VMFA187

Transition crews are traditionally considerably slower to develop than guys tracking straight into the platform or from another fighter.

Thanks Sir. I'll be sure to provide you with an update.

Ever had a plate of lightly toasted crayons dipped in ranch dressing? Don't knock it until you try it.

Capable of combat or combat proficient? If it is the latter, is that not warranted? If it's the former, why were they there in the first place?

They have them at Kingsville and Meridian for the T-45. We had two in VT-21 when I was there 2010-2011.

The most difficult time I have had in my career over the last decade as a Fighter Pilot and Marine was when I was an airframes OIC with 35 Marines and 10 airframes while simultaneously going through my 4-ship flight lead upgrade. Two points: 1) While that approach would certainly result in better leader development at every level, it is incredibly taxing on those put into those positions. 2) Due to having to balance both duties, much like a multi-role fighter, it is nearly impossible to truly excel at either without jeopardizing the other. What happens is you become average at both, detailed many times by my experience operating with Air Force F-15 and F-16 units where their capacity in the air was developed to a higher degree than ours was. Though I suppose some of that may be attributed to our 6-7 flight hours a month...

I'm curious if those high, low, and averages for hours include the multiplier. If not, there are a lot of fighter guys in the Navy/USMC who are going to be waiting quite some time to hit 1,508.

Why don't you guys come down to Miramar? We have plenty of ramp space...

Did you conduct a Skype interview?

This, so many times over.

EFB = Electronic Flight Bag? When we went East we were issued tablets from our Intel shop every morning prior to the brief, and they had 1) All of our aircraft pubs, 2) all the pertinent nav stuff, and 3) Killswitch. 1) When you're 1,000 miles from home and your duty office on the radio, and have an issue, it's nice to be able to really delve into the issue. 2) In a tight cockpit that's full of water, food, and other miscellaneous gear that you hope to not have to use, it's awesome saving space. 3) Game changer. The ability to record 9-lines, plot, conduct talk-ons, and correlate on a device the size of a kneeboard vice having pages and pages of maps and notes... I cannot speak highly enough about how much of a force multiplier in the cockpit possessing a tablet is. And then we get back home and they're taken away. Standard.

I've been told I'm being considered for an ART position in an airframe I would enjoy - Is the discussion about buyback and 5 years of service as an ART still accurate for retirement? Seems like a great way to balance retirement and getting a line number with the airlines after I'll have 11 years of active service and 5 years as an ART if so.

We can unplug the hose from the connector which goes into the OBOGS system that is located near our left hip. So essentially you're flying with the exact same equipment, not attached to the system, breathing ambient air through your mask and hose. The T-45 is pressurized, but I don't believe it schedules the same as the Hornet. It's been six years, but someone around the squadron said 15,000' MSL equates to around 10,000' Cabin Altitude. Not sure anymore how accurate that is.

From this side of the house, the common feeling is that it is a combination of both. Older equipment failing at a more rapid rate, as well as an issue that is at the forefront of everyone's minds makes it more likely to be reported. The below sounds interesting... ""After briefings and discussions with our aircrew, their training wing leadership, the engineers, and aeromedical experts, we have identified a way forward to resume flight operations safely by limiting the maximum cabin altitude to below 10,000 feet in order be able to operate without using the OBOGS system," Shoemaker explained." Should work out well for BFM. The deck, is the deck.

I have as much, if not more, respect for our ground guys than most. We have to spend six months training to be rifle platoon commanders before we transition to our individual MOS - Many of my friends are infantry officers. Where did you think I was taking sole credit? I simply stated a fact. No one believes they are out there winning by themselves. Relax dude.

Kiloalpha hit 1-3, so I'll address 4-6, 7 doesn't warrant a response. And in truth, none of these points do, but I'm standing duty while our planes are out so I have some time to entertain this. 4 - Special Forces are Army only. I assume you mean "Special Operations Forces"? Yes, self preservation tends to take over when your life and fellow Marines/Sailors/Airmen/Soldiers lives are at stake. That being said, the "exercises" you participated in, doesn't sounds like incredibly adequate training for those of America's 21st century warrior class. And I am by no means an incredibly motivated service member, I simply see the value in all of our uniformed members experiencing training that reminds of what we can face. 5 - You have no idea what type of leader I am. To be perfectly honest, I'd prefer to only lead in a brief, debrief, and my 4-ship airborne. I have no desire for any other leadership opportunities. 6 - Ok? This isn't even worth entertaining. Deployments working 9-5? Was that your experience? Regardless, have you led other aircraft >1,000 miles from where your squadron is based, logged 8 hours in a single seat fighter aircraft, and prosecuted terrorist targets? Several on this board have, and it's asinine to think that you know what people have, or have not, done.

The Air Force is a war fighting organization. Combat, regardless of whether hand-to-hand, or from the cockpit of a single seat fighter, is a physical endeavor. If all the members of an organization don't have some basis of that, then you're not going to be an effective, cohesive, organization able to deal in war.

In a local San Diego paper - F/A-18 pilots first... Drink the f****in' man.

Say what you will, that was likely the most entertaining post I've read here.

The Royal Australian Air Force does that; you have an option to take the command track, or stay in Never Never Land where you never grow up and stay a pilot forever.

And that is why I really bring my iPhone. We were issued "burner phones" by our Flight Equipment Marines on every sortie we launched on for this purpose.

That's more along the lines of what I expected and what Hornet guys do. More if you have to divert than anything else.

Those images have to be unrelated to the event, or at least staged after? The 'chute appears somewhat convincing, but I have a hard time believing a guy who just got out of a jet is going to dump his flight gear and take a few photos. Even more unconvincing, he's is using a radio in CONUS and not his personal phone.

Duck, you can be my wingman any day.

So that is what is going to likely happen to me, because I didn't do USMC PME, which is a two year program. Does anyone know how Guard units look at that stuff? If it's any help, I have a Master's Degree and will be complete with AF PME - Squadron Officer School, in less than a week.