HeloDude

I just have a hard time taking anything a Lt says seriously.

You mean--just think of the amount 'YOU' will save on ammo.

Ram--seriously, this really gets its own thread? Somebody at least post pictures of boobies or something then.

So according to Bill Maher (people can call him a comedian all they want, but he's very much a political influence on the left), redistribution of wealth is a good thing because it keeps the poor people from kidnapping you. And here I thought redistribution was so that Democrats could have more votes? https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/05/12/maher_if_youre_rich_you_should_be_begging_the_government_to_redistribute_your_wealth.html

Cabeals has PMC X-tac 62-gr .223 brass for $.45/round, max 5 boxes. This is the best price I have seen since mid Dec...prices have been slowly coming down again the past couple of weeks. If anybody needs 100 rounds, it's not a bad price at all these days. https://www.cabelas.com/catalog/product.jsp?productId=1431879&categoryId=0&parentCategoryId=0&subCategoryId=0&indexId=0&productVariantId=3195132&quantity=1&itemGUID=4f97061bac1084584a31c2946a5d5d8b&WTz_l=CQO&destination=/checkout/item_added_to_cart.jsp?result=success&productId=1431879&fromCQO=true&backToPreviousUrl=/catalog/search_catalog_command.cmd?item1=FD-218426&item2=&item3=&item4=&item5=&item6=&item7=&item8=&item9=&item10=&&dropDownGroupValues:0=258&WTz_l=CQO&avad=48247_c4476f1b&WT.mc_id=al35987&rid=12&WT.tsrc=AFF

What the hell!!? My imaginary girlfriend is way hotter than Manti Teo's and Maxim didn't list her on their 'Hot 100' list... https://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/05/10/Manti-Teos-Imaginary-Girlfriend-Makes-Maxims-Hot-100-List

You have to love hearing what the liberals truly believe when they're caught off guard with an unknown open-mic. Anybody who doesn't believe that confiscation (similar to that of most European countries, Australia, etc) is the true goal of the liberals is either fooling themselves or is on the same team as these guys. https://www.examiner.com/article/open-mike-reveals-n-j-senators-contempt-for-gun-owners-confiscation-goal

Ok dude, you went from your argument being that this alleged past affair now makes it more likely that he assaulted that chick, to...what's on a security clearance request form...getting a little bit in the weeds to say the least. Overall though, by your reasoning, everything Bill Clinton or Gen Patreus said was a lie since they both cheated on their wives, and additionally, at least in the case of clinton Clinton, originally lied about it too. Oh, and does that mean that Clinton also assaulted those women he allegedly slept with even before being President, being that one directly has to do with the other, right? I thought you were done talking about this subject? Here's a tip--don't become a lawyer.

I'm glad the Secretary decided to this for the entire military...because in the Air Force, we just had ours a few months ago and everything has been smooth sailing since then, no problems at all...nope, not a single one.

I like it...frankly I wish he took the same approach with Fast and Furious.

"Does this mean I no longer get to go to Air War College in residence?"

Since when has that ever helped any guy get laid?

Dude, you're a tool. You argue this as well as you argue everything else--based off of emotion. You're not a chick, are you? If the AF wants to investigate this guy for something he may have done 9 years ago then I'm assuming that's definitely within their lane of authority (not sure if there is a time limit on brining up such charges)--though they would be singleing him out to a degree because there are a lot more people than you think cheating on their wives...and husbands, and most people just look the other way. But to say that because a guy cheated on his wife 9 years ago gives more evidence that he assualted the recent chick is pretty stupid. Evidence is evidence and the 3-star tossed his conviction because be didn't believe there was sufficient evidence in the trial to uphold the conviction. Try thinking with your brain for a change...

I understand your thought process--but for the sake of argument, what do you mean when you say 'the gun control is fizzling'? I agree that since it has been several months since the last major shooting and now that the Senate vote has come and gone, that the issue is not as front and center in the average American's cross check as it was earlier...and I agree that's good for bringing prices down and availability back closer to normal with respect to firearms and somewhat with respect to ammo. But what happens when there is another mass shooting? You're fooling yourself if you don't think there will be another one in the next 2,3,5,7 years--who knows when, but it will happen. So what then? We play this game all over again? The anti-gun folks will not go away and will be waiting patiently to exploit the next tragedy just as they were with this one. I am just curious how you see...or even how you 'hope' to see this gun control issue play out. Because like I said, the issue will not just go away, and there will be other shootings to reignite the powder keg--so what then? I agree that the less shootings there are the better the argument for the pro-gun folks and vice versa the other way around. Are you just hoping this settles down long enough for you and others to stock up, to help get a pro-gun President and legislature elected, to get more people into shooting/being supporters of The 2nd Amendment...? Legitimate questions that I would like to hear you or anybody else answer. The way I see it, the issue shouldn't even be up for debate and though in the short term it's easier to have the issue lay dormant, it doesn't really do you much good in the long term.

Hmmm...I could argue either for or against it. For it: It's civil disobedience which will also help highlight the issue and their cause on a national level--that carrying a gun doesn't mean you're automatically going to start shooting, plus that it's a Right protected under The Constitution and people are willing to go to prison over it. Against it: In reality, will it really do that much, if anything to change the discussion? Anti-gun people will not be swayed by such an event, even if is peaceful. And as for generating more support for the movement, I think the pro-gun support side is already pretty damn strong. Also, for these guys (though I believe they are morally correct)...is it worth all the heartache of getting arrested, attorney fees, potential jail time...and even worse, possibly being a convicted felon and then not being allowed to purchase a firearm again? Strong price to pay to make a statement. I get what these guys are trying to do, and I support their passion and their convictions, I just don't know if now is the time, reason being the question: Are we to this point yet? This all being said, I'm curious to see what will happen and how it will go down. Either way, I don't really see it making the argument much, if at all, worse for the pro-gun side.

I think he just saw that her blouse and jeans were on a little crooked... Remember way back when in ROTC: "Permission to touch?"

Are you trying to say that this story is 'ironic'?...because that song by Alanis Morissette is full of ironic things. Or is it just full of things that suck, ie winning the lottery and dying the next day, now that just sucks if it's you.

Not quite sure if that was his only goal...he had a lot of ammunition and other resources that suggests to me he desired to do more than just take some shots at some LE with the hopes of them killing him. But agree that the outcome was almost the best they could have hoped for considering the circumstances. I just like to point out the hypocrisy of the media and the 'gun control' left--if they don't have victims to exploit, it's not worth their time. Besides, they hate the fact that Sandy Hook involved a gunman going against the unarmed vs this nut who went against the very well armed: Which outcome was better?

I wonder why this one didn't make overwhelming national news as it plays right into the agenda of the unConstitutional 'gun control' tyrants?...perhaps because thankfully there are no dead victims to exploit? Or perhaps because the police proved that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun? My bet is a combination of both...politicians could care less about victims as they only pretend to care when it helps them further their own ideological agenda. Thankfully this asshole took on a bunch of armed folks instead of shooting up a playground. https://www.nydailyne...ticle-1.1335608

Was this before or after the two had a chance to compete the 'Eiffel Tower'. Who would have ever though the wobbly-H would be so dangerous. Though the real question is...how is BQZip's mom doing after this whole ordeal?

I heard a rumor that the AFPC guy also said that since the airlines are going to start their hiring boom next month that the bonus will be increased to $35K/year and that the guy on BO who goes by Butters is always wrong about the airlines and that matmacwc knows all. Sorry guys...I need some BO entertainment since nobody has posted anything good recently.

I'm not saying that's a 'bad' deal...after all, it does come with a pretty good optic, but IMO, there are better AR's out there for even a better price. The Colt AR specifically comes to mind.

True...but a Congressman is not part of 'leadership' per se. But yes, we are required to give them their due respect. Which is why I have never said anything negative about any public official ever.

You're smoking crack...'good for a while'--Collins sucks, especially the last several years...and now we know he really likes to suck <zing!>. I'm not a big Tebow fan but the dude won the Heisman and helped take a team to the playoffs (along with a playoff win) his first season. So the dude's gay, big deal. I bet Manti Te'o is gay too, but if the dude can play ball (no pun intended that time) then San Diego will be lucky to have him. I thought a person's sex life wasn't supposed to matter?