Jump to content

SurelySerious

Supreme User
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,905

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SurelySerious

  1. SurelySerious

    F1 Thread

    SurelySerious replied to N730's topic in Squadron Bar

    Hamilton’s skid plate was a half millimeter short. Ouch. Gasly DQ, too, from what I read.
  2. SurelySerious
    If 90% of the fleet never gets off the ground from CONUS, China can’t shoot them down. It’s a feature.
  3. SurelySerious
    1) Offer up something for divestment that’s already slated for divestment 2) ?? 3) profit I’m for it.
  4. SurelySerious
    Don’t give them ideas
  5. SurelySerious
    Some funny damage control. Probably just a fake news SecDef memo.
  6. SurelySerious
    You did not address it, but agree, next topic since your writing was nsplayer boring.
  7. SurelySerious
    Yeah, your post(s) was entirely ignoring the ethics and just whitewashing it with fluff because apparently you’re so enamored with DJT that you’re ok with it, or you don’t have the knowledge/capability to recognize it. Either way, you wrote a lot of words with no substance.
  8. SurelySerious
    Good to see ethics isn’t your strong suit, but writing volumes off topic like nsplayer is. Glad someone is continuing the trend.
  9. SurelySerious
    SEC went 8-6 in round one, which is about right for admitting the 90% of the conference. Turns out half the conference is above average.
  10. SurelySerious
    This has to be the way forward with rapid innovation. Making one really good platform and resting on our laurels only works under certain geopolitical situations. In the realm of F aircraft: As awesome as Raptor is, thinking it will be the only high end fighter we need for 30+ years was a weakness, especially after the Gates debacle.
  11. SurelySerious
    You’re ignoring the quid pro quo, but go on believing in your cult. Also, Twitter is the vehicle, not the source. That’s how I can tell you’re just Trump fan-boying. The source is that left wing rag the Wall Street Journal…oh wait
  12. SurelySerious
  13. SurelySerious
    I’m not even sure Kamala, Queen of Word Salads, could have come up with 90 seconds that incoherent.
  14. SurelySerious
    Extorted into pro bono work. You should really read what happened before you support dear leader.
  15. SurelySerious
    The specific assertion was that it was idle. I don’t have the manual around for a CRJ, do you? No shit it’s a low rpm.
  16. SurelySerious
    Ya think?
  17. SurelySerious
    Extortion. That’s the word you’re looking for. Quid pro quo, also applies. Quit acting like Trump’s behavior is above board. Edit to add: twitter and tmz are the only appropriate news sources for this reality show he’s running to pad his portfolio.
  18. SurelySerious
    Target firm you disagree with using EO, retract EO after firm agrees to do free work for you. There’s at least one word for that kind of behavior…
  19. SurelySerious
  20. SurelySerious
    YGBFSM. But this time it definitely won’t burn!
  21. SurelySerious
    Potentially flight idle; I don’t know what 43% N1 in a CRJ is, honestly.
  22. SurelySerious
    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/us/politics/musk-pentagon-briefing-china-war-plan.html What could go wrong?
  23. SurelySerious
    Peformance increasing shear 15 seconds before touchdown, power came back a ton, never went back in and ~1000 fpm from that time until impact. 15 seconds is a long time to not direct a go around or take the aircraft if parameters aren’t what you would expect. https://avherald.com/h?article=52439b47&opt=0
  24. SurelySerious
    Unexpected crossover.
  25. SurelySerious
×
×
  • Create New...