SurelySerious
-
Posts
2,638 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
44
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by SurelySerious
-
Putin
-
Just picturing Jeremy Clarkson in a Lotus dodging a Brit Apache.
-
Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP - The Bonus)
SurelySerious replied to Toro's topic in General Discussion
Maybe they’ll move from snail mail to IE11 soon like UTAPS and AROWS. Only the most advanced. -
An actual active, place changing race across the board, finally.
-
You don’t have passion, you’re just upset you don’t have a case. My position: just because Putin thinks something doesn’t mean the world has to take it as an acceptable view, whereas you keep advocating that because he views it that way it’s ok.
-
You picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue. What you’re doing is putting (crazy ass) words in the mouth of anyone who doesn’t hold the same view as you, which is an incredibly emotionally immature argument technique. Edit: and also yeah, when people have said that Putin’s view isn’t an acceptable reason to invade, you have 100% been an apologist for why he has.
-
Making more things up that I never said, nice strategy for rational discussion. Take a TO.
-
Yeah, you’re the one making up conspiracy bs. Maybe sit this one out Donald.
-
The man is 70. He was around. And yes, you’ve been so busy for the last 6-9 pages trying to justify validating Putin’s feelings that you’re not recognizing that the world doesn’t have to accept it. Factually.
-
Says emotionally attached guy.
-
No, I’m saying that the narrative built by one megalomaniac doesn’t have to be accepted by the rest of the international community. Where the are you coming up with all the rest of these mental gymnastics to justify his “rationale”?
-
I’m being the opposite of emotional. You’re the one validating his argument.
-
The rest of the world doesn’t have to accept his narrative that backs his maniacal plan. Quit giving in to his bs.
-
You’re done not being able to back your opinions, copy.
-
Bro, some opinion pieces aren’t solid evidence for why we should believe that Putin’s persona is justified for seeing every country around him as a threat.
-
Or, hear me out here, YOUR opinions are based on a similarly perilous theory.
-
Nah bro, I never said only war is a solution to this but keep trying to build paper tigers to fight.
-
Actually, he has consistently been arguing that we must accept Putin’s viewpoint as valid, or maybe you haven’t been reading it closely.
-
It doesn’t mean it’s a sentiment we have to validate as acceptable in the world forum. That’s the part that YOU don’t get.
-
Orrrrrr does Putin just paint it that way on the world stage. No question he wants the glory of the soviet union but is it actually a threat or does he just say it to give himself a pretext.
-
Except that what you said is that an alliance implies violence, which is patently false. Are you following your own arguments?
-
The government of a sovereign nation is the people’s contracted arbiter of political violence; an alliance to further the interests of a nation imply no more violence than the existence of the sovereign government that carries out political violence for its people. Ukraine isn’t out to invade or encroach upon Russia, even if it signs a defence pact.
-
Belarus positioning itself to be a forward deploy location for Russian nukes, per wsj article. Fun times!
-
2
-
Sounds legit.
