tac airlifter

To confirm, you’re saying when the House report is released you bet there will be proof that Gaetz is a sex offender, which is a felony? You’re betting me alcohol that the house report will have evidence sufficient to uphold criminal charges of felony sex offense? I accept your terms. Let’s gamble.

The constitution doesn't give illegal immigrant pedophiles the right to swing their dong in front of my daughter in a bathroom while making it a hate crime for me to object. you know what, continue your absurd rhetoric. This obvious hysteria is what drove many liberals to abandon the democrat party. I support your TDS self-immolation, continue.

Got any proof? Because if DOJ could have nailed him on it I think they would have. its unfortunate after all we’ve seen recently that an accusation is enough to condemn someone.

Normally I’d agree, but these are exceptional circumstances. Think of his context: he’s been hounded by false accusations, literally had SES level players working with opposing campaigns to fabricate stories about him, his own generals illegally conspired behind his back to undermine his orders…. This has been a unique period on our history. He was given a decisive mandate for change by the American people, and knows from experience he cannot execute without a team committed to his vision. If you were a WG/CC leading a complete re-org under pressure of WW3 and given total hiring authority, would you rather have a team of SQ leaders you trusted to follow your intent or a team who had the normal pedigree but you knew their hearts weren’t onboard with your priorities? An imperfect analogy but it conveys my point. saying “loyalty is a key hiring criteria” plays into the dictator claims made against him, but I also see his perspective. If a boss asked for my loyalty, I’d say “loyalty to what?” The mission? The team? The ideas we took an oath to protect? Commanders intent? Or you personally even if you commit crimes? The first 4 are fine of course, the fifth definitely not. He’d be better served saying “trust” instead of “loyalty” but who am I to give advice? Bottom line I’m excited to see how it plays out and optimistic.

I don't know much about him either but this sounds ok.

Well, he's not a pussy and he hates feckless weak bureaucracy. Good in my book. What do you consider appropriate pedigree for the position?

Confirmed that the 3 US carriers operating into PAP all landed with small arms damage (Spirt, JetBlue & AAL). Time to load CLTs on the 73 and set up an orbit 🗡️

Interesting follow up to the story. I gotta tell you, Elon Musk taking over Twitter and restoring free speech is one of the greatest things to happen in my lifetime.

But they couldn't secure the nomination. He did. So your point is irrelevant.

I have no opinion on his motivations for mishandling classified documents, what kind of response were you expecting? I don’t know the man. And who said he’s a student of national defense? WTF are you talking about? Mishandling classified is a crime. That’s bad and I don’t support or condone it. However selective prosecution of crime is worse. A lot of what you guys simplistically label “whatabout-ism” is legitimate anger at double standards. If the law is the law and people who break it are punished (including Trump) then great! But democrats didn’t offer that, instead they offered lawfare against their political opponents, censoring free speech, men in womens sports, hate crimes for Christian’s praying outside abortion clinics and bail for looters burning police stations. Most of this nation saw it and rejected it.

Those articles are garbage. It asserts a truth (Trump deliberately delayed disaster aide to PR) without providing requisite evidence to convince the reader. An article that says something doesn’t make it true; haven’t you seen this same playbook enough times to recognize it? Give some critical thinking to the links you provided and try seeing them through the eyes of a skeptic; are they still the mic drop evidence you initially thought they were? You find me a Trump supporter on record ordering aid to avoid areas overtly favoring democrat politicians and I’ll say there’s equivalency, but neither link even comes close to that threshold.

No, he appears not to bear ill-will against those he competes with. It's strange to attempt deciphering his actions, but we've seen him shit talk Cruz, Vivek, DeSantis and others then turn around and work with them seemingly without any grudge. His turnabout regarding rhetoric on Kemp is noteworthy. He's tough to figure, best I can guess he doesn't take things personally if you seem useful. i think he won't use her because he doesn't need to, got burned by insiders last time & places her in the same category as Pence who wasn't a loyal ally. But to answer your question, I wouldn't trust her because she appears to place personal ambition over team cohesion and mission accomplishment. What do you like about her?

I hope that happens, and I think any GO is senior. I have some names to suggest if he's looking. And Miley should be pulled from retirement just to get demoted.

It's anomalous in national politics, and definitely bears exploring. The only thing known for certain: it can't be fraud. Biden was the most popular POTUS in our history and the election process is airtight.