Jump to content

cragspider

Supreme User
  • Posts

    302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cragspider

  1. So I guess thats why we let some of the good people VSP and keep the ones we shouldn't huh? Don't get me wrong I love being in the AF but its heritage is where I see stuff lacking, its nothing compared to the Marines or hell even the Army. If the leaders say we want to go back to our heritage then why don't we bring out the uniforms form the good old days. Hell besides the Marines getting new BDU's I don't think that they have changed their dress uniform in a long time, or even their slogan.
  2. That is a great pic. But as most of you all have heard that pic caught a lot of flack for it. From what I was told by the Group CC at Salem in June that because of that pic a lot of shit rolled down hill at said location for it. I don't know the specifics, but its just sad that we can't have any fun at all. I think we need to get the PC out of the military and bring back some of the good old traditions of pre PC years since thats the way that the Air Force is wanting to go, back to our heritage.
  3. Well here is some more info on the supposed "Chemtrails" that was in the Abilene Reporter newpaper today. I am sad to say that this guy even lives in the same area and they out this crap in the local paper. Oh well I guess that it was a slow news day yesterday to let them put this in. On with the article. Abilene man wants to warn you about the dangers of 'chemtrails' Darrin McBreen wants people to look up in the sky -- and contemplate what might be happening up there that might be affecting us down here. McBreen, 41, has created a popular YouTube video, featuring footage shot in Abilene, examining "chemtrails," a term derived from the belief of some researchers that certain jet plane contrails dump chemicals on an unsuspecting populace below. The reasons given for such alleged activity vary. Some advocates link it to weather control experimentation, while other researchers tie in more dire effects, ranging from ill health to (at the extreme end) a program of mind control, echoing other historical examples of overt experimentation on mass human populations. McBreen, who is an Abilene Reporter-News Internet media consultant, said the response to his roughly nine-minute video was both surprising and pleasing. "The response has been incredible," he said. "About 30,000 people have seen it in a week's time. ... I've received responses from all over the world." Feedback has ranged from confirmation and personal anecdote to overt snark -- along the lines of "Are you wearing your tinfoil helmet?" he joked. But his video, "Danger In the Sky -- The Chemtrail Phenomenon," has maintained a five-star rating on YouTube and garnered more than 600 comments, features interviews with figures such as Austin-based radio personality Alex Jones, speaking over footage of planes flying among familiar Abilene landmarks. A contrail, short for condensation trail, is a line-shaped cloud sometimes produced by aircraft engine exhaust, according to a U.S. Air Force online document "Contrails Facts." The combination of high humidity and low temperatures that often exist at aircraft cruise altitudes allows for their formation. Such contrails are composed primarily of water, in the form of ice crystals, and "do not pose health risks to humans," according to the Air Force site. But advocates of chemtrail and other related theories argue that isn't always the case, although their reasons differ -- often wildly. McBreen said chemtrails appealed to him as a video subject because he believes the concept has credibility. "It started out with an article by Devvy Kidd," he said. Kidd, a journalist who lives in Big Spring, is sometimes featured on the Web site of Jeff Rense, a radio talk-show host who often deals with controversial topics such as chemtrails. "I thought that was kind of interesting that (Kidd) was from the Big Country," he said. According to Rense's Web site, chemtrails "look like contrails initially but are much thicker, extend across the sky and are often laid down in varying patterns of Xs, tic-tac-toe grids, cross-hatched and parallel lines." Such trails, according to a Frequently Asked Questions file on Rense's site, "expand and drop feathers and mares' tails. In 30 minutes or less, they open into wispy formations which join together, forming a thick white veil or a 'fake cirrus-type cloud' that persists for hours." A normal contrail "is supposed to dissipate over 30 seconds to three minutes," McBreen said. Many researchers also report a sort of cross-hatching effect of interspersed contrails, which some take to be sky-based markers, and unusual behavior of the planes themselves, circling and looping to cover and recover an area in ways they find to be anomalous. Like many, McBreen believes some chemtrail sightings can be tied to weather experimentation, with side effects such as spikes in elements such as "aluminum and barium in drinking water supplies and in the air," he said. Some who have communicated with him because of the video have agreed, even going so far as to say they can "taste the aluminum" in their mouths from chemtrails in their area, he said. "Some of the more hard-core researchers wonder if it isn't a type of population control, with the intent to wear down your immune system," he said. "When I first heard that, I found that to be pretty extreme. But the United States has a long history of chemical and biological testing on its own personnel." McBreen mentioned a 1994 "Rockefeller Report," often quoted on conspiracy and chemtrail Web sites, detailing alleged experiments performed on U.S. soldiers. The report, "Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans' Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century," indicates it was prepared for the U.S. Senate's Committee on Veterans' Affairs in December 1994. Among the report's conclusions are that "for at least 50 years, (the Department of Defense) has intentionally exposed military personnel to potentially dangerous substances, often in secret." That said, the U.S. Air Force's Web site describes the entire chemtrail theory as a hoax, which it claims has been investigated and refuted by established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, etc. Specifically, the Air Force notes that a contrail can remain visible for long periods of time with its lifetime a function of temperature, humidity, winds and aircraft exhaust characteristics -- and that such contrails can form many shapes as they are dispersed by horizontal and vertical wind shear. Similarly, skeptics assert the changeover from turbojet to turbofan engines results in a different appearance than what some chemtrail theorists remember contrails used to look like. Requests for a comment from Dyess Air Force Base on Tuesday were met with referrals to the Air Force's official position on the phenomenon. McBreen said that while chemtrail research is thriving on the Internet, it is important for people to understand that the evidence is "not limited to photos and videos posted on the Web." There are military reports, government studies, U.S. patents and U.S. legislation that back up claims by researchers," he said. "The Space Preservation Act of 2001 mentions chemtrails by name, for example." In the Act, which seeks to "preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States," chemtrails are described, along with lasers, plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, ultrasonic weapons, and others as "exotic weapons systems." Mainstream media reports are included in McBreen's video, most notably television news reports from KSLA News in Louisiana (which McBreen said "confirms barium in Chemtrails") and a "report from NBC News 4 in Los Angeles where residents reported getting ill from chemtrail activity," he said. McBreen said he would simply like to see more open debate on the topic. "Not every contrail you see that stays up there might be a chemtrail," he said. "But we do know that there are weather modification programs. We do know that they are cloud seeding. And we do know that they have experimented on their own people in the past." It isn't the end of McBreen's video-making. Next, he plans to tackle the topic of depleted uranium, used in munitions and considered controversial because of what some believe could be potential long-term health effects.
  4. Or they could do what the Kuwati's do with the wi-fi here at Salem, just filter out the porn/sexual content sites. Granted the wi-fi is slow and not really worth the pirce you pay but at least we can us a web cam and chat with our familys back home. I don't even want to know how slow it is going to be at the died.
  5. Each room should have a converter in it so that you can plug in your good old US electronic stuff, plus it steps down the voltage as well. The internet access that they have isn't as restrictive as we have back here in the states but you can't use chat programs or visit sites like myspace and other personal pages. If you want to you can have the com guys wipe your personal laptop so you can plug it up to the network there unless you happen to get a room with a computer in it. I know that my squadron when I was there we each had a computer in the room that we could check our work email as well as check most web based email sites. Hope that this helps.
  6. I know some buddies of mine who were CFI's and they were 6'4" or taller and had no problem sitting in it. The key was that the seats are reclined back some so that helped out. But it was funny to watch them get in it.
  7. From what I was told about the "grey" paint jobs on the t-1's and the t-6's was that they had money left over and needed to spend it, but they only painted a handful of them. Also some Gen. wanted to make the pilot's/students feel like in an operational jet and not in trainer. However it just makes them even harder to see. But what do I know that was what they told a lowly Lt. [ 22. December 2006, 10:50: Message edited by: cragspider ]
  8. Rotorhead, how did your assembly turn out?
  9. or you could check out aopa.com for info on flight schools in the local area.
  10. Like it was said earlier, you either have to be retired, which most of the pilots are retired AF or be one of the lucky few Maj/LtCol's who get that job.
  11. It's like riding on any other 737 out there. Its nothing special. Yes the radars do suck, but it depends on the level of suckyness to where you are located in the training compartment. The INS wanders like every other INS out there. As for dipping on the plane Im not going to comment on that. Also i duno where the pcola guy gets off talking about how its a pos, cause all he did was get a ride on it for a xc, which is really "nav intensive".
  12. The guy you're talking about is in my class and what you say is true, however, you've been given the wrong spin. What happened was he tanked two aerospace tests back to back and both by one question. What sucks is that it was for the same block and in the beginning of training. This put him in a solid dead last in class rank. Since then he's failed no exams, EP quizzes and hasn't hooked any checkrides. He busted his ass and is now ranked in the middle of the class. He never rolled back either. This is a big deal considering our class started with 28 rolled in 8 and will only graduate 15. That's a 58% loss which only includes three Navy graduates. Personally, I'd fly with this guy any day. He's a good guy and will make a great navigator. ------------ Wxpunk
  13. The reason that they don't make the nav/ewo's go through both training programs is because the AF won't give the school enough TD's to get it done. In a prefect world and maybe one day down the road, true CSO's will be in the AF. But untill that day there will be navs, ewo's, and wso's. Speaking of wso's, I find it funny that they go through Pcola, get there wings and then come to Randolph to go through 4 months of more training. Just so they could go sit both seats in a bone or sit back seat in a strike eagle. Why can't all nav's go through the same training and then figure out which job and airframe they will go to. But as for cso's being tracked to uav's not out of randolph. But there are IN's here who are going to uav's. However you have to have a commercial rating to go "fly" them. So for a nav to go "fly" them either the AF will have to pay for the pvt and commercial rating and possibly the instrument as well or the nav will have to pay for them all out of pocket to be able to go. Take your pick on what should be done?
  14. I know of the guy your talking about. He hasn't graduated yet, but will in 4 weeks. He also busted his ass the rest of the time. There are a few people who really should of been washed out a while back but he some how managed to stay in, and now is going to an aircraft that a nav is an important part.
  15. Im currently at RAFB with 60 days left to graduation and we have not heard of anything about getting slicks to either Cheyenne or Petterson. I know for a fact that the unit at Petterson will not be on the books untill FY08 and thats coming from a person in my class who is with the unit there. Trust me if we had that option to go to those units those would be one of the prime choices for some of the people here. All that we have heard about those units is that the IN will have first choice to go there not the new navs. [ 17. June 2006, 21:35: Message edited by: cragspider ]
  16. When I got here to RAFB back in aug it was when an asbc class got out so that there was an influx of new students. The dorm occupancy rate had to be above 90% to get off base. Sgt Dorm Master, thats a whole nother story. For the guy who is engaged and getting married, I would A get married now/before you start class, or B wait till you graduate. Even though there is time to leave to go get married, you will roll into a later class if you have started. Plus if you are married when you get here, or right after they have to let you out of the dorms. If any other people have questions send me a PM cause I have 4 months left of training and can help out.
×
×
  • Create New...