Sua Sponte

You think Afghanistan was a “daddy thing” with Bush Jr? Not Iraq?

There has always been a problem with some flying commanders who have never been A-Codes, due to being Navs and ABMs, second guessing and placing unrealistic expectations on those who have been A-Codes.

Here’s the audio.

Me on the Internet - “I wonder if Lindsey “Lady G” Graham wears his girl wig when he’s being bottomed?” Me - “What happened to my Internet?” Random Dude - “Oh, the DOJ threatened your Internet provider with criminal indictments if they didn’t stop your Internet access because of what you said about a member of Congress.”

Has the government threatened Big Tech with criminal proceedings if they don’t comply with their flagging?

Sweet, I await to read your brief on the lawsuit you’re going to file against the Feds for this atrocious overreach and First Amendment violation.

So, are they flagging them when they’re working or in their off time? Political officials can block critics, who are their constituents, on their personal social media, and it’s not a First Amendment violation. https://apnews.com/article/d314927f2b131fa285df4221448fd4ff If it’s a public platform, that’s paid for by tax dollars, I agree. If it’s a private platform, they can do what they want. Despite what you want to believe, Big Tech is fully within their right to tell the Feds to fuck off.

Is the town square owned by the Government or Facebook/Twitter?

Apparently you are this stupid. You take a quote from one of the most batshit crazy people in the Senate who’s trying to rile up her base. It’s never going to be allow for the government to directly control through a private company freedom of speech. That’s SCOTUS case someone posted above held that in the opinion. She can say, and try, to pass as much legislation as she wants and it’ll be legally challenged in the SCOTUS.

Of course you’re not talking about or defending the legal team, because you know what they did was wrong….now. The general consensus here was a different tune a few months ago. You can’t get past the fact it’s not a First Amendment violation because the government isn’t directly doing the censoring. And yes, big tech tells the government to fuck off because they have the money and legal resources to do so. Guess what? Don’t like it? Fucking leave the platform, that’s your at will right.

Yeah, Trump just had the DOJ via lapdog Barr secretly subpoena his enemies data, including his own attorney. That’s not insane at all. https://apnews.com/article/1252749aa9ad526cc01d633949bd9b5a

We get it war hawk, America is being eroded. Better buy that ranch in Wyoming and to surround yourself with your conservative Boomer friends.

I don’t really read your echo chamber comments. I’m honestly surprised you don’t just post a meme without any rebuttal.

The “law team” was spewing bullshit of rampant voter fraud through the media despite little to no evidence, which caused them to lose every lawsuit they filed. Said lawsuits were filed in bad faith based on their “free speech,” and are now facing some very serious professional implications because of their “free speech” isn’t so protected. The irony is the fact that a good majority of you are in the military, the one organization that can severely suppress free speech.

Standard Is someone refusing to bake a cake because they’re being discriminatory over a protected class or someone or is someone just refusing to bake a cake due to it violating their own protected class? The SCOTUS didn’t take a broad interpretation in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission for good reason.

Where did the government say they were going to levy legal action against the tech giants if they didn’t “censor” free speech?

Yeah, cause tech companies give a fuck what the Feds want all the time. It’s also not censoring when you’re free to go to another platform and say whatever you want. You know, for the six minutes you guys were on Parler and learned that the tech giants also own all the major cloud hosting services. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/07/fbi-and-apple-are-poised-for-another-privacy-disagreement.html

The government isn’t deciding, the owners of the social media platforms are. Also, the First Amendment does not protect against knowingly false statement of fact. If that was the case, then explain why the Kraken Legal Team facing possible sanctions up to disbarment for their inherently bad faith voter fraud lawsuits.

By silence you mean telling social media platforms to cutdown on misinformation? It’s not a First Amendment violation since it’s up to the social media platforms to either delete it or not, the government isn’t disposing directly. Suggest you chicken littles focus on the 2024 election. If social media platforms are unfairly targeting conservatives saying they’re the root cause of misinformation, then why are Ted Cruz, Ben Shapiro, Lauren Boebert, and that CrossFit Nazi from Georgia’s accounts not deleted?

1. Wasn’t the “laptop story” coming from someone who was recently had their law license suspended in two separate jurisdictions? Hmmm. 2. Who gets to decide what’s said their platform? The owner of said platform. Don’t like it? You’re free to make your own. 3. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/07/15/georgias-raffensperger-calls-firing-fulton-election-officials/7983338002/ “Three separate audits of Georgia's 2020 election results found no evidence of widespread voter fraud.” 4. https://apnews.com/article/f0c36df59ee1069d65aa6a70a22d88cc “CLAIM: Arizona’s largest county in the 2020 election received and counted 74,000 mail-in ballots that had no record of ever being sent out to voters. THE FACTS: False. The claim mischaracterizes reports that are intended to help political parties track early voters for their get-out-the-vote efforts, not tally mail-in ballots through Election Day. The reports don’t represent all mail-in ballots sent out and received, so the numbers aren’t expected to match up, according to Maricopa County officials and outside experts. “We have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent,” Logan said at a meeting livestreamed at Arizona’s Capitol on Thursday. “That could be something where documentation wasn’t done right. There’s a clerical issue. There’s not proper things there, but I think when we’ve got 74,000, it merits knocking on a door and validating some of this information.” Logan based his false claim on two types of early voting reports issued by Maricopa County: EV32 files and EV33 files. He claimed that EV32 files are “supposed to give a record of when a mail-in ballot is sent” and EV33 files are “supposed to give a record of when the mail-in ballot is received.” That’s not accurate, according to Maricopa County officials, who tweeted on Friday that “the EV32 Returns & EV33 files are not the proper files to refer to for a complete accumulating of all early ballots sent and received.” Instead, the EV32 and EV33 files are reports created for political parties to aid them in their get-out-the-vote efforts during early voting, according to Tammy Patrick, a senior adviser at the Democracy Fund and a former Maricopa County elections official. Arizona law requires county recorders to provide this data to political parties and candidates, Patrick said.” 6. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/04/gasoline-prices-gop-biden-497947 “It’s an old tactic employed by opposition parties to blame sitting presidents when fuel prices rise on their watch — and one that Republicans unsuccessfully tried to wield against Barack Obama during a recovering economy a decade ago. This time, they are pointing to Biden's ambitious climate change plans, his pause on leases for new oil wells on federal lands, and his cancellation of the permits for the Keystone XL pipeline as the culprits, although none of those steps have had any immediate impact on what motorists pay at the pump. Experts largely agree that the White House usually has little to do with short-term moves in gasoline prices, which are a factor of global oil prices, U.S. refinery operations, and — especially this year — a sharp jump in demand from drivers as people emerge from lockdowns and travel resumes.“

Ask him what UPT base he washed out of?

Looks like it’s going well for his voting fraud legal team. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-kraken-lawsuits-julia-haller-b1882776.html

If he was a Marxist, he wouldn’t be talking making a wage.