SurelySerious
-
Posts
2,634 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
43
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by SurelySerious
-
They take training to make sure the network drives are organized and official things saved in the correct structure for federal law accountability purposes. It is super qweepy, had to deal with that on a deployment 6-9 years ago. When your network drive folders are organized with the numbers and the one where everyone actually saves there working docs is totally separate? Usually why.
-
Slash all of the brown ranks. They’re indistinguishable.
-
Standby for your HAF mandated down day to “address” suicides. I’m waiting for the part where they ask our airmen what’s wrong, then dismiss all the things brought up as whining/complaining. Sounds just like the pilot retention task force. Therefore, my only conclusion is they don’t actually give a shit about any of their people and will just produce more airmen to replace the ones they lose from the big air force perspective. But the appearance of having done something has been accomplished.
-
Make it?
-
Cons: nuclear. Global Strike shenanigans.
-
Did you rent a bo-at?
-
I was on my last free article, so it said a few days ago. From what I recall TLDR version: all Dems have to do is nominate a decent human being who can work with possibly Dem controlled House and Senate, but they’re convincing themselves that the only path is a person so radical the country won’t elect them. Trump wins again.
-
If only there was a function whereby you could query the website...https://www.flyingsquadron.com/forums/search/?q="Short tour"&updated_after=any&sortby=relevancy&search_and_or=or And THEN, a whole discussion solely based on the topic you desire to learn about. https://www.flyingsquadron.com/forums/topic/15974-short-tour-info/
-
When you load up the tapes, you just have to plug this in first.
-
And the empire is significant.
-
What? We don’t have one, everything is just great.
-
Along the lines of Lawman’s thoughts: -Before you strike you have to hold the upper hand on the public narrative, and right now we simply do not in the international eye -They have proxy forces and military elements that don’t play normal rules that will be in play; they’re not as weak as Iraq during NW/SW -If your long term goal is the fall of the regime, you could very easily strengthen the gov’ts standing amongst the people via common enemy by attacking There are a lot of things the US administration may actually be considering on this one. The Iranians probably want us to attack because it benefits them in many ways...so maybe you wait it out until they mess up very obviously on the international stage. Or not, I’m just a dude.
-
Nice work improving Base Ops.
-
I did, because he’s in the wrong thread and clearly didn’t UTFSF. Your chaff is more harmful to Base Ops.
-
Doesn’t your airplane have to be there to get the tax free?
-
Commanders are dropping like flies this year
SurelySerious replied to MDDieselPilot's topic in General Discussion
That’s it? Please tell me you have something better. -
Commanders are dropping like flies this year
SurelySerious replied to MDDieselPilot's topic in General Discussion
Tale of the tape says...that’s a lie. You make up crazy shit for a while, then one of your 8 personalities can’t handle that other people aren’t as smart as you and that they could possibly disagree, and you go berserk and post an incoherent profanity laden rant. Wait a few months, come back because you care so little about internet opinions, repeat. -
Could be whatever it wants to identify as today!
-
Checks. It’s not a can-it-go-secure problem, it’s that if you go secure and click anything on the site, it points you to non-secure.
-
If you’re trying to replace F-15s with F-35, then I would think so.
-
Not claiming to be an expert in something based on an undergraduate degree and watching it once or twice, then lording that experience over others. Cool story, though, Hansel.
-
No, because you fraudulently claimed expertise.
-
The difference is you misrepresented yourself as an expert. In other words, a fraud.
-
Nah, but good try. You’re like a UPT student claiming to be an expert in Air Force aviation. Spelling voir dire doesn’t make you special; set foot in the court room for real before you put people down.
-
I haven’t, but I recognize an overinflated self importance based on surface level knowledge when I see it. Let me know when you’ve passed the bar and actually argued something in a criminal court, I’ll take your boasting more seriously.
