty accurate. The original intent of transferring CSAR to AFSOC was to combat that cycle. If CSAR forces have a secondary role as SOF, the thought was we could maintain our funding level in times of non-crisis. We never went full AFSOC though, it was in name only.

Just put CAVEMAN on ignore it'll save you irritation