12xu2a3x3

The news slows, people forget, the shares crash, hopes are dashed.

9 mike no tone

i had the same thing happen to me, to reserve/select since i was already a WG, just had to have to insurance until the blue cross kicked in.

Standard assertion that: I looked and decided this merited its own thread, but mods please delete if this is not the consensus. I wanted some opinions on what an ANG unit's conversion back to manned from UAVs might look like. Does big Air Force see these units the same as it does manned units changing missions? That is to say, is a mission change such as this likely even if it's possible? How many UAV units are "future proofing" by sending their studs through full up UPT? Some initial limiting factors -change to the original manned aircraft bed down facilities that would prohibit the return of manned aircraft. -spin up of ops and mx personal given projected future shortages on the ad side -original issues that lead to loss of manned mission remain, e.g. range too distant It seems like this kind of mission change would probably be less dependent on these factors and more on: -future demand for UAV assets -future procurement of F-35, A-X, LAAR, or similar -local political advocacy looking forward to your thoughts

i heard the same thing

with the magic of MICAP and scrounge it still get's done

i'll marshall jets or drive bread truck, but i really hope a detailer never tells me "the super needs the the can jet FMC by the end of the day"

thanks for the great information. they tell me that i probably won't have much in the way of time as a casual but i'll believe that when i see it. as far as sitting at a desk for six months goes, i've been on the flightline for a long time waiting for a slice of nonner pie.

mods feel free to delete this if you feel it belongs in a more general topic or if i missed one that already exists. What is the policy for taking leave as a Lieutenant on casual status, awaiting a UPT class date? Is it any different because of AETC or training status? I ask because it was generally not approved when I was an enlisted MRA MX student back in 2011.

our unit was going to give one to an rotc cadet but he had a problem with his harness and the second go needed the d for a spare. the part of me that loves flying couldn't help but feel bad for him but the part that busted my ass to make that line could care less.

makes sense.

I'm ANG now and got picked up by AD, this trip to MEPS was after selection.

there's absolutely room for a simplified system: maybe a single page to which people could submit updates which would generate emails. then, one or two people to approve the update and maintain some basic archival information. part of me thinks that tracking down hiring contact info for units, the difficult to get ones in particular (NOLA), is an integral part of the experience.

same on the 107th FS. great unit, nice base, and well run board.

will do

yes, they will accept your package. they'll consider it as part of the selection criteria. you're line officer recruiter should have explained this to you. if you haven't started the process will a recruiter already, i would strongly suggest you start today.

talked to e & e about it: "we have to use the tester and not the "suck and blow" method (sic, sts) we usually do"

i'd be curious to know if the problem is with that particular LRU, the CRU-98 or with it's installation into a light grey.

This is more of a job for Alan ing Bishopman

i know as many frustrating NCOs/SNCOs as I do junior enlisted and officers.

no shit. rank, however, is no factor

flight medicine sent me to see a civilian for therapy, he pumped the breaks on that. i'm in the guard not the ad, maybe since i'm a civilian applicant as far as they're concerned, they sent me to a civilian doctor for follow on.

thanks all. even the doc who made the initial diagnosis felt good about it. in the hands of SG now. will it be an actual waiver?

fast turn on this question would be appreciated: I was diagnosed as 6-7 diopter prisms of exophoria (IIRC) while at flight medicine for my FC1. any guidance that I have been able to find specifies anything over 10 as disqualifying and requiring a workup, yet I was asked to get a workup done by a civilian. the civilian eye doctor used what he characterized as "more modern equipment" and put the measurement at 2-3 diopter prisms. my question is this: what is current requirement? how likely is this to be approved? should I get therapy to get my exophoria down to a more negligible amount? I'm going to get a second opinion to boslter my case.