AC&W

https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2452910/space-force-personnel-to-be-called-guardians/

Not bad for a sub $100 watch, nice find.

Swatch Moonswatch, mission to the moon, is a genuine, affordable replica of one of the most iconic aviation watches. Seiko, Sports 5 GMT, is likely the most affordable, quality automatic GMT movement on the market. I recently saw one at the BX so you can probably find it tax free. Casio is always an excellent choice, particularly if a model catches your eye. Citizen is an excellent choice above Casio. Both brands have some great options that offer a combined digital/analog face with solar charging and radio freq time synch. My must have in a watch for work is a date and GMT function, and I prefer automatic/mechanical movements. I have never used the E6B on a watch I own, however if that's your thing it can be a cool feature.

Biff's soccer commentary is clear and concise. Just the right amount to stay engaged without too much commitment.

Speaking for the MAF...as long as MAF pilots expect centralised flight management, but are unwilling to staff flight management duties with pilots, or unwilling to direct flight management standards, then continue to expect current excellence in planning products. Centralised flight management makes sense for inter theater assets/missions, less so for intra theater missions. AFGSC is worse than the MAF, but current GEO & Functional CCMDs nuances don't always play well with each other.

Until the KC-46 came on board. Unfortunately, government contracting and Boeing QA fails the platform in other areas beyond the director lights.

Do you recall the airspeed by any chance? Curious if toboggan was required. Also looking at some photos, with the probe and external fuel lines it gave an appearance of a snorkel and goggles. Do you know if the AAR equipment was configurable, could it be added or removed per mission? Again, the external appearance hints that it could potentially be a straight forward configuration swap.

CCDR reports to SECDEF, Service Chief reports to Service Security. In most cases, probably safe to assume the higher on the food chain has more influence to throw around, which appears to have happened here.

These problems are not unique to airline pilots. What is unique are unionized jobs that can earn six figures working part time.

Did the manifesto shed any light on the decor? Haha.

Opportunity is limited to Airmen with requisite skills in IT and cyber. More likely facing the economy of losing IT & cyber talent to the free market than embracing specialization. Bombs Away LeMay axed the WO program due to change in public law establishing the SNCO corps. "The approval was also economical, using E-8 and E-9s to fill superintendent positions was significantly less expensive than utilizing warrant officers to perform similar duties, the introduction did not Eliminate WOs, just their procurement." https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/3735263/flashback-return-of-the-in-betweener/

Optics. The USSF is trying hard to establish a cultural identity. The press on, "the first" nearly anything in the military is what really excites the ambitious. Influence from high enough in the food chain can get anybody into a training program. No spear at the particular individual in this case, well earned and timing was in his favor.

Reader beware, the article promotes thought crime. Back when people used to bootleg their music albums from the radio, and read newspapers, I still remember the first time I discovered NPR and being fascinated by listening to something other than pop songs and car salesmen...I mean car dealer advertising.

The rabbit hole went pretty far, lol.

And as the world turns, one crashed two days ago. https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/ilyushin-russian-military-aircraft-crash-ivanovo