chase

No worries...you’re not my boogeyman. Maybe my reading and comprehension suck. (I still disagree that Target and TOT are CUI, though.) Just to clarify, all I wanted was an adult response from them: “Okay, we ed up. We’ll handle it better in the future. Pete gets 10 uninterrupted hours of Cyber Awareness Training. Moving on.” I’m just… disappointed and wanted to see if others with the same background are as unimpressed as I am. At least the public gets to see how army leadership operates in reality: “We ruin everything good and fun.”

Disregard on target location, my bad i didn't check the message timeline but it was obvious that its about the Houthis. But dude, seriously...stop pretending this is somehow fine. I’m terrified about what else has been leaked to who-knows-who due to gross incompetence by people who REALLY should’ve known better (SECDEF, D/CIA). don’t be an asshat...

You should listen to the entire interview if you haven’t. Kudos to Vance this is the first time someone vocalizes what we actually want, and i agree with a lot of it. The only thing that strikes me as odd is: On one hand, Greenland is suddenly a "priority for national security," while on the other hand "We won’t do anything about it, but we’ll invest in icebreakers."

Target, Target location and TOT is now CUI, check.

The world is becoming a place where our government is unintentionally following Soviet tactics to divide the West.

Oof I don’t get it. Fire the person responsible. Admit you messed up. Move on. NOW, after denying and lying about it, they basically need to start a war to make this go away.

The defense of democracy is necessary to defeat Russia <go google yourself a random twitter link about Romanian Election Campaign Interference that supports my narrative>

Right into personally attacking me, huh? I never implied I’m not on your side, whatever that is. The guy is literally a talking head on Russian-paid state TV.

Although I see your point, what we really don’t want is a strong, militarily independent, near-peer Europe. I see NATO as a strategic tool to keep tabs on both the Europeans and Russia. We just got rid of Russia (basically for free compared to the cost of the Cold War), and thanks to our new friend Putin, we are finally getting NATO in shape (spending-wise). You really don’t want Germany, Finland, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway to join the instant sunshine club, do you? Also, can we just remove political decision-makers from social media? Yes? Official Statement: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/statement-from-minister-of-defence-tore-o.-sandvik-on-recent-reports-concerning-naval-support/id3090130/

By a guy who lost his investments in Russia and now takes money from the Kremlin? That’s rich—even coming from you.

So...how many Planes did they loose in the last 24 hours? Good footage tho.

First hand knowledge: It's the tax office in Kusel causing the problem, not Kaiserslautern. Apparently the problem started '18 with new leadership in Kusel. Go figure. OSI don't even get me started...

While trying to update my 80s knowledge of Soviet Russian Armor i stumbled across a list of Russian and Ukrainian losses: (Take it with a grain of salt) https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html

The Germans finally woke up: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/27/scholz-germany-pledges-defense-spending-increase-in-shift-in-strategy.html "Germany is committing 100 billion euros ($112.7 billion) to a fund for its armed services and will ramp up its defense spending above 2% of its gross domestic product, Chancellor Olaf Scholz said during a special session of the Bundestag on Sunday. It has become clear that “we need to invest significantly more in the security of our country, in order to protect our freedom and our democracy,” Scholz said." "Germany could purchase U.S. F-35 fighter jets built by Lockheed Martin (LMT.N) to replace its ageing Tornado in the role of nuclear sharing, Scholz said."

Keep talking. Enlighten us.

Jesus I'm ing stupid. It was Clark. I guess I'm to old and senile for a damn Message Board. Moving on.

1.) Wait what? You did highlight that part of the article. Seriously?! But anyway, I've worked in a similar position with the Germans so i have a vague idea on why you see it that way. But I have totally different opinion on that. 2.) Okay, i totally deserve that one for being a smart-ass.

So you quote a guy that is the political equivalent of the county administrator of Tom Green County ,Texas. out of an Article written by a pizza delivery dude who is pumping out 5 Articles a day for a Online Newspaper owned by a guy who was banned from twitter after writing he wanted to see Anthony Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray beheaded in front of the white house,as i quote: "as a warning to bureaucrats" Ooookay... Also you're essentially saying you want the NATO to step up and rebuild a house we've blown the roof off over the last decade. Check.

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=who+pays+for+nato https://www.bbc.com/news/world-44717074 WE: 22% | Germany: 14.76% | France/UK: 10.5% But don't let facts get in your way. Disclaimer: I really think the germans need to step up their defence game, but this is getting ridiculous.