Jump to content

SurelySerious

Supreme User
  • Posts

    2,634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

Everything posted by SurelySerious

  1. Plenty of weapons with off-axis capability that allow employment from the wheel.
  2. Exactly, standard practice.
  3. That mechanism is already in place. Those decisions are already made every day, real-time based on the situation.
  4. No longer, since spring 2014 when Gen Grosso took over and Woodward retired.
  5. He's a troll, so he probably can't.
  6. It just requires a one time meeting with the AG to clear things up, so as long as you've got that scheduled, NBD.
  7. Just because it's legal for the CC to do so, doesn't mean that it's smart (or right).
  8. Bet Putin is loving the disintegration of the EU.
  9. This sounds like an actual actionable plan, when coupled with shedding the dead weight you mentioned.
  10. When you look at it from the perspective that big Army's purpose is to conduct maneuvers to gain and hold land...it makes total sense that big Army guys are just sitting on their hands doing nothing because our troops aren't out there doing that...just SOF and special skills folks advising or whatever they call it. So what they really need is to just take most of big Army out of the chain and trim the fat. That would help with the bureaucracy part a bit (although less infighting entertainment). Then, if they would drop some actual achievable goals, it would be great. Our forces are great at fighting force-on-force, and our counter-terrorism is spot-on...but now they're nearly at the insurgency phase of existence. And we all know how well that goes.
  11. The EU is seemingly similar to Obamacare. You need the healthy people to offset those who require perennial care, but the cost is so high to those healthy people, they'd rather pay the penalty of not being involved.
  12. If you combine the raw bureaucracy of CJTF-OIR with a lack of any achievable goals at the top, it's a special kind of operation.
  13. Have you done the requisite research of going to his profile and clicking "See their activity" before asking?
  14. Standard discredit the opposing narrative based on a false goal. Legal blubbery that means they have no good line of action, but to throw meager appeals to be picked up by those who haven't formed an opinion yet, and reel them in to self-pity and conspiracy theories and victimization.
  15. Just shut the up already. You have no idea what you're talking about. At all.
  16. That's hilarious because in the other thread, you're the crying child.
  17. Stop being a bitch.
  18. Don't get so factual, this is an entertainment industry here.
  19. Take your logic and kindly leave.
×
×
  • Create New...