Sim

It wasn't OK when CNN did it. It wasn't ok when PV did it. Can we agree to that? Now can we go back to tyranny discussion?

Let me expend a little... you make your own conclusion. Government mandates an entity to report ADR. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16689555/ https://www.congress.gov/106/crpt/hrpt977/CRPT-106hrpt977.pdf This entity is not doing reporting. Government makes it easier for an entity to report. https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html Government tries to use automation and better system to report. https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf To verify reports are not false, government requires... And then Project Veritas shown; Hospitals discourage its staff to report Hospital staff do not have time (or lazy) to do report that takes 30 - 60 minute. (no link provided) No conclusion provided.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16689555/

Deaths would be near zero if media and our government (sponsored by Big Pharma) didn't suppress things like zelenko protocol or other methods. But there is no money in that so here we are... our immune system is turned into a subscription service.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/over-12000-air-force-personnel-poised-not-to-meet-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-deadline_4059907.html

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/001-Complaint-101021.pdf One more lawsuit by those "anti-vaxer" scientists and doctors asking for "full transparency".

https://lc.org/PDFs/Attachments2PRsLAs/101521BidenDODVerifiedClassActionComplaintwithExhibits.pdf Another class action suite filed.

https://files.milarch.org/archbishop/abp-statement-on-covid19-vaccines-and-conscience-12oct2021.pdf

Applicable must read (or listen) to why government shouldn't be involved.

https://gab.com/a/posts/107075532123265514 So....according to Pfizer, Comirnaty is NOT available.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/07/joe-bidens-vaccine-mandate-doesnt-exist-its-just-a-press-release/

https://www.visir.is/g/20212167101d/stodva-notkun-boluefnis-moderna-her-a-landi-i-ljosi-nyrra-gagna "Safe and effective" - USAF

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.21262139v1

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7

https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/medical_certification/ Is there precedence for no fly after injection?

https://www.stripes.com/covid/2021-09-29/coronavirus-vaccine-military-mandate-lawsuit-service-members-3070322.html WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to: A. Find that the use of Pfizer-BNT COVID-19 vaccine for forcible inoculation of U.S. military members to be illegal until and unless the Secretary of Defense complies with his statutory requirements in requesting a waiver of informed consent and until the President makes the requisite finding under 10 U.S.C. §1107; and B. Find that all members of the Plaintiffs’ class that have survived infection with COVID-19 are still entitled to a medical exemption from vaccination even after the Defendants have complied with their legal obligations under the implementing DoDI 6200.02; If applicable, C. Find that the use of vaccines under an EUA is illegal until and unless all of the Defendants comply with their statutory obligations in requesting a waiver of informed consent under 10 U.S.C. §1107a and the implementing regulations and laws; D. Find that all members of the Plaintiffs’ class that have survived infection with COVID-19 are entitled to individual assessment to determine their eligibility for a medical exemption from vaccination even after the Defendants have complied with their legal obligations under DoDI 6200.02; Plaintiffs also ask this Honorable Court to: E. Find and declare that any order issued by DoD requiring the Plaintiffs to receive inoculation with COVID-19 vaccines are per se unlawful; F. Enjoin the DoD from vaccinating any service members until this action has completed and the status of any vaccine has been determined and the requirements for taking away Plaintiffs’ rights of informed consent have been met; and G. Award Plaintiffs their costs and attorneys’ fees and any other relief this Court may find appropriat covid_lawsuitamended.pdf

Interesting - to say the least. COVID-19-The-Spartacus-Letter.pdf

Abstract Aim: COVID-19 is currently the biggest threat to mankind. Recently, ivermectin (a US FDA-approved antiparasitic drug) has been explored as an anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent. Herein, we have studied the possible mechanism of action of ivermectin using in silico approaches. Materials & methods: Interaction of ivermectin against the key proteins involved in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis were investigated through molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation. Results: Ivermectin was found as a blocker of viral replicase, protease and human TMPRSS2, which could be the biophysical basis behind its antiviral efficiency. The antiviral action and ADMET profile of ivermectin was on par with the currently used anticorona drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir. Conclusion: Our study enlightens the candidature of ivermectin as an effective drug for treating COVID-19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/ But ....FDA says don't take it!

Cancer just means that it's working!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/no-evidence-u-s-air-force-pilots-resigned-rather-than-submit-to-the-jab/