pawnman

Someone who was hired on merit wouldn't struggle so much with incredibly predictable questions.

Just a reminder that these people had parents who opposed LGBT curriculum that included graphic depictions of oral sex branded as "domestic terrorists" by the FBI. https://thenationaldesk.com/news/americas-news-now/doj-memo-which-compared-parents-to-terrorists-allegedly-requested-by-education-secretary-miguel-cardona-national-school-board-association-white-house-education-deparment-justice-marrick-garland-nsba-school-board-domestic-doj-doe

This is the state that banned large sodas, so...

Guns and bullets. If a fiat currency collapses the way you're talking about, people with guns and bullets will just take the gold from people who don't have guns and bullets.

I don't think people are inherently bad, but I do think anyone narcissistic enough to think they should dictate rules to 330 million people is.

As I already said... this is some of the cheapest and most effective military spending we've ever done. Taking out a near-peer adversary without a single American casualty is a win in my book.

I wish this was the level of political scandal we were dealing with in the US.

Sure. But one wonders things like: Why did it take 18 months? Why was it a raid instead of requesting it from the lawyers? Why was it urgent to raid Trump's house 90 days before the midterms, and not last year? Why wasn't Hillary's house raided in similar fashion? And this isn't in isolation. One may also wonder: Why handcuff Navarro at an airport instead of having his lawyer bring him in for questioning? Why does the Jan 6th committee seem so interested in the testimony of someone not in the vehicle, but has no interest in interviewing the secret service agent driving the vehicle, after it was claimed Trump tried to wrestle with the steering wheel? Why is there no cross examination of witnesses for the Jan 6th committee? Maybe you think this is all impartial. I sure don't see it that way.

So Biden SHOULDN'T be wielding the FBI as a cudgel against Trump? Glad you came around.

I'm saying these documents can't be that important if they're willing to wait a year and a half to get them.

And you don't think waiting 18 months and dropping the warrant 90 days prior to the midterms is political? I'm sticking with "but his documents" as the rallying cry.

I'm not interested in signing any more ADSCs, no matter how much money they offer...but am I reading that first line correctly thar the top end monthly flight pay is increasing to $1500?

So either charge Hillary now, or leave Trump alone. The way they're going about this give a very strong perception that the FBI is being weaponized against Biden's political enemies.

Today in green energy... https://energynewsbeat.co/scotland-cut-down-14-million-trees-to-make-way-for-wind-turbines/

Just saw Donk talk about this mission to the group of AFROTC cadets graduating Field Training this week. Pretty impressive stuff...he's lucky it was the start of the war...I could see this getting someone court martialed for the disregard for the ROE. Thank God he cared more about the guys on the ground than his own career.

I'll believe it when I see the FBI and media start rolling up some democrats. I fully believe that Biden is weaponizing federal law enforcement against political opponents, same way Obama did with the IRS a decade ago. And it's real hard to take Dem leadership seriously when they talk about law and order after they used "but her emails" as a taunt for the last 6 years. Maybe Trump just needs to do the same thing. "But his documents!"

There's a big difference between "capable CAS platform" and "best CAS platform". Sure, in a permissive environment, I'd prefer an A-10 overhead. But I'd take an F-35 over nothing. There aren't enough A-10s to provide CAS everywhere, all the time. The F-35 is good enough at it to step into the role when necessary.

It's more the ability to recognize a pattern of behavior from the media and DOJ. Who knows, maybe this is the one time they're actually accurate. But the record of reporting makes me reluctant to accept the reporting at face value.

That's why the FBI raided Hillary Clinton's house to take her email servers... I agree that Trump should be held accountable. But my faith in the agencies of the DOJ to act impartially is at an all-time low.

I think it's far more common that these assholes are toxic way back as captains. It's rare that someone's entire personality changes when they are put in a position of power. Rather, they no longer have to hide the toxicity from they're peers/bosses.