Banzai
-
Posts
108 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Everything posted by Banzai
-
I can’t wait to see the trades of congressman and folks in the administration. Must be reported by May 15. Equally excited to see this forum explain how it isn’t insider trading and is somehow not only ethical but also logical and obviously the right thing to do.
-
https://amp.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3306066/eu-leaders-plan-trip-beijing-july-summit-xi-jinping If true, we’re gonna get to test your guys’s theories about how soft power and globalization are old news! The cracks are starting to form in the world order. But at least some insiders and billionaires are making money off dumps and pumps while we go down. Transfer that wealth!
-
Nice!
-
1912 political cartoons are back in vogue.
-
And after today?
-
You said trillions. 2 of your sources are 1-2 billion and one was apple. The difference between 1-2 billion and 1 trillion dollars? About a trillion dollars. This is nothing. To apple, if you didn’t know, they do this every presidency to gain favor with the public. They promised 430 billion in 2021 and 350 billion in 2018 that, yep, never materialized: 2021: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2021/04/apple-commits-430-billion-in-us-investments-over-five-years 2018: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/01/apple-accelerates-us-investment-and-job-creation/ The TRILLIONS in investments are not existent. You’re buying in to either Fox propaganda (that says there are 5T of new investments with no source), or you’re looking to find something that fits your worldview and not question it. I sincerely hope companies do, I really do, but it’s ridiculous to say they are right now.
-
Go with a SINGLE credible source on the investments. A SINGLE one.
-
Also I’m not a democrat, what is “my party” you speak of?
-
Why?
-
When I posted it, it was correct. Go ahead and prove that their first story on it wasn’t at 10 PM. To your question, are you trying to tell us something about yourself? Or do you just sit at home and fume about people’s genitalia in your free time? The talk radio mind rot gotchu bad bb.
-
https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article303655371.html Turns out that even when you reduce your tariffs to 0, the current US is so unpredictable that that is not enough. There is literally no proof that what you said will mean anything - just as your Vietnam point was pointless. If it’s about deficits, there’s nothing we can do but enjoy the depression.
-
Yeah, I’m sure you are aware that Vietnam right now has an effective tariff rate of about 1%, right? Huge winning getting that reduced. You are one of the biggest propaganda echo chamber enjoyers. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/tm.tax.mrch.wm.ar.zs?locations=VN
-
You guys think it’s odd that FoxNews doesn’t have a single story on the market and removed their stock ticker? Or is that how fair and balanced news looks?
-
@BashiChuni @Boomer6 What do you not like about this? The tariff rates published by the White House are literally the trade deficit ratios (with a minimum blanket rate). I find it especially hilarious that because of this blanket simple math, they are instituting tariffs on places like uninhabited islands (Heard and McDonald island) and islands which are literally only inhabited by US/UK military personnel (Diego Garcia) 😂 Drove past a few of these bad boys a couple weeks ago, and you’ve gotta admit, stock prices are low. Promise made, promise kept!
-
You can retract your statement anyways. Bad take and you know it. Especially bad coming from an alleged combat aviator; feel sad to what you’re doing to your credibility. It was revealed that F-18s, tomahawks, and MQ-9s were tasked to strike the houthis “top missile guy” at an exact time. The Houthis have SA-6s and SA-3s and have shot down over a dozen of our aircraft. There is clearly risk. Recommend to rebuild you don’t go too deep down the talk radio path you’re flirting with and get back to studying. I’d start with what the classification of these things are: - Movement of ammunition, aircraft, personnel, units, or comm equipment. - Date and time mission/operations begin - Time lines/schedules There are some FOIAd SCGs. DYOR.
-
I think it’s safe to say I don’t believe that.
-
I do not recall the definition of classified information. But I am glad that she said that there was no classified information. I look forward to having the SSCI validate her statement and reassure the public. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5212821-atlantic-editor-suggests-hes-open-to-sharing-hegseths-full-war-plans-texts-publicly/
-
I do not remember and do not recall.
-
How about this, let’s take a hypothetical stance that there is totally not enough evidence to believe this is anything other than a fake news smear job. If it comes out as true - which the truth will come out when the reporter is called to testify - will you oppose and denounce the actions taken if targets and timing and/or other classified information were shared?
-
I just want to confirm you stance. Do you believe that these screenshots are fake? Followed by Or do you believe those are true? What do you think about the national security council saying they appear to be authentic? If you believe they are true then is your belief that in between these texts in this text chain they did not share information on the strikes - and that was entirely fabricated? Do you think it’s possible that the reporter is being truthful in intentionally not sharing what he thinks is classified information? If it is true, do you think he should openly share what he believes is classified information? Or do you think if he believes that it is classified that he should not put it out there? Is your stance that, although much of what was stated by the reporter is backed up by verifiable evidence, that this portion of his article is fake news? If so, what makes you think that?
-
You’re being intentionally dense. The reporter knew timing and location of when strikes were happening within 15 minutes of TTI. He knew this more than 2 hours before the strikes.
-
What level are ATOs? You know that timing and location would be classified prior to execution of an attack. Additionally, in the Atlantic article, the editor clearly censored multiple texts. Also, did you “see” any of Hillary’s screenshots? You have to understand you are entirely falling into a double standard because of political affiliation.
-
Remember, the majority of this forum called for Hillary Clinton to go to prison when folks found out she was hosting a private messaging server for official business. I’m sure that there will be no double standards applied in this case. On the other hand, everyone could just ignore it and raise tenuous points about how this story could be fake news (which has essentially already been done), even though the administration confirmed its veracity.
-
Whataboutism at its finest.
-
Oh yeah, give me those talking points harder. You don’t like historical analogies and then go on an ad hominem? That’s minus 1 point, not looking good for you right now.
