SurelySerious

And the world looks just the same And history ain't changed

Happens.

Free Thought Under Siege Could be the Air Force, frankly.

Go back and read; the original advice you're looking for is waiting to be provided if you want it. The OPR/PRF bs was a byproduct of a completely different branch of the discussion that you bit off on. Beerman Step 1: what do you want?

My personal favorite is still the Air Force Birthday chow hall menu from an undisclosed location with the J-10.

John Kennedy, conservative for US Senate...in a commercial on how powerful the US military is. Nice work.

If looking for some reading recommendations and haven't seen it, Mattis has a few words on the matter: https://www.businessinsider.com/viral-james-mattis-email-reading-marines-2013-5

What was the points system?

Or any other AFI/pubs change, to include ones that would improve mission effectiveness or safety procedures. You know, the things we do when we fly, in the Air Force. Priorities.

I'm sure there are many, but on a recent out-the-door-to-deployment speech, his message was roughly: "Don't f this up, my reputation depends on it." How did you get 4 stars? Oh, wait, apparently that CYA mentality is how. A far cry from a Patton ("You don't win by dying for your country, you do it by making the other poor bastard die for his" stuff) or Eisenhower ("I have full confidence in your courage, devotion to duty, and skill in battle" stuff) in the leadership category.

I'm going both, although a ton of the GSC problem is O-5 careerism bs.

Background:

^Within the last two years.

Forget the Millennium math problems, There ought to be a million dollar prize to stop that shit.

Except communities are small and people can easily figure out who you're talking about. Far more "anonymous" than anonymous. Finally. Previously you just sounded like a butt hurt whiner, frankly. No, I'd agree these are not great, and things like "unsure how to work sensor" absolutely go back to a concern I listed previously, not studying tactics.

One possible issue is that the further you have to be from the target at launch (e.g. due to threats), the larger sts your cruise missile physically needs to be, which affects a few factors from carriage on airframes to end-game against threats. If you have something that can push further in, it takes care of part of that problem.

If you're going to publicly call some dude out for being a terrible pilot and having a terrible attitude, back it up. Otherwise, don't do it.

Good cop out.

NG is really straying far from the T-38 design here...

Still nothing of substance. You're essentially just bashing someone on a difference of opinion. And your sq environment could absolutely be terrible without you knowing, if for instance you're the prick commander's pet and you just don't see it because your world is rainbows and unicorns.

Homestead doesn't generate a guy named Killer by being in a great area.

Maybe your sq sucks; I'd be more worried if the attitude issues were things like not studying tactics etc. But I was really referring to the flying problems. At face value, turning left isn't different from one airframe to the next. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Empirical examples?