Pooter

I don't think most of us who you would call "vax enthusiasts" were going "rah rah mandates are amazing, get your 69th booster or we're all gonna die." Can only speak personally but it was more of the sentiment that when you join the military you sign some of your autonomy away. They can literally order you to go die for your country. Last I checked that's bad for your health. So it's pretty silly to act surprised and upset when they make you get a shot. Not to mention, the "my body is a temple" argument doesn't hold much water when no one says shit about: -the even sketchier anthrax shot -the statistically unlikely to work yearly flu shots -the malaria pills that cause lasting risk of birth defects -the go and no go pills proven to cause dependency that are prescribed like candy to bump up mission durations stopgap the regular obliteration of your circadian rhythm -the culture of concealing actual problems from doctors to preserve flying status So forgive me if it came across a bit like a political crusade. But the fun part is now we all have the benefit of hindsight 20/20. We now know covid isn't particularly dangerous for unvaxxed healthy young people and we also know the vaxxed aren't dying in droves from some hypothetical late-onset side effect. Turns out neither were that dangerous.

👍👍

If you can get a your hands on an accurate t-6a model in the sim, yes it would help. "Chairflying" is a nebulous term that means a lot of things to a lot of different people. Maybe it means setting up cockpit posters on a lawn chair and rehearsing the interior inspection, maybe it means shutting your eyes reciting entry parameters and practicing your cross check for aerobatics, and maybe it means sitting at a desk with a map rehearsing your radio calls at different points on a departure. But anything that can help you chairfly with more fidelity is good. A VR cockpit is better than posters. A thrust master stick is better than a plunger. A screen is better than your imagination.. so to speak. Please do yourself a favor and find real UPT training materials and do your best to use the sim in a methodical way to practice those. Don't worry about negative training, it's far less of a threat than zero training. Any half-decent exposure you can get to a composite cross check at this point is money in the bank. obviously we're all human and will use a dope sim to do loops to music and mess around. But if you're actually serious, here's step 1: Find a t-6 checklist formatted like this and use it to identify every switch in the cockpit:

Having taught pilot training, and taught specifically in VR/computer sims with exactly the equipment you listed, I can tell you with 100% certainty you can get training value out of it.. but only if you approach it seriously and methodically. If you play fuck fuck games and yank and bank through downtown Dallas or the Grand Canyon it will give you zero training value. But if you get your hands on a UPT base inflight guide, a t-6 or t-38 sim model and start trying to actually fly military style overhead patterns you will get something out of it. Both from a pacing and cross check perspective. Don't try to practice aerobatics, it's garbage and negative training. Look up what a vertical S maneuver is and try to do that. Also try turns at different bank angles 30, 45, and 60 while trying maintaining your altitude +/-150 feet.

Nothing against anyone's parents (mine are the same way) but I think this shows how emotionally driven the average voter is. The idea of thinking strategically about candidate viability isn't really a thing people do unless they're really into politics or listen to non-mainstream political commentary.

7:44 AM 😂😂😂😂 Working in that office must have been bonkers.. Driving to work.. phone starts blowing up "oh shit what did he do now" 1hr later press secretary at an all hands meeting: "he was taking his morning dump and went nuclear on the constitution, how do we spin this"

Wild to see the GOP so utterly captured like this. You have the most beatable opponent in a generation in Joe Biden between the cognitive decline, objectively bad economy, foreign policy disasters, and insane wokeness.. And the presumptive GOP nominee is perhaps the only person on earth more polarizing and less likely to win the general. And the hilarious part people are trying to distance from trump now but that opportunity passed by long ago. The early election denial Rudy/Sidney Powell clown show phase was probably the best opportunity to boot trump out of the mainstream right. But now he has too much momentum and will steamroll people and feed off the smaller fish like he did last time. Fox even had a chance to bail on trump, and their own internal comms show everyone there thought he was batshit, but they caved to the hardline trump base eventually. It makes me wonder.. fun conspiracy theory here: do media companies actively conspire to get their political opposition elected? Trump was tv ratings crack for the MSM and I'm sure fox gets a boost when Dems are in charge and they can just rail on whatever the left is pushing at the time. It would be a smart move by fox. Appease the base by backing trump.. but knowing full well he'll lose the general so you'll get to keep your rail-on-the-current-dem-administration ratings boost.

I'm not sure if any CSAF is going to solve the pacific range/gas/logistics problem regardless of background. The "do more with less" trend the entire Air Force has succumbed to in the last 20 years has eroded the sheer numbers of crews and jets in both the MAF and CAF available to project power at scale on the literal other side of the world. Those numbers were baked into the cake long ago and we are not producing pilots or airframes fast enough to dig out of that hole. I think beating the war drum over China is pretty silly because: a) war with China sounds like a really really bad time. It won't be a Middle East mud hut turkey shoot b) China has proven they're shrewd strategists who work the long game. We have this funny obsession with the next five years but China has demonstrated they have a far longer strategic attention span. Are any of our leaders talking about a 2049 plan? Because China is. Delaying a hypothetical conflict only benefits them and if their manufacturing continues at present pace, they just have to wait until intervention becomes completely unpalatable to the west. And that gives their public influence campaigns more time to work. They may very well be able to "re-unify" without ever firing a shot.

Guys I figured it out, if every dude on earth identifies as a woman maybe we can get the left to quit bitching about the gender pay gap but seriously the lefts gender philosophy is so full of contradictions and I feel like the right does a very poor job pointing them out. If women are a victim class that need protecting, it must have some definition.. except the left balks when you ask for one. If gender is a social construct and completely fluid, why do people need to get surgeries to align with something (apparently) totally made up.

Do any of your big brain coworkers talk at all about how we would measure something like consciousness? That's the part I'm most curious about. The exponential nature of language learning algorithms makes sense, but at some point there's a difference between a procedural learning machine and a living, feeling, conscious entity. If we created real AI would we even know we did? Or could it maybe be created by a more primitive AI iterating on itself? 🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️

Totally agree. It's funny, when people say leftism has become a religion I don't think they realize that's an indictment of leftism.. and religion

Not a troll and I'm happy to have good faith debate to the extent that I have limited time to live my life on the baseops forums. Anyone familiar with my comment history knows I bash on the radical left as much as the radical right. It's almost like I have a thing against radicals of all types! Weird.. I think we all need some devils advocate (pun intended) from time to time to prevent this place from turning into a breitbart comments section, and I'm happy to provide it.

Exodus 32 verses 19-35. You know that little part about Moses and the people who chose the side of the lord slaughtering 3,000 of their friends and family. Numbers 15, a man is found working on the sabbath. God orders him to be killed and he is stoned. God orders Moses to "Harass the midianites, and smite them", and to again count "all that are able to go forth to war in Israel" (Numbers 25–26).The Israelites go to war, and "slew every male". They take captive the women and children, and take all cattle, flocks and goods as loot, and burn all cities and camps. When they return to Moses, he is angered, and commands "Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves" Just a few examples. I can go on quite literally all day quoting wildly messed up passages of the Bible justifying violence against non-believers, idolaters, people who just are different from the Israelites etc.. But I'm sure you guys have a bunch of public mental jiujitsu forthcoming about how the New Testament makes all this stuff magically okay now and it's all about forgiveness. I'll just refer you to the "liberty way" code they force all students to sign which dictates students conduct themselves according to fundamentalist/literalist Bible interpretations in their personal lives or risk expulsion/punishment. Homosexual students literally have to keep their relationships secret.. much like homosexuals do in certain fundamentalist middle eastern cultures. I don't have any fundamentalist Christian friends and I doubt they'd want to be friends with me. After all I drink, take the lords name in vain, had a bunch of pre-marital sex, and generally strive to violate most of the liberty way. But to answer your question, no I wouldn't say anything. Primarily because gay, straight, trans, or bigoted religious zealot, as long as you aren't actively hurting anyone I don't really care what you think. Thinking extreme things and violently acting on those extreme thoughts are different. But my point here is the root of the intolerant thoughts is the same. The idea that your religion knows best and others living differently should be judged holds across almost all religions across the world. Whether you act on those crap ideas is mainly a product of your environment and how much your surrounding culture normalizes violence.

Honestly.. kinda yeah. If you live in a western 1st world country and your views are 60-90% as regressive as Islamic extremists in the third world.. you might have a problem. Born in a slightly different time/place LU fundamentalists are exactly the type of people who would have conducted jihads/crusades over their religious dogma. Christians throughout history have leveraged intolerance to justify violence, just like Islamic extremists do. The Bible is every bit as brutal as the Quran. Only recently after centuries of moderation due mainly to renaissance humanists, have Christians in the western 1st world figured out that bigoted violence isn't okay. Just in time for them to get on their high horse about it. But the intolerance never went away, the violence was just moderated.. from mostly external sources. Religious extremism is the same intolerant mentality whether you find it in Afghanistan or rural Virginia. It just presents differently when it's filtered through local cultural norms.

Under a discord pseudonym that uses your actual first name Jesus H Christ 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️ I can see the cyber awareness CBT update now.. Situation of the day: You're T-bagging n00bs with your CoD buddies in discord and a new user named "Steve the sketchy spy" joins the chat. He sends you an attachment labeled "super dope government intel brief". Do you: a) open the attachment b) call the New York Times c) go off the grid d) alert your security manager d INCORRECT e) you forgot to pull your CAC first standby for remediation

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/boston/news/jack-teixeira-massachusetts-air-national-guard-member-accused-secret-pentagon-documents-leak-dighton/ this one actually identifies the dude

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/authorities-identify-massachusetts-air-national-guard-member-person/story?id=98558673 Airman snuffy really f-ed up this time. I think this EPR might be a referral guys

No I'm saying people vote mainly along party lines and when they don't do that, they vote on candidate personality. Which is why running a bland houseplant is the better move than Kamala or Gavin.. both deeply unlikeable people for a litany of reasons.

Well said. I disagree a lot with Jon Stewart politically but he has a nose for sniffing out bullshit and exposing it. Reference his popularization of the lab leak on colbert's show or all of his amazing 9-11 responders advocacy. It's insane to come into this conversation snippy and condescending the way she did.

Gavin Newsom might be in a three way tie with kamala and trump for the most hated political players in America right now. If Dems go with Gavin that will be a major mistake. His negatives are huge and most of the country is highly aware of the shithole California has become. Stretching Biden for another term is the best play for the left. Other than a left field Yang/Tulsi ticket that they'd never do in a million years. The game at this point is basically whichever party can alienate fewer people wins, so as long as trump is running Dems have a great chance with the senile houseplant

More of a DOD-wide problem but here's Jon Stewart asking the deputy defense secretary basic questions about why we cant account for where 70% of the budget goes And she has the nerve to get snippy with him.. lady, in what world are you going to verbally out-maneuver Jon Stewart

I don't know what to tell you guys, you're all looking for some virtuous moral north star in a game completely devoid of morals. You're absolutely right, it's capricious, targeted, and almost certainly strategically timed for maximum election impact. But if you don't like it, don't give them an opening. Be smarter than them. Because you can bet the left will try to capitalize on any indiscretion just as I would expect the right to do if the roles were reversed. Trump is the epitome of the phrase "play stupid games, win stupid prizes." It's also pretty funny that you mention perception. Because a majority of Americans support the indictment. This is not playing as some horrific travesty of justice anywhere other than very right wing circles. And this next point doesn't speak to the validity of the case, but since you mentioned perception.. it appears the majority perception in America is that trump has existed almost entirely outside the rule of law, so people don't seem to have qualms about the book finally being thrown at him. Trump being held accountable for something.. literally anything.. is a far cry from Maoist/Stalinist political persecution. But you keep trying to sell that one through 2024 and see how far it gets you.

Well one is potentially a crime, and the other is a strategic decision about when to prosecute that potential crime. Seems like a pretty simple distinction to me. And I'm not saying trying to influence an election is bad. That's literally what running for office is. That's why people raise money, and run attack ads, and try to win debates. But the common thread here is: don't be an idiot. If you have skeletons that will hurt your election chances and are going to pay people off, be smart about it and don't get caught. Because you can bet the other team is going to have a field day if they figure out what you did. Im not really interested in making value judgments either way. You all know my opinions on trump but on the flip side of the coin, I don't think the Dems are on some morally virtuous crusade. They're making hay while the sun is shining. That's it.

I do think there's a fun question in here to unpack though.. Are the democrats targeting trump because they actually think they can take him down, or are they doing it to prop him up so he wins the nomination? If it's the latter, which it probably is, it's a great move from the left. I think they believe trump is utterly unelectable in a general election so they want to ensure he's the nominee. If they space out the prosecution of the payments, the Georgia fake electors scheme, and the classified documents, they'll keep the media lens squarely focused on trump to the detriment of any other candidates on the right all the way through this year. Trump's significant but non-majority base will galvanize around his martyr status, edge out any viable Republican candidates, and virtually guarantee dems a win in 2024.

The underlying crime being trying to influence the outcome of an election.. you know that little thing. And I'm sure the prosecution wouldn't debut these charges only to get immediately top-roped by a 5 year timer they forgot to account for. Turns out there quite a lot more nuance to that as well which I'm sure will be fiercely argued in court. The legal analysis I've seen of this case that seems legit all zeros in on the prosecution having to prove trumps intent behind the payments. Because the intent speaks to the possibility of a larger crime.