SocialD

This is pretty much my plan of attack with my GTC. I don't put anything on it that isn't reimbursable. If it's not paid, I just let it ride, and attach any late fees to the voucher. Eventually you will show up on someones list and questions will be asked. It usually gets fixed pretty quickly. No fuckin way I'm paying 3k of my own money because of their incompetence. So now I have a GTC that is cutoff and late fees are piling up (which I just add to my voucher). Funny part is finance tried threatening me by saying I wouldn't be able to go TDY since my GTC was about to be cutoff.

Our finance cringes every time our OG calls or shows up at the office. He's pretty much 100% on reg-offs vs our finance and they can't stand it. I can't even imagine their response if this were to happen.

I agree that you're a jackass if you brag to the WG/CC about not owning a uniform, especially if you get a stipend. I also agree that it's severe jackassery to make you ALL your people come in for an inspection because of one dude. I'm going on 17+ years and aside from my mess dress (which was paid for with a one time stipend), I've never paid for a uniform in my life. I've never owned a set of ABUs and will likely never own a set of OCPs, unless they issue me a set.

A major defense contractor did little (without serious amounts of cash) to help fix their ugly baby???? This is my shocked face... So glad we still use LOX.

I'll be very surprised if Tricare is still there when I hit 60 (part timer retirement)...at least in anywhere near it's current form. I'm fairly confident the pension will be there, although they may have long stopped yearly COLAs by the time I get there. Like social security, when I run my retirement numbers, I assume it wont be there. If they happen to be there, all the better.

For the guys looking to get out of AD...If the squadron requires more than 4-5 days/month, look elsewhere. It seems like no big deal now, but when you grow up and get a real job (even an airline gig), anything more than 5 days/month is ridiculous. IMHO, 7 days/month is an unreasonable and unsustainable expectation. Of course, I'm not talking about TDY...just month-to-month expectations.

This is my shocked face at the shoot, then aim mentality the military always takes in these cases. Don't worry, if it turns out to be unfounded, they'll be sure to print the retraction on the bottom right corner of the back page of the AF times...and his career will still be ruined.

Depends upon the state. I know a Lt Col in another state that did not do SOS or ACSC (golf clap!)... Then there is my state, which puts you down as a DNP if you haven't done ACSC. However, we have had people ROPMA without it, so there's that. It can get really muddy when the state doesn't recognize the federal promotion...or something like that. Another squadron in the state had this happen to a pilot. From second hand info, he was paid as an O5 but had to wear O4 rank (unless on title 10, lol). If true, that's what I call 2 birds, one stone! Like 2020 said, the difference is ballwash, or about $400/month for me. Due to my enlisted time, even if I promote right away (not likely due to control grade issues), I'd have to stay an extra 2.5 years to retire with a full Lt Col retirement. Given how quickly the situation is deteriorating in the military, I have zero intention of staying in a day past 20, so it's really not worth it to me. Edit: Just opened my email and see my GTC was shut off for non-payment...from a voucher I signed quite a while ago. Lol, guess I can't go TDY anymore. The AF is so fucked! The donut of misery shows ~1,000 days until retirement.

All because of some ridiculous internet outcry...what a fucking joke! A great case of, if you can't do something valuable, do some things visible. Dude will look back on this and realize he is far better off not being a part of this toxic, bullshit laden sinking ship. Retirement can't get here fast enough.

In Fresno?

By the book, it's long enough by 1 foot...in practice, it doesn't always work. I'm just saying that we likely could have paid for chutes many times over with the money spent on losses/repairs. In our airspace, we're almost always out of a one-to-one, with a chute we'd like have 1 or 2 options. Our home airport has 2 runways but only one long enough, so we're always single runway ops (read: carrying extra gas/lost training). A chute would allow us to use the other runway and drop our bingos to give us more training time in the airspace. Moot point now, but it seems pretty short sighted by the AF to not buy the system, when they're already making them for so many other countries.

Man, they're still attacking that 1,500 hour requirement. In 2012 I was a first year regional guy and my base pay was $19,000 ($21/hr). At the same airline, it's now $37,000 ($41/hr) + $17,500 if you stay a year (somewhat pro-rated if you leave early). If nothing else this rule has forced the regionals to pay a basic living wage. This is a good thing...let's hope the military is not successful in killing this requirement.

All that is required for a part timer to get a good year is 50 points (you get 15 for just being in). This is exactly what I would do if I were in my final year and AFRC/ANG tried to play these "annual" mickey mouse games of a blanket stop loss. A while back, this used to be a fairly common practice with the soon to be retired guys. No one saw it as douchery, just standard and expected. I expect that this will become a fairly common tactic once again. With the addition of the AD guys into the squadron (and their added sortie requirements), it will likely be welcomed by scheduling as we can barely get guys RAP as it is. Having said that, I wouldn't recommend the "Braveheart" approach unless you really have leadership that deserves it. LOL. EDIT: Remembering JADEDs posts a few pages back, this is what I would do if I were him.

Glad the pilots ok. How many jets have we run off the end in situations like this and high speed aborts? How many have been lost because there were no runways long enough within gliding distance? Off the top of my mind I can think of 6 or 7 losses. ...what would have been the cost of having/maintaining chutes like so many foreign buyers have?

RVs are awesome planes and I had the order form filled out for an RV-7. However, after talking with quite a few builders I decided to hold off, maybe down the road. Orbit gave a pretty good description above about the various RVs. I'll add that I really wanted the RV-9 but after lots of research figured you're much better off with the RV-7. They're pretty close to the same plane, but the 7 is aerobatic. This is huge for resale value! If you like the Kitfox, you have got to check out this guys videos. His day job deals with filming/expensive cameras, plus he lives near a bunch of BLM land, which means he can land anywhere can make awesome videos. Also, check out the Rans S-7 or S-20 if you're interested in an alternative to the Kitfox. I've flown with a few Captains recently that have built the S-7 and they love them. I've flown both, they are a blast to fly and they're essentially the same plane, but the 7 is tandem and the 20 is side-by-side. I ended up going with the Rans S-21 and my wing kit is showing up to my garage in a few hours. I don't really care to fly aerobatics in an aircraft that doesn't have an ejection seat, and would rather bounce around the local dirt strips, with the occasional weekend trip. It's relatively new, but much of his stuff is being reused from other kits he has designed. It's STOL-like but will cruise around 155mph @ 75% with a 180hp motor. For me the build time/complexity was a huge factor, and that's another place this plane excels. Given that it's all aluminum (CNC milled parts...read very little drilling/deburring) and built mostly with blind rivets, they're forecasting 500 hours, not including paint. Based on a few bloggers that have already started their wings, that seems fairly accurate. On top of that, there are very few times where you need another person there to help you, which is key since I live by myself and don't want to have to always bribe my buddies to buck rivets for me. Here is one that is already built. It's hard to tell in the pic, but the doors and roof are all lexan...great for visibility. Cargo space is pretty awesome and is easy to access due to the large door and seat that fold down quite a bit.

PM sent. Moving this to GA thread.

Same...I'm receiving the first part of my plane kit tomorrow. Not an RV though.

I don't believe there is anything wrong with having another job, as long as it's OK'd by the boss. Did any of those officers go into their other jobs with full intention of NOT working there after they get on property? IMHO (which isn't worth much), it seems like an abuse of a law that is meant to protect us when we have to drill, go TDY, deploy or even fill a vital role in the squadron that pops up down the road. WRT to something legal vs unethical. Watched this happen... Dude doesn't pre-post MLOA and gets assigned a 6-day coverage trip (means he didn't want it but got it because he's junior) that spans Christmas eve/day. Due to manning he is unable to drop the trip. He then uses one day of MLOA on the first day of the trip to drop it. He immediately picks up a highly lucrative trip that started on day 2 of the original trip. This trip gets him back home Christmas eve morning. I'm sure he will go do some mil duty at the base, but to use MLOA to get a holidays off is a bit unethical, though totally legal.

Are you really surprised? There are plenty that use USERRA to have their cake and eat it too. I have witnessed some pretty unethical, albeit totally legal, shit go down with respect to using MLOA to ones advantage...and others disadvantage. Then people wonder why the company is looking a little closer at our MLOA or asking a question or two when you start changing stuff around post schedule release.

I'm sure there are people who will love it. We have some people who can't pass a PT test, I'm sure they will love this as they can just get out of the military and keep their job. Not saying that's your guy but one reason some will love it. As Guardian says below it will also be a great thing for the enlisted guys who wish to keep a job after retirement from the military. It will be a great thing for the AGRs who retire and still need a job to make ends meet. On the plus side, we maintain that experience, which is one thing that sets the ARC above the AD in many respects. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but we definitely have Title 5 guys who are also DSGs. There are now a lot of things that they can't be compelled to do unless they're in a mil status, such as CBRNE/SABC training...although they can be forced to attend Green dot training since civilians do that as well. I just hope they make our medical staff AGR, it's maddening when you need to get a shot but they don't have anyone in a mil status to administer the shot. Agree with your last sentence.

I've only had a few minute conversion with a buddy and he didn't seem to excited. Among other things, he said they're not allowed to wear military issued gear other than steeltoe boots...everything else they must foot the bill. On the upside, they can work a title 5 job and NOT be in the military...something our current technicians can't do.

...and a Harrier in DJ. Here's hoping for a good outcome at Nellis.

ANG or AFRC? Did they say for how long? We only get enough pay cards for 4 days/month, I'd start by only showing up for those days.

My guess is those were all "volunteers," I still have yet to see an ANG pilot be involuntarily individually mobed. The good will and volunteers will/are already drying up extremely fast. We've been sent to multiple non-combat deployments (TSP) and have already lost guys who don't want to deploy to go fly CT...we'll lose more. I've heard the same is happening in some of the tankers squadrons out there. Having said that, I have no illusions that they're not feverishly trying to figure out the red tape to tap ANG guys for 365s! At least they're trying to unfuck 12301d vs 12304b bullshit, so there's that...

Stand alone Guard squadrons are your last bastion of hope. We still have our issues, but nowhere near what AD/Reserves have. I wouldn't even consider a Guard TFI squadron these days. 2020s comments above are why I keep telling all my AD bros to go to the Guard and NOT the Reserves. Reserves are a totally different animal when compared to the Guard, and they seem to be AD lite. I have yet to hear of any Guard guys being individually involuntarily mobilized for anything. Im sure it's only a matter of time, but they're still not here for now. Again, stand alone Guard squadrons are your best bet.