fire4effect

Possible changes to the time honored seniority system? Whether good, bad or neither remains to be seen.

Let the collective paranoia begin. I'm waiting on the MODs to get a National Security Letter and we'll all be given up whosale. Dibs on the bottom bunk.

I expect some very nasty legal fights to come out of this. We'll find out just how far warrants and subpoenas will be able to reach into social media. Especially given the sheer scale of the scandal. On a related note these shenanigans are not all that new and the posting of stuff like this has been going on for at least the last 10 years. Mostly because people did dumb things like not deleting caches on MWR computers and not so shockingly they got posted on the internet. Some small scale punishments handed out at the local level nothing rivaling the current fecal fullisade. Hang on tight Convective SIGMET just issued.

Fair point. If you believe Director Comey encrypted I-Phones will be the downfall of Western Democracy. I will be interested to see how a military organization will be able in a legal sense fight a civilian behemoth called the internet.

I wonder if there has been a run on new computers at various Exchanges around the country as many have decided it's time to upgrade. With the old ones recycled with a sledge hammer.

Hopefully you'll have them better prepared by the time they bail for the airlines.

If airline civilian programs like the PSA programs mentioned become widely available to put someone in an airline seat in 6 years vs 11-12 years on the mil side then not much choice but to adjust fire to compete. Agree that while autonomous airliners are a long long way off that same technology coupled with the sheer expense of new military aircraft/weapons systems means fewer manned cockpits and a correspondingly smaller number of pilots produced by the military in general going forward.

"Wilson reports that the Air Force and Navy train a combined 2,000 new pilots per year at an ultimate cost of $10 million for a seasoned fighter pilot." Gen. Steven Wilson, Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force testifying before the House and Senate Armed Services committees last week.

I agree. The operative word is "yet" The dynamic has changed completely now from a few years ago because of wave of retirements and the ATP/1500 hour requirements. Eventually the military won't be able to produce enough to cover all of the demand and while that is obviously good for a mil pilot's marketability it doesn't solve the problem of a shortage. From the Airline CEO/stockholder perspective it not surprisingly can help keep overall wages down by having a cadre of pilots you "own" long term. This is where the unions will earn their keep.

The CFI route also pairs instructors who are barely beyond students themselves with brand new pilots. I know the military has FAIPS but it seems counter-intuitive. I'm also surprised that the airlines haven't gone whole hog into a grow your own ab-initio programs or something close like requiring a PPL/instrument with say a 4 year degree to apply. With dare I say it a long term training agreement or as the military calls it an ADSC. Of course different states have laws that may limit the overall length of a contract so a 10 year agreement for example might not be feasible. If I'm young aspiring pilot this may be the quickest cheapest (though it's all relative) way in the not so distant future to a major airline seniority number. I know the unions with the current rank and file pilots would have a fit. JetBlue was looking at it though I don't whether it came to fruition. Finally, while sub 1000 hour military pilots aren't necessarily flying planeloads of paying passengers (though planeloads of troops on C-17s is no small matter) they're no less in a position of responsibility. Had SHELL 77 gone down over a heavily urban area the repercussions would still be felt as much as those from Colgan today.

In fairness I've wondered the same thing. Unless they're planning to integrate them into operations in a novel way I'm not familiar with which is quite possible. Still hard to fathom. If anyone is inclined to enlighten me please pm and we can go .mil

Wellll. It takes a village sts. USAID, Department of Agriculture, State Dept., World Bank, Army Corp of Engineers, various UN entities etc. LOTs of players. I want to say the last I heard was a quote of 70 percent plus of Afghanistan's budget comes from foreign donations at least in the 2013 time frame. Including India as a small poke in the eye to Pakistan I'm sure. Army is as much about providing security for all those agencies to operate as anything. The footprint has not at all surprisingly shrunk significantly since I was last there. Unfortunately Nation Building entails working with the LNs over which there is very little control so you can only hope for maybe a 70 percent solution. I hate the thought of a large ground contingent but after what gains made in Iraq were nearly lost to ISIS for good hedging your bets against ISIS and the rest of their ilk is really the only option I can see for now. I really do understand how a 365 (and all the pre deployment BS) can wear you down especially if your primary skill set is aviation or otherwise far removed from the job your tasked with.

LMAO

Alright. I give. Please enlighten me.

Assuming this is directed at me (Un-scoreable SAT)? You got me LOL Admit it took me a little while to figure out what you were saying 0

In Iraq the biggest violators of GO1 were the GOs....usually during Thursday poker night. (here's my shocked face) The next day they're taking rank from an E-4 and E-5 for the same infraction

Especially given the age of the B-52 and the relatively small fleet of strategic bombers in the U.S inventory (Including the B-1s and B-2s) Obviously too early to say but a whole lot of different potential underlying issues that can be very expensive to fix

Condolences Tough losing such good friend. Did some Acro a few days ago in an old T-6. A good reminder why it's done in an area well away from the airport and why clearing turns are part of the SOP

Maybe let them rely only on fuel/oil from refineries/production in their own state. With no importation from or through evil red states. I know it's overly simplified but I would be very surprised with the amount of fuel consumed in California that they could meet their own needs.

Not sure if this was mentioned elsewhere. Hypocrisy, the one common denominator for all politicians.

OMG! This is how an engineer describes how he had sex the night before

Well played

I agree that a most things will stay the same. Lots of things are said in a campaign that have no chance of happening precisely because we do have robust checks and balances in the government. No mass deportations and I'm not a contracting officer so I can't say what is or isn't allowed in the AF1 case etc. But I still see some traditional boundaries tested by a very non traditional president. But point taken so now a little juvenile humor instead of big words.

Very much so but given what has happened in this country over the last several months not much would surprise me. Trump has just threatened Boeing with canceling the new Air Force One over cost. Can he? Good question. But as a very shrewd businessman he has absolutely no compunction with playing hardball.

Agree. It falls under the heading of "serious misallocation of valuable military resources" Break And if the DOD wants to REALLY get a recalcitrant (my ACT word for the day) pilot's attention they set up a process where they can get the FAA to suspend the Airman Certificate of anyone who faces a FEB or UCMJ action. Not sure if it would need a separate Congressional Action to make it happen though it would be hard to say if a Republican Congress would actually go along with it anyway. As everyone who holds a certificate knows it's considered a "privilege"