HeloDude
-
Posts
3,489 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
55
HeloDude's Achievements
Gray Beard (4/4)
2.3k
Reputation
-
Progressives like yourself have never been pro-Constitution, unless it supports their agenda. Conservatives have also never been pro-Constitution either. I’m not surprised you don’t understand
-
So you’re now supporting any American being able to own whatever weapon they want and no background check required? Trust me, I’m all for going full Libertarian (yes, the party and its platform) if that’s where we can go, but if not, let’s not pretend the leftists actually ever cared about the Constitution.
-
Progressives are now pro-Constitution, unless it’s the 1A, 2A, 10A…
-
Kind of like they were when Biden broke the law?…let me save you the suspense: The vast majority of Democrats will not be calling for her to be prosecuted and/or step down.
-
The left was all about going after Trump for petty crap, so I’m sure they’ll be fine with going after their own for the same thing.
-
Surely, you’re now limited to two posts a day of sharing anything from X. By all means, debate and enjoy the nonsense, but scale back on reposting random stuff from X.
-
I literally went to their website after your post and showed you that you were wrong. So you can’t answer the question: Can a person who is born a boy become a girl? Why should we take anything you say seriously when you can’t answer a simple yes or no question?
-
Kind of like how you said there wasn’t any mention on FoxNews the other day when the market took a big hit and yet you were clearly wrong. Here’s a question for you: Can a person who is born a boy become a girl?
-
I guess this is also bad? Asking for a friend… “We have offered zero-for-zero tariffs for industrial goods — as we have successfully done with many other trading partners — because Europe is always ready for a good deal, so we keep it on the table.” https://thehill.com/policy/international/5236107-european-union-tariff-negotiations/amp/
-
But, but… So you cared enough to specifically mention Vietnam a couple days ago, but now it doesn’t matter to you since it doesn’t support your original argument. For the record, I don’t know how Trump’s tariff strategy is going to work. He has a little over a year to show the rest of us that it worked, and if not, I imagine the GOP will do pretty bad in 2026. And if Trump still can’t turn it around by 2028, then the Dems will most likely be fully in charge by a healthy margin, until the next crisis occurs. I’m older enough to remember in 1993 when the Dems thought they were unstoppable, but then got a huge reality check in the 1994 election, but then Clinton still won handily in 1996. Similar to what happened in 2008…Dems thought they were unstoppable, but then 2010 and 2014 (and of course 2016) happened. So BL: We’ll have to wait and see.
-
Not a “single” story…yet I just went to their website. But I’m sure you’ll have some excuse to somehow say you were correct:
-
Update on your Vietnam tariff discussion: https://www.cnbctv18.com/world/vietnam-wants-to-cut-tariffs-down-to-zero-after-us-reciprocal-tariffs-trump-says-19584921.htm
-
The GOP gained Senate seats?
-
I honestly appreciate the legitimate question. I’m very anti-tariff on principle…because I’m very anti-tax on principle. Now Trump saying he can use tariffs (or their threat) to better position us wrt trade agreements, then I’d like to see what that can do strategy wise. Because let’s not pretend that tariffs on our exports with other countries (not necessarily speaking about Canada) are very fair. But tariffs for the sake of tariffs, yeah, they suck…just like all the other taxes. But politically, does anybody rationally think that Trump’s greatest opposition in the US wrt to tariffs are because those same people are against taxes?
