brabus

I'm not sure where the disconnect is, but what you're arguing for is an F-35, an "LO strike platform and missile truck" as you call it. The reason 4th gen will be around until 2045 is because we don't have enough money to afford an AF full of only 5th gen - there'd only be F-22 and F-35 if we had all the money in the world/had made significantly better decisions when it came to acquisitions and program management. F-22 and F-35 are complimentary, we just simply can't afford enough of them.

It absolutely would not be more capable unless we're talking about a complete redesign (software and hardware) that would make the F-35 program look like "best seen to date." A more capable 5th/6th gen A/G fighter is currently called F-X and will probably not see the light of day until the 2030s and probably won't be useful until mid to late 2040s...unless we learn from our acquisitions/program mistakes, but who honestly thinks that'll happen?

You just described the F-35. This debate is useless. Lets scream for more F-22s because we absolutely need them in the A/A realm, not because we have a misguided idea that somehow a FB-22 would be better than an F-35.

This shouldn't be surprising, but the Raptor is not an A/G fighter; it's what we all think - an A/A fighter with a few cool A/G capes, but not nearly enough to really execute AI, AO, CAS, etc. It's quite ridiculous to think producing 500 more Raptors solves our "A/G gaps." I'm absolutely a huge supporter of producing more if it was doable, but I want it for what it's built for, not for a delirious dream that it is anything but an A/A fighter with a few niche capes to help out on the A/G side.

I asked Memphis when I was there and they said no problem (whether you're overseas for deployment or stationed). I think the only catch is you have a limited time to get it done once back in the US (6 months is what I remember, but not 100% sure on that).

Shit. to another fallen bro. Prayers for his family and friends.

Good point - generation probably has at least something to do with it. Though at least the several dudes I know who are in the "current war generation" still are quiet about it...their parents must have done that parenting thing, a very lacking thing nowadays.

My CC had it in his email a few days ago

I don't think I've ever ran across someone who talked themselves/their experiences up who did not turn out to be completely full of shit. Every "real deal" I have interacted with doesn't say shit about their job outside of the work environment.

I love the "turns night into day" propaganda in the video...completely oversold. That said, there's a lot more to DAS than simply "you can see through the floor!" Champ nailed it on force composition. 4th gen assets are projected out to 2040+...the F-35 crowd will have the last laugh when all the Vipers and Eagles are 3g limited because they have 20K hours on the airframe. It won't be a problem though, since I'm sure the 6th gen acquisition process will go really well.

Binoculars included (and encouraged by dear leader) with every NoDAK porn site

Have not heard great things about them, but that's just WOM. I looked into them as well before going to Memphis, glad I made the decision to go up to TN.

Interesting. Related note, I got a crossbreed IWB about a month ago and really like it. Comfortable, high quality build, perfect hold on the gun, good draw (for an IWB), etc. Highly recommend them.

Damn, down 11% as well. That said, aren't you grandfathered in to your current BAH for the length of your current assignment?

I don't follow.

The DOD is WELL ahead of you on that one. Guys, remember, stealth is the flashy word that gets thrown around in the news, facebook 5th gen bashing, etc. People much smarter than you and I have thought about and developed solutions regarding problem sets like this before you even realized the F-35 was a thing. It's not all about stealth, and dudes on the internet are not the first ones to think of that mind blowing idea.

DOD: "Stitch, can we pay you $6.9 billion dollars to be the middle man who brokers this deal? Also, it's cool if post-contract signing you fuck us over and require millions more to fix a contract breach you're 100% responsible for. Also, have you by chance seen the S&M Man, we're kind of into that sort of thing."

Won't happen.

Anyone who believes our cheap blues represent "heritage and tradition" to an extent we warrant forced wear haven't been outside their cubicle at shoe palace, ever (said cubicle is shipped to the Deid for them to get "their combat time.") How do "combat utility" uniforms not significantly outweigh blues when it comes to accomplishments throughout history and spawning of tradition? I think we should all have to paint our faces black during black history month, you know, to really help our heritage sink in. Dammit, I just gave some E-9 a great idea and EPR bullet.

I'm guessing it was the same 22 yr old we had. I was impressed with her instructional ability, and not bad on the eyes as well.

Manchester.

Same for me - I'm guessing they'd tell someone directly if off chance they were going to fly the Comanche. They're a great operation, so I highly doubt they would leave anyone hanging on something like that.

Why is that - just trying to prop up long term safety from BRAC? I ask because, while it makes sense to do something like this to help the overall RPA problem, I'm surprised a squadron would actively seek RPAs when it already has a mission/aircraft.

Well there you have it. Did they give you a cranium's up you'd be flying the Comanche? Reason I ask is we were never told either way and naturally assumed it was the Duchess since all of the gouge from multiple sources (including Downtown) was Duchess only. Would have sucked to show up Day 1 and find out we'd studied the wrong stuff for 6-9 hrs. Mostly curious for future dudes - should they be prepared for either due to a scenario of one breaking the day prior to showing up and the other being spared in for their ATP.