Day Man
-
Posts
1,770 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
47
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by Day Man
-
Seems like they have enough video to press charges...hopefully as adults for attempted murder
-
if people are voting based on ethnicity, they deserve what they get
-
Maybe sit the next one out, Fud...
-
Helms says "F this, I'm out!"
-
That's offensive...how could you possibly do your job with that on?
-
if it's not documented in your medical records, they won't ever know.
-
Great Goldeneye (and history probably) reference
-
sounds awesome! what kind of bike will you be on? good luck man!
-
I LOL'd
-
Some sleuthing led to me find that it was also in the 475th Fighter Group, predecessor to the 53d WEG currently at Eglin.
-
Has the denial of sexually-themed material been proven to decrease sexual-assaults? Based on Catholic priests and bible-belt teen moms, I would argue the opposite... Edit: I don't think anyone disagrees with you here.
-
Jesus. to Luc
-
sweet...thanks. turns out I am a ra-tard.
-
This is what I see...the "reputation" is visible because I was hovering over it.
-
anyway we can get the names displayed again of who up/downvoted something? it saved the bandwidth of adding just a "2" reply, and gave some SA on other guys opinions/positions...
-
Atheist here...a bro had something come up so I took over Chrismahanukwanzaka party planning. Took it as an opportunity to make the party as fun as possible and ignore any religious overtones. I'm pretty sure it was a good time...
-
Good work man... appreciate the effort.
-
read my SIB/FEB thread...
-
Investment showdown -- beyond the Roth, SDP, & TSP
Day Man replied to Swizzle's topic in Squadron Bar
Low risk/low reward -
Still pisses me off they put a picture of Sitka 43 ~2 seconds from impact on the cover. And 2 on everything said about lawyering-up/not saying anything to anyone.
-
Not privileged, used in the CDI & FEB. Agree with the bolded part...one of their super important CDI questions was "why we weren't wearing our deployed sq patch"...their intent was obvious.
-
False.
-
Perfect! Out of curiosity, what configuration does the Erroneous ALS/Stall Warnings (Nose Damage) checklist recommend? (Hint: it's not 8 degrees of flaps) No way man...like I said before I'm lucky to be here. In fact, I'm glad the AF showed me what they really think relatively early in my career. When I needed guidance, my leadership was nowhere to be found. Both my WG/CC and SQ/CC told me they were hopeful for the final outcome and I was instructed to be "ready to fly" when the decision came down. 2 years later they both signed off on my referral OPR.
-
No thrust from 1 & 4. There ended up being some damage to the cores from over-temping. We initially thought they were back online when all engine tapes looked good, but that was apparently just from windmilling. No idea about the same treatment. They said we landed in the wrong configuration, but no one still has told me the right configuration.
