HeloDude

Saw 'The Chronicle' the other night--definitely not a bad film if you're looking for something to watch. Its neat, interesting, and weird all rolled up into one.

If you are saying that Iraq is a failure, what is your reason for doing so? And if it is a failure (as you suggest), then by what metrics would Iraq need to achieve for it to be labeled a 'success'?

Probably a good reason to wait until you retire/separate to get these new toys.

My guess is that she was nervous...just like the first time she came in contact with Rainman.

Agreed, but I have found a place recently that is selling them for $300. I'll prob pull the trigger soon and get one, do the conversion.

Appears as though appropriate critiques have already been made...I just love how you were so quick to fight on the argument, but then again, it suits you well. The President and his staff have every right to appoint who they want to be MAJCOM/CC and receive a 4th star, but there is always a reason for doing everything when you're a politician (regardless of the party), and the decision is not made in a bubble and is not 100% based off objective reasoning. Really dude? The fact that she is a woman had nothing to do with the administration's decision? I'm a conservative libertarian and even I'm not naive enough to think that Bush and his staff's decision to invade Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with oil and/or politics. Give me a break man. There's also a political reason for every big decision/act those guys make. If you don't agree, then you've really filled yourself up on the kool-aid. Homework assignment for you (I'm too lazy on a weekend to check)...show me a male general officer in the Air Force that was promoted 3 times within 2 1/2-3 years to the rank of 4 star? Bottom line is that I hope she will do a good job in the position and do what's best for the force. Just don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining.

They're called Test Pilots.

Make no mistake about it--this nomination is purely political on the part of the administration. I'm not saying she can't do the job, but what makes her better than all the other guys available who are more well rounded--ie rated with acquisition experience and combat/deployment time? The administration wants more gender and racial diversity in the upper ranks--again (for all the liberals on here), not saying she can't do the job, but is she really the most qualified?...or just in a position to become the first female Air Force 4 star General? We all rant and make comments when the Air Force likes to point out "First all female tanker crew", "First all female F-15 2-Ship over Afghanistan", blah blah blah...this is just another example, except that it's really high vis.

From what I understand, OMB Express is closing their doors. Bud's LE rate is always a good option--bought several guns from there and then used the S&W Rebate. Good stuff.

Well, she has been picked (if her 4th star goes through, sure it will) to be the AFMC/CC so if she has never been a commander, then yes, this will be her first command.

Looking at this chick's picture just made me soft. "I like her red hair. I wonder if the carpet matches her pubes."

That right there is the problem. Though I believe that none of the commanders are ok with suicides occurring (leadership does suck, but I don't think they're full of hatred), they only do these kinds of things when they're told to and/or when their leadership puts their asses on the line for having too many suicides, DUI's, etc. I firmly believe that 90.69% of O-6's and above (you can also include BTZ O-5's) will always put their own self interests above what is truly the right thing to do. Often times their own self interests naturally match up with what is the right thing to do for people and the mission (ie take care of wounded soldiers because leadership is told to so and they'll look bad if they don't do it), but other times, these 'leaders' will do whatever is necessary to impress their own bosses and make sure that their own records shine--regardless of whether it's the right (read integrity) thing to do. They are "Yes Men" in the purest form. Again, this is just my opinion...but you know what, it's close to the same opinion of the majority of my peers. And if we're wrong, then there is obviously a disconnect...but a disconnect none the less, and then the leadership should do something about it, because this opinion has negative effects. A leader is someone who inspires you to do what is needed...a manager just tells you what they believe needs to be done and then makes sure go ahead and do it. We have a lot of managers in the upper ranks.

Not sure if any of you guys have seen this, but it's a great reason to get some Starbucks on Valentine's Day. I might even decide to open carry that day, just because...

Quick range report from this weekend after shooting my new M&P .22 Pistol: I got the gun a few days after ordering from KYGunCO.com (great price by the way at $360, not including FFL) and right away way saw that it was packaged like any other S&W--hard case, typical rope lock included, etc. Doing the inspection at my FFL, she definitely looked sharp--just like a full size version of my MP40c. I've read not to dry fire it, but I did a couple of times just to make sure there weren't any obvious issues. Took her to the range this weekend and loaded it with Remington 36 grain, 1280 FPS hollow points (on sale a couple months ago and works well with my M&P-15-22). Shooting at my outdoor range at 7 yards, right out of the box, it worked flawlessly. Sights were dead on and I was getting some nice, tight groupings. The gun felt great in my hand, and needless to mention, had little felt recoil. The slide locks back to the rear after the last round--this is my first .22 pistol, and since I hadn't shot a .22 pistol in over 14 years, I could remember if most .22 pistols do or not lock to the rear after the last round (the Ruger LCP does not). With the help of my buddy, ended up putting about 100 rounds through it without a single failure. My friend was also very impressed and talked about getting one so that he can better teach his girlfriend how to shoot. Bottom line, if you couldn't already tell--an awesome .22! Definitely a solid purchase if you're looking for a .22 to train with and save money when shooting. My only complaint is that the gun only comes with 1 12-round magazine. I've looked online for more mags, but since the gun just came out last summer, they're few and far between. My first 'range report'...hope it helps!

Shipped yesterday, hopefully arrives at the FFL by the end of this week, and in my hands at the range Sat or Sun. I haven't shot a .22 pistol in years...so long that I can't remember the last time, might have been in college. The reviews looked really good and I'll be happy to give a range report afterwards. S&W puts out a quality product IMO, so I doubt there will be any issues. Now if only Kel Tec would stop being a crappy company (via a business point of view) and produce more KSG's so I can get my hands on one without paying double the price on gunbroker.

Texas is a 'Shall Issue' state...if you qualify and do what is required, the state has to give you a permit, regardless of the county you live in, etc.

I love my MP 15-22! Great gun to take out on the range, practice fundamentals, and just a great gun to have fun plinking--and what's best--it's cheap as hell to shoot. IMO, there's no need for a kid to have any special optics on his 22. Teaching the fundamentals just don't require them, besides, he'd be better off getting his son another 22 (pistol) and work on those fundamentals as well. Speaking of .22 pistols, check out this new guy I just bought! Been eying one of these for the past 2-3 months and finally saw a good price and bought one today--should be delivered next week to my FFL. I'm definitely a S&W fan and this will allow me to work on drills at a much cheaper cost. Plus when I take a new chick out to the range, it will be easier for her shoot than one of my .40's.

What is my girlfriend doing 'Tebowing'?

Funny...I've seen her in a lot of 'special' videos

Hence the binary system...1 is you would, 0 is you wouldn't.

Haha...actually it was at jab at everyone, especially including me! But you're my inspiration M2 for buying more firearms ;)

Definitely a valid point to make as it is important to never stop learning and training/increasing your abilities to effectively use firearms. Having said that, as a non LE guy/someone who doesn't regularly handle firearms in my everyday job, shooting also serves a recreational purpose in my life along with its most important role of self defense. Most of us buy guns for the mere pleasure of owning and shooting them, and that's quite fine as it's all about personal decisions in regards to how and what people spend their money. So if guys want to spend a few hundred bucks on a stock that will put a smile on their face, then why not? As for the price of ammo, running cheap 7.62 ammo through an old AK doesn't really cost that much compared to when people are spending hundreds of dollars every few months on firearms that they don't really need. Again, all personal preference. I would argue that most gun owners probably don't have their firearms adequately protected against house fires and theft. A top quality gun safe (not a RSC) costs 5-6K minimum--you're more likely to have a house fire or a break in vs having to engage someone with your AR-15 in a 'tactical' situation. Just another perspective to add to the conversation!

So I know a lot of you guys aren't a fan of the Slide Fire Solutions stock (SSAR), but it's neat to see that they finally came out with one for the AK. M2, are you going to buy one? I'm planning on eventually getting one for the AR since guys have gotten it to work with the MP-15-22. And you never know, I might just buy another AK (a cheap one) and get the SSAK. And yes, it serves no purpose other than to be silly and have some fun shooting. Here's another one worth watching. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=K6PNxiLRvHI&NR=1

Nice man! And for $8 definitely worth getting!

What kind of AK is it? Who imported it? edit for spelling