StoleIt

It's art people. Flying horses, dragons, swords, Mp40's, chicks firing a Browning .50 Cal with 1 hand, and hogs shooting AMRAAMS. Who cares?! I still want one!

My jaw is on the floor. These are crazy. Anyone know the artist by chance? I want some prints! I mean seriously...damn! I just can't find a signature or any background on the pictures.

What a bunch of whiners... And I wonder what that guy did after he retired to be able to make the 20mil down payment on that baby...

Yea I know those two Hawgs exist, but my point was more toward actually produced versions for training. True. But I guess the -22 and -35 are different animals? Any stealth pilots here? Wonder how it was transitioning from -38's to -117's.

Well I am pretty slow and it just dawned on me... The F-22 definitly doesn't have a two seat trainer version...but operantly neither does the F-35. So in a couple decades when Vipers and Eagles have been retired...no more two seaters eh? Does the AF plan on stepping up some of the -38 training (or whatever its replacement might be)? Or does it expect simulators will be so realistic by then that all a stud needs is to pass -38's and then sims? Before this I think the Hog was one of the few jets that didn't have a two seat version for training. F-16D, F-15D, F-18D/F, TAV-8B. These are just the more modern ones... Thoughts?

I am a big DJ AM fan. Travis Barker and them do an amazing DJ/Drums set. Wish them a speedy recovery and my condolences to the families of those lost.

Sporties Pilot Shop has C172 and other GA planes. www.sportys.com And larger commercial GA here: https://www.presentsforpilots.com/training-...CFQJHxwodnDKmXw And if anyone can provide a link on where to snag an A-10C cockpit I would be forever indebted! Favorite airplane and it would probably always help to keep motivation up. And here are military squadron/profile posters (forgot their official names): https://www.squadrongraphics.com/printfinde...CFRKIxwodyRILXg

I just thought this was hilarious for some reason. I'll get back to searching for some babe themed ones.

I plan on making ends meet to get the new Camaro, probably a 2011 instead of 2010. My current line up right now is a 2006 Trailblazer SS (with a 400hp Ls2 V8) and a 2002 Camaro SS that is decently modified to 444rwhp/475rwtq. Sadly going to be selling the Camaro soon in anticipation of EADing and then the new Camaro.

Not a problem. I am a moderator over on Ls1Tech so this thread caught my attention. Fbody for life!

You mean 2nd Gen. 4th Gen is 93-02.

Wohoo conflicting information. I'm gonna go with M2's version.

Okay my time to be clueless...whats LPA stand for?

What you need is a hot water cooler! Or a cold water heater?

No, it's a snow cone maker.

I don't see this series ever measuring up to Band of Brothers. I agree acting isn't anywhere near as good. Guess I'll keep watching and hope it turns around at some point.

As long as we listen for "seismic anomalies" and we have Seaman Jones it shouldn't be a problem!

^I can't stop laughing at this one

Hmm the airplane pictured isn't a Tu-95 Bear, but rather the Tu-22 Backfire. Anywhooo, I don't think it makes much of a difference. Let the Ruskies put em there. Who cares? It's not like it would make any difference in an actual conflict. The people who are worried about bombers in Cuba are either dense or should constantly be freaking out because ICBM's and SLBM's are always in range. It's not a bomber we need to be worried about if it comes to a "game-on" war with Russia, its this:

^Not sure if this one has been used in this thread yet...

Better add a reflective belt or two...just in case....

So had my FC1 at Scott a couple months back and to make a long story short they forgot to write down my scores for the accommodation vision portion when I was in flight medicine. So back to the hospital I went and they discovered it blank and sent me to a different vision area (optometrist I'd guess). There they used a completely different method for the test, just a yard stick and a pen rather than some special purpose looking slide ruler). And I guess I was .01 or so outside the limit. Now they want me back to retest and I just want to know what this thing even covers. The procedure was they would start gradually sliding an object toward my eye then I would have to call out when it went blurry. So is .01 to far away or to close? Thanks!