VMFA187

CEO Bourla says Pfizer vaccines offer limited protection 'if any' and even less against infection (opindia.com) Pfizer CEO once said their shots were "100% effective." Now he just said that two shots "offer very limited, if any protection against Covid-19." This is what happens when a vaccine isn't properly vetted. "Trust the science." Laughable.

Obese people cause higher rates in general because others have to subsidize the, often, poorer segment of society who make up a larger portion of the obese. At age 65 the rate at which someone causes a motor vehicle accident begins to increase significantly. Should we take away all drivers licenses for people when they turn 65?

That's a capital "M" to you. 😆

Fairly sure no one thinks that. Everyone knows that words can have consequences.

You're wrong - Find me one person on here who is black and white about the vaccine who is conservative - That is only on the left. I guarantee you anyone who is against the vaccine personally doesn't care if others want to take it. That's the difference. We want you to be able to make a personal decision because this vaccine is anything but proven. You and everyone on the left want everyone to be forced to take it regardless of their own individual research and responsibility.

Here is my question, maybe it is a year early... But how do we hold those accountable who made this a farce?

The annual mortality of people over 70 is > 4%. Without whatever you want to add for covid. For your SA. That "balance" should have ended long ago. Having the White House tell its citizens they and their families are facing death is far from that when we all know better.

Every MD in California was sent a notification that stated they could lose their certification by the California Medical Board stating that they would potentially lose their license if they provided documentation for any waiver for the vaccine that was outside of the realm of "a demonstrated allergic reaction to ingredients in the vaccine." Several studies have shown, for specific segments of the population, the risks outweigh the benefits. For those who have epilepsy, 4% who received a vaccine experienced more frequent or more severe seizure activity. If you were in that population would you think you should be granted a medical exemption? Legitimate question.

They can't - The far left take his word as gospel and only the far left continue to feel that Biden is doing a satisfactory job. If this administration fired him they would lose their most ardent supporters while gaining very little from the rest of the population who feel that this administration is failing. Who would have bought into that slogan? I know a fair amount of people and only one has been hospitalized from covid - I wouldn't be willing to "social distance for a few years" from what I've seen. With that said, I know that some here have experienced loss and for that I do sympathize. But I would not and will not give up years of my life to provide a larger margin of safety for those who have already chosen to condemn themselves by way of their years of poor decision-making as it relates to diet and healthy lifestyles. They made their bed, they can sleep in it. Don't expect others to subsidize your poor past decisions.

Press Briefing by White House COVID-19 Response Team and Public Health Officials | The White House "We are intent on not letting Omicron disrupt work and school for the vaccinated. You’ve done the right thing, and we will get through this. For the unvaccinated, you’re looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families, and the hospitals you may soon overwhelm."

Hey Pawnman and everyone else, look! You can get "super immunity" if you are fully vaccinated AND get covid after! COVID vaccination and previous infection may deliver 'super immunity' (usatoday.com) Wonder if uber leftists are going to throw covid parties after they are fully vaccinated so they can catch covid and then claim their moral superiority through their super immunity. 😆

Finished it on the ride to work this morning. @pawnman, riding doesn't = flying.

Says a dude on who has never flown a military aircraft posting on a military aviation site. 😆

Hear and read what you want. Don't think this decision doesn't weigh heavily on my mind. I'm not the only one in this position.

I hope you one day have to face a choice between ensuring your family is taken care of or jeopardizing them for something you feel is right.

That people are trying to get a booster before they are even eligible for it, yes.

Great, that should be a choice that they themselves are able to make for an illness that has a mortality rate that is incredibly low for a relatively healthy individual when the alternative is a vaccine that doesn't function like a vaccine, and has absolutely no long-term known side effects, and that skipped many of the normal vaccine testing requirements to receive authorization.

Well, I was coerced into receiving the JJ vaccine on Thursday around 2pm. I woke up 10 hours later and felt like absolute garbage, as bad as when I had covid two months ago - Fever, worst muscle soreness I've ever experienced (truthfully), headache, and joint pain. Lasted until a few hours ago. Can't wait to see what long term side effects will be revealed in the coming years... At least I'll have about a year head's up on most of the willing test volunteers. Of note, there were people in there who were a week from even being eligible for a booster asking if they could get it early. Astounding.

The Maxwell Trial Tracker on on Twitter was just suspended.

I hope your lead brought you in for a straight in to ILS or PAR... If it warrants a legit section penetration to section landing it warrants an emergency declaration. If he's leading a hurt bird on a Hi-TCN triple arcing procedure then he's AFU. Tell your flight leads to suck less.

Call them effective if you want, but they're not required for a vast majority of the population and their use puts that majority at risk for other factors they wouldn't have to face if not being coerced to take a "vaccine" that they don't need. There are a lot of other "effective tools in the quiver" but no one is pushing those - Why?

Why was the definition just changed? Isn't that odd? Are you cool with changing the definitions of words just to fit a certain viewpoints narrative? Seems you are and that it's just "semantics."

Except its not, at least the way Webster's dictionary defined the word "vaccine" until a week or so ago. I guess its a valid to change the definitions of words so they meet your intent. The left has been doing it for years for social justice, why not this?

Only scared libs are even wearing masks anymore in San Diego. Of course they are also wearing them in their car, alone...

Got it. Thanks dude.